Improvement of Osseointegration of Titanium Dental Implants by a Modified Sandblasting Surface Treatment: An in Vivo Interfacial Biomechanics Study

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 289-294

  Li, D H ^a   Liu, B L ^a   Zou, J C ^b   Xu, K W ^c  

^a Qindu Stomatological College   (China)

^b FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acid attack; Interfacial mechanics; Sandblast; Titanium dental implant

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL CARE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DOG; IMPLANT; MALE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DEVICE REMOVAL; DOGS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TITANIUM;

EID: 0033256748     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199903000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Li D-H, Liu B-L. The historical review of titanium dental implants' rough surfaces. Stomatol Part Overseas Med. 1994;21:331-335.
2. Li D-H, Liu B-L, Zou J-C, et al. The improvement of the osseointegration of dental implants by the modified sandblasting surface treatment: A histological in vivo study. Practical J Stomatol. In press.
3. Goftrodsen K, Wennerberg A, Jonhansson C, et al. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29: 1223-1231.
4. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, et al. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1567-1575.
5. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, eds. Clinical Implants Materials, Advances in Biomaterials, Vol 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1990:309-315.
6. Buser D, Schenk KK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991; 25:889-902.
7. Gross U, Muller-Mai CH, Fritz Th, et al. Implant surface roughness on the mode of load transmission and periimplant bone structure. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, eds. Clinical Implant Materials. Advances in Biomaterials, Vol 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1990:303-308.
8. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, et al. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981;9:15-25.
9. Asaoka K, Kuwayama N. Mechanical properties and biomechanical compatibility of porous titanium for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985;19: 699-713.
10. Listgarten MA, Buser D, Steinemann SG, et al. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated epoxy resin implants and bone or gingiva. J Dent Res. 1992;71:364-371.
11. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al. Dental implant design on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991; 25:467-483.