Development of vapor deposited silica sol-gel particles for use as a bioactive materials system

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 101 A, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1682-1693

  Snyder, Katherine L ^a   Holmes, Hallie R ^a   Vanwagner, Michael J ^a   Hartman, Natalie J ^a   Rajachar, Rupak M ^a  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

nanoparticles; osteoblasts; silica sol gel; surface modification; vapor deposition

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; CELL-MATERIAL INTERACTION; MANUFACTURING PARAMETERS; NANO- AND MICRO-PARTICLES; SILICA SOL GELS; SUBSTRATE SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE HYDROPHOBICITY; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD;

CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTACT ANGLE; DEPOSITS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; NANOPARTICLES; OSTEOBLASTS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SILICA; SOL-GEL PROCESS; SOL-GELS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE TREATMENT; VAPOR DEPOSITION; VAPORS;

SUBSTRATES;

BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM ION; NANOPARTICLE; PHOSPHATE; SILICA SOL GEL PARTICLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BODY FLUID; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MOUSE; NEBULIZER; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VAPOR;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL LINE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; IONS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORGANOSILICON COMPOUNDS; OSTEOBLASTS; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE TRANSITION; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOLUTIONS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VOLATILIZATION; WATER;

EID: 84876290540     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34471     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Elias C, Oshida Y, Lima J, Muller C,. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2008; 1: 234-242.
2. Schuler M, Owen G, Hamilton D, de Wild M, Textor M, Brunette D, Tosatti S,. Biomimetic modification of titanium dental implant model surfaces using the RGDSP-peptide sequence: A cell morphology study. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4003-4015.
3. Vasudev D, Ricci J, Sabatino C, Li P, Parsons J,. In vivo evaluation of a biomimetic apatitie coating grown on titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 69: 629-636.
4. Heimann R, Wirth R,. Formation and transformation of amorphous calcium phosphates on titatnium alloy surfaces during atmospheric plasma spraying and their subsequent in vitro performance. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 823-831.
5. Park E, Condrate R, Lee D, Kociba K, Gallagher P,. Characterization of hydroxyappatitie: Before and after plasma spraying. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002; 13: 211-218.
6. Xiao F, Peng L, Zhang Y, Yun L,. Silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite composite coating by using vacuum-plasma spraying and its interaction with human serum albumin. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 1653-1658.
7. Yang Y, Kim K, Ong J,. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process-An alternative to plasma spraying. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 327-337.
8. Gil F, Aparicio C, Manerio J, Padros A,. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 583-590.
9. Galluccio G,. Variability of the dental surface: Effects on orthopedic treatment. Prog Orthodont 2008; 9: 18 -24.
10. Kim J, Kim L, Kim C,. Size control of silica nanoparticles and their surface treatment for fabrication of dental nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8: 215-222.
11. Kadoma Y,. Surface treatment agent for dental metals using a thiirane monomer and a phosphoric acid monomer. Dental Mater J 2002; 21: 156-169.
12. Li D, Liu B, Zou J, Xu K,. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implants by a modified sandblasting surface treatment: An in vivo interfacial mechanics study. Implant Dent 1999; 8: 289-294.
13. Langer R, Vacanti J, Vacanti C, Atala A, Freed L, Vunjak-Novakovic G,. Tissue engineering: Biomedical applications. Tissue Eng 1995; 1: 151-161.
14. Putnam A, Mooney D,. Tissue engineering using synthetic extracellular matrices. Nat Mater 1996; 2: 824-826.
15. Ratner B, Bryant S,. Biomaterials: Where we have been and where we are going. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004; 6: 41-75.
16. Hench LL,. Bioactive materials: The potential for tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 41: 511-518.
17. Hench LL, West JK,. The sol-gel process. Chem Rev 1990; 90: 33-72.
18. Gupta R, Kumar A,. Bioactive materials for biomedical applications using sol-gel technology. Biomed Mater 2008; 3: 034005.
19. Coradin T, Boissire M, Livage J,. Sol-gel chemistry in medicinal science. Curr Med Chem 2006; 13: 99-108.
