Growth and yield of all-aged Douglas-fir - Western hemlock forest stands: A matrix model with stand diversity effects

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2368-2381

  Liang, Jingjing ^a   Buongiorno, Joseph ^a   Monserud, Robert A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; VEGETATION;

DOUGLAS-FIR; MATRIX MODEL; SPECIES-DEPENDENT EQUATIONS;

FORESTRY;

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GROWTH RATE; RECRUITMENT; SILVICULTURE; STAND STRUCTURE; YIELD;

FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANTS;

NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC NORTHWEST;

CONIUM; PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; TSUGA; TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA;

EID: 33644525326     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x05-137     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adams, D.M., and Ek, A.R. 1974. Optimizing the management of uneven-aged forest stands. Can. J. For. Res. 4: 274-287.
2. Arney, J.D. 1985. A modeling strategy for the growth projection of managed stands. Can. J. For. Res. 15(3): 511-518.
3. Arney, J.D. 1995. Forest projection system user's guide. Tech. Rep. 1a. Forest Biometrics, Gresham, Ore.
4. Barbour, M.G., and Billings, W.D. 1988. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Barnes, G.H. 1962. Yield of even-aged stands of western hemlock. Technical Bulletin No. 1273. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
6. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R.E. 1980. Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
7. Buongiorno, J., and Michie, B.R. 1980. A matrix model of unevenaged forest management. For. Sci. 26(4): 609-625.
8. Buongiorno, J., Peyron, J.L., Houllier, F., and Bruciamacchie, M. 1995. Growth and management of mixed-species, uneven-aged forests in the French Jura: implications for economic returns and tree diversity. For. Sci. 41(3): 397-429.
9. Burns, R.M., and Honkala, B.H. (Technical coordinators). 1990. Silvics of North America. 1. Conifers. USDA. For. Serv. Agric. Handb. 654.
10. Busing, R.T., and Garman, S.L. 2002. Promoting old-growth characteristics and long-term wood production in Douglas-fir forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 160: 161-175.
11. Cardinale, B.J., Ives, A.R., and Inchausti, P. 2004. Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference. Oikos, 104(3): 437-450.
12. Caspersen, J., and Pacala, S. 2001. Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function. Ecol. Res. 16: 895-903.
13. Chen, H.Y.H., and Klinka, K. 2003. Aboveground productivity of western hemlock and western redcedar mixed-species stands in southern coastal British Columbia. For. Ecol. Manage. 184: 55-64.
14. Curtis, R.O., Clendenen, G.W., and DeMars, D.J. 1981. A new stand simulator for coast Douglas-fir: DFSIM user's guide. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-128.
15. Curtis, R.O., Clendenen, G.W., Reukema, D.L., and DeMars, D.J. 1982. Yield tables for managed stand of coast Douglas-fir. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-135.
16. Curtis, R.O., and Carey, A.B. 1996. Managing economic and ecological values in Douglas-fir forests. J. For. 94: 1-7, 35-37.
17. Draper, N.R., and Smith, H. 1998. Applied regression analysis. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
18. Emmingham, W. 1998. Uneven-aged management in the Pacific Northwest. J. For. 96(7): 37-39.
19. Franklin, J.F., and Dyrness, C.T. 1988. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
20. Franklin, J.F., Cromack, K., Jr., Denison, W., McKee, A., Maser, C., Sedell, J., Swanson, F., and Juday, G. 1981. Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR-PNW-118.
21. Garman, S.L. 2004. Design and evaluation of a forest landscape change model for western Oregon. Ecol. Model. 175(4): 319-337.
22. Garman, S.L., Cissel, J.H., and Mayo, J.H. 2003. Accelerating development of late-successional conditions in young managed Douglas-fir stands: a simulation study. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-557.
23. Guldin, J.M. 1996. The role of uneven-aged silviculture in the context of ecosystem management. W. J. Appl. For. 11(1): 4-12.
24. Haight, R.G., and Monserud, R.A. 1990. Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands: II. Effects of decision criteria. For. Sci. 36(1): 125-144.
