Integrating variation in tree growth into forest planning

Silva Fennica

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 11-25

  Pasanen, Kari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

ARMA models; Growth index; Risk; Scenario approach

Indexed keywords

FOREST PLANNING; GROWTH MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BETULA PENDULA; BETULA PUBESCENS; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0031849982     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.697     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boman, A. 1927. Männyn kasvun monivuotisista vaihteluista. Acta Forestalia Fennica 32(4).
2. Box, G.E.P. & Jenkins, G.M. 1976. Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Revised edition. Holden-Day, San Francisco.
3. Brazee, R. & Mendelsohn, R. 1988. Timber harvesting with fluctuating prices. Forest Science 34: 359-372.
4. Brumelle, S., Stanbury, W.T., Thompson, W.A., Vertinsky, I. & Wehrung, D. 1990. Framework for the analysis of risks in forest management and silvicultural investments. Forest Ecology and Management 35: 279-299.
5. Cajander, A.K. 1926. The theory of forest types. Acta Forestalia Fennica 29(3).
6. Caulfield, J.P. 1988. A stochastic efficiency approach for determining the economic rotation of a forest stand. Forest Science 34: 441-457.
7. Chatfieid, C. 1980. The analysis of time series: an introduction. 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, London-New York. 268 p.
8. Henttonen, H. 1984. The dependence of annual ring indices on some climatic factors. Acta Forestalia Fennica 186. 38 p.
9. _ 1990. Variation in the diameter growth of Norway Spruce in Southern Finland. Helsingin yliopiston metsänarvioimistieteen laitoksen tiedonantoja 25. 88 p.
10. Hoganson, M.H. & Rose, D.W. 1987. A model for recognizing forestwide risk in timber management scheduling. Forest Science 33: 220-238.
11. Kaya, I. & Buongiorno, J. 1987. Economic harvesting of uneven-aged northern hardwood stands under risk: a Markovian decision model. Forest Science 33: 889-907.
12. Kennedy, W.J. & Gentle, J.E. 1980. Statistical computing. Marcel Dekker, New York.
13. Marshall, P.L. 1988. A procedure for constructing timber management strategies under uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 398-405.
14. Mendoza, G.A. & Sprouse, W. 1989. Forest planning and decision making in fuzzy environments: an overview and illustration. Forest Science 35: 481-502.
15. Mielikäinen, K. 1991. Kasvun kertomaa. Käytännön maamies 5/91.
16. Mikola, P. 1950. On variations in tree growth and their significance to growth studies. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 38(5).
17. Monserud, R.A. 1986. Time-series analyses of treering chronologies. Forest Science 32: 349-372.
18. Pukkala, T. 1983. Ilmastotekijöiden ja siementuotannon vaikutus kuusen ja männyn sädekasvuun. Metsänhoitotieteen lisensiaattityö. Joensuu.
19. _ 1993. Monikäytön suunnitteluohjelma MONSU. Mimeograph. University of Joensuu. 42 p.
20. _ & Kangas, J. 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8: 560-570.
21. _ & Kangas, J. 1996. A method to integrate risk and risk attitude into forest planning. Forest Science 42(2): 198-205.
22. Tiihonen, P. 1984. Growth variation in the Forestry Board Districts of Pohjois-Karjala and Pohjois-Savo according to the 7th National Forest Inventory. Folia Forestalia 588. 8 p.
23. Valsta, L. 1992. Stand management optimization based on growth simulators. Forest Science 38: 430-447.
24. Visser, H. & Molenaar, J. 1990. Estimating trends in tree-ring data. Forest Science 36: 87-100.
25. Vuokila, Y. 1960. On growth and its variations in thinned and unthinned Scots pine stands. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 52(7).