20. Hong Z, Reis RL, Mano JF,. Preparation and in vitro characterization of novel bioactive glass ceramic nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 88: 304-313.
21. Kortesuo P, Ahola M, Kangas M, Jokinen M, Leino T, Vuorilehto L, Laakso S, Kiesvaara J, Yli-Urpo A, Marvola M,. Effect of synthesis parameters of the sol-gel-processed spray-dried silica gel microparticles on the release rate of dexmedetomidine. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2795-2801.
22. Nicoll SB, Radin S, Santos EM, Tuan RS, Ducheyne P,. In vitro release kinetics of biologically active transforming growth factor-beta 1 from a novel porous glass carrier. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 853-859.
23. Chen J, Tang J, Yan F, Ju H,. A gold nanoparticles/sol-gel composite architecture for encapsulation of immunoconjugate for reagentless electrochemical immunoassay. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2313-2321.
24. Pierre A, Bonnet J, Vekris A, Portier J,. Encapsulation of deoxyribonucleic acid molecules in silica and hybrid organic-silica gels. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001; 12: 51-55.
25. Nieto A, Areva S, Wilson T, Viitala R, Vallet-Regi M,. Cell viability in a wet silica gel. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 3478-3487.
26. Hoppe A, Güldal NS, Boccaccini AR,. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 2757-2774.
27. Rahman MN, Day DE, Bal BS, Fu Q, Jung SB, Bonewald LF,. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 2355-2373.
28. Hench LL, Xynos ID, Polak JM,. Bioactive glasses for in situ tissue regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2004; 15: 543-562.
29. Jell G, Stevens MM,. Gene activation by bioactive glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006; 17: 997-1002.
30. Newman S, Pellow P, Clarke S,. Droplet size distribution of nebulized aerosols for inhalation therapy. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1986; 7: 139-146.
31. O'Callaghan C, Barry P,. The science of nebulized drug delivery. Thorax 1997; 52: S31-S44.
32. Le Brun PPH, de Boer AH, Heijerman HGM, Frijlink HW,. A review of the technical aspects of drug nebulization. Pharmacy World Sci 2000; 22: 75-81.
33. Newman S, Pellow P, Clarke S,. Drop sizes from medical atomizers for drug solutions with different viscosites and surface tensions. Atom Spray Technol 1987; 3: 1-11.
34. Brinker CJ, Scherer GW,. Sol-Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc; 1990.
35. Huang Y-Y, Chou K-S,. Studies on the spin coating process of silica films. Ceram Int 2003; 29: 485-493.
36. Kobayashi M, Olding T, Sayer MCKJ,. Piezoelectric thick film ultrasonic transducers fabricated by a sol-gel spray technique. Ultrasonics 2002; 39: 675-680.
37. Linnes MP, Ratner BD, Giachelli CM,. A fibrinogen-based precision microporous scaffold for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 5298-5306.
38. Osathanon T, Linnes ML, Rajachar RM, Ratner BD, Somerman MJ, Giachelli CM,. Microporous nanofibrous fibrin-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 4091-4099.
39. Osathanon T, Giachelli C, Somerman M,. Immobilization of alkaline phosphatase on microporous nanofibrous fibrin scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009; 2009: 27.
40. Steele J, Dalton B, Johnson G, Underwood P,. Polystyrene chemistry affects vitronectin activity: An explanation for cell attachment to tissue culture polystyrene but not to unmodified polystyrene. J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 927-940.
41. Teare D, Emmison N, Ton-That C, Bradley R,. Cellular attachment to ultraviolet ozone modified polystyrene surfaces. Langmuir 2000; 16: 2818-2824.
42. Curtis A, Forrester J, McInnes C, Lawrie F,. Adhesion of cells to polystyrene surfaces. J Cell Biol 1983; 97: 1500-1506.
43. Vogler EA,. Water and the acute biological response to surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1999; 10: 1015-1045.
44. Roach P, Eglin D, Rohde K, Perry C,. Modern biomaterials: A review-bulk properties and implications of surface modifications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 1263-1277.
45. Liu X, Lim J, Donahue H, Dhurjati R, Mastro A, Vogler E,. Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4535-4550.
46. Kunzler TP, Drobek T, Schuler M, Spencer ND,. Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2175-2182.
47. Ricci JL, Grew JC, Alexander H,. Connective-tissue responses to defined biomaterial surfaces. I. Growth of rat fibroblast and bone marrow cell colonies on microgrooved substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 85: 313-325.
48. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC,. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007; 6: 997-1003.
49. Maeno S, Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Morioka H, Yatabe T, Funayama A, Toyama Y, Taguchi T, Tanaka J,. The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3D culture. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4847-4855.
50. Beck GR,. Inorganic phosphate as a signaling molecule in osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Biochem 2003; 90: 234-243.