25. Hansen, A.J., Spies, T.A., Swanson, F.J., and Ohmann, J.L. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests: lessons from natural forests. Bioscience, 41(6): 382-292.
26. Hanson, E.J., Azuma, D.L., and Hiserote, B.A. 2002. Site index equations and mean annual increment equations for Pacific Northwest Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis, 1985-2001. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note PNW-RN-533.
27. Hermann, R.K., and Lavender, D.P. 1990. Douglas-fir. In Silvics of North America. 1. Conifers. Technical coordinators R.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala. USDA. For. Serv. Agric. Handb. 654. pp. 527-540.
28. Hiserote, B., and Waddell, K. 2003. The PNW-FIA integrated database user guide. A database of forest inventory information for California, Oregon and Washington, Version 1.3. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Portland, Ore.
29. Lin, C.R., Buongiorno, J., Prestemon, J., and Skog, K. 1998. Growth model for uneven-aged loblolly pine stands. Simulations and management implications. USDA. For. Serv. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-569.
30. Little, E.L. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). USDA Agric. Handb. 541.
31. Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
32. McArdle, R.E., Meyer, W.H., and Bruce, D. 1961. The yield of Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. USDA For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 201.
33. Monserud, R.A. 2003a. Evaluating forest models in a sustainable forest management context. Forest Biometry, Modelling and Information Sciences (FBMIS) [online], 1: 35-47. Available from http://www.fbmis.info/.
34. Monserud, R.A. 2003b. Modeling stand growth and management. In Compatible forest management. Edited by R.A. Monserud, R. Haynes, and A. Johnson. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 145-176.
35. Monserud, R.A. 2003c. Modeling landscape management. In Compatible forest management. Edited by R.A. Monserud, R. Haynes, and A. Johnson. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 177-208.
36. Munger, T.T. 1940. The cycle from Douglas-fir to hemlock. Ecology, 21: 451-459.
37. Packee, E.C. 1990. Western hemlock. In Silvics of North America. 1. Conifers. Technical coordinators R.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala. USDA. For. Serv. Agric. Handb. 654. pp. 613-622.
38. Piazza, M. 1999. Diversity-productivity relations in the northern hardwoods of Wisconsin and Michigan. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
39. Ralston, R., Buongiorno, J., Schulte, B., and Fried, J. 2003. Non-linear matrix modeling of forest growth with permanent plot data: the case of uneven-aged Douglas-fir stands. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 10: 461-482.
40. Ritchie, M.W. 1999. A compendium of forest growth and yield simulators for the Pacific Coast states. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-174.
41. Robinson, A.P., and Monserud, R.A. 2003. Criteria for comparing the adaptability of forest growth models. For. Ecol. Manage. 172(1): 53-67.
42. Schulte, B.J., and Buongiorno, J. 2004. A growth and yield model for naturally-regenerated mixed shortleaf pine forests in the southern United States of America. Int. For. Rev. 6(1): 19-29.
43. Teck, R., Moeur, M., and Adams, J. (Editors). 1997. Proceedings: Forest Vegetation Simulator Conference, 3-7 February 1997, Fort Collins, Colo. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-373.
44. Tilman, D., and Downing, J.A. 1994. Biodiversity and stability of grasslands. Nature (London), 367: 363-365.
45. Tilman, D., Wedin, D., and Knops, J. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced in grassland ecosystems. Nature (London), 379: 718-720.
46. Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M., and Siemann, E. 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science (Washington, D.C.), 277: 1300-1302.
47. Urban, D.L., Bonan, G.B., Smith, T.M., and Shugart, H.H. 1991. Spatial applications of gap models. For. Ecol. Manage. 42: 95-110.
48. Wooldridge, J.M. 2000. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western College, Cincinnati, Ohio.
49. Wykoff, W.R., Crookston, N.L., and Stage, A.R. 1982. User's guide to the stand prognosis model. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR-INT-133.
50. Zenner, E. K. 2005. Development of tree size distributions in Douglas-fir forests under differing disturbance regimes. Ecol. Appl. 15(2): 701-714.