Potential of texture-based classification in urban landscapes using multispectral aerial photos

South African Journal of Science

Volumn 109, Issue 3-4, 2013, Pages

  Mhangara, Paidamwoyo ^a   Odindi, John ^b  

^a SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL SPACE AGENCY   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Aerial photograph; Land cover; Multispectral; Object based; Urban

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TEXTURE; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84876214728     PISSN: 00382353     EISSN: 19967489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/sajs.2013/1273     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E. Change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sens. 2003;25(12):2365-2407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 0143116031000139863 (Pubitemid 38973496)
2. Xie Y, Sha Z, Yu M. Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: A review. J Ecol. 2008;1(1):9-23.
3. Odindi J, Mhangara P, Kakembo V. Remote sensing land-cover change in Port Elizabeth during South Africa's democratic transition. S Afr J Sci. 2012;108(5/6), Art. #886, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v108i5/6.886
4. Jensen Jr. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005.
5. Mas JF, Flores JJ. The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data. Int J Remote Sens. 2008;29(3):617-663.
6. Breiman L. Classification and regression trees. London: Chapman and Hall/ CRC; 1984.
7. Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J Photogramm. 2011;66:247-259.
8. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning. 1996;24(2):123-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655 (Pubitemid 126724382)
9. Kotsiantis S. Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Informatica, 2007;31:249-268. (Pubitemid 350208045)
10. Huang C, Davis LS, Townshend JRG. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens. 2002;23(4):725-749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160110040323 (Pubitemid 34119904)
11. Rogan J, Miller J, Stow D, Franklin J, Levien L, Fischer C. Land cover change monitoring with classification trees using Landsat TM and ancillary data. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 2003;69(7):784-793.
12. Atkinson P, Tatnall A. Introduction neural networks in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens. 1997;18(4):699-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014311697218700 (Pubitemid 27269964)
13. Foody GM. Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 2004;70(5):627-633. (Pubitemid 39081774)
14. Swain PH, Davis SM. Remote sensing: The quantitative approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
15. Gong P, Howarth PJ. Frequency-based contextual classification and grey level vector reduction for land-use identification. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 1992;58:423-437.
16. Wang L, Sousa WP, Gong P, Biging GS. Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of Panama. Remote Sens Environ. 2004;91:432-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. rse.2004.04.005 (Pubitemid 38791557)
17. Agüera F, Aguilar FJ, Aguilar MA. Using texture analysis to improve per-pixel classification of very high resolution images for mapping plastic greenhouses. ISPRS J Photogramm. 2008;63:635-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. isprsjprs.2008.03.003
18. Webb R. Statistical pattern recognition. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470854774
19. Lee JY, Warner TA. Image classification with regional based approach in high spatial resolution imagery. XXth ISPRS Congress; 2004 July 12-23; Istanbul, Turkey. London: ISPRS; 2004. p. 1-6.
20. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Texture features for image classification. IEEE T Syst Man CYA. 1973;3(6):610-621. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
21. Miller J, Franklin J, Aspinall R. Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models. Ecol Model. 2007:202:225-242. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.012 (Pubitemid 46356707)
22. Haack B, Bryant N, Adams S. An assessment of Landsat MSS and TM data for urban and near urban land-cover digital classification. Remote Sens Environ. 1987;21:201-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90053-8
23. Zhang Q, Wang J. Texture analysis for urban spatial pattern study using SPOT imagery. IEEE T Geosci Remote. 2001;28(4):513-519.
24. Barnsley M, Barr S. Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using kernel-based spatial reclassification. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 1996;62:949-958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft. 2011.05.012
25. Caridade CMR, Marçal ARS, Mendonça T. The use of texture for image classification of black and white air-photographs. Int J Remote Sens. 2008;29(2):593-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014311607 01281015
26. Mather PM. Land cover classification revisited. In: Tate PM, Tate NJ, editors. Advanced remote sensing and GIS analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 1999. p. 7-16.
27. Haralick RM, Shapiro LG. Image segmentation techniques. Comput Vision Graph. 1985;29:100-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0734-189X(85)90153-7
28. De Kok R, Schneider T, Ammer U. Object based classification application in the Alpine forest environment. In: Fusion of sensor data, knowledge sources and algorithms. Proceedings of the Joint ISPRS/Earsel Workshop; 1999 June 3-4; Valladolid, Spain. International Archives and Remote Sensing, 32 Part 7-4-3 W6.
29. Flanders D, Hall-Bayer M, Pereverzoff J. Preliminary evaluation of eCognition object based software for cut block delineation and feature extraction. Can J Remote Sens. 2003;29:441-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.5589/m03- 006
30. Benz U, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm. 2004;58:239-258. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002 (Pubitemid 38106043)
31. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm. 2010;65(1):2-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. isprsjprs.2009.06.004
32. Pal NR, Pal SK. A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recogn. 1993;26:1277-1294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(93)90135-J
33. Geneletti D. A method for object-oriented land cover classification combining Landsat TM data and aerial photographs. Int J Remote Sens. 2003;24(6):1273-1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160210144499 (Pubitemid 36447160)
34. Walter V. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS J Photogramm. 2004;58:225-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. isprsjprs.2003.09.007 (Pubitemid 38106042)
35. Niemeyer I, Marpu PR, Nussbaum S. Change detection using object features. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ, editors. Object based image analysis. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 169-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540- 77058-9-10
36. Gao Y, Mas J, Maathuis BH, Xiangmin Z, Van Dijk PM. Comparisons of pixel based and object oriented image classification approaches - A case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens. 2012;27(18):4039-4055.
37. Carieer AP, Debeir O, Wolff E. Assessment of very high spatial resolution satellite image segmentations. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 2005;17:1285-1294. (Pubitemid 41567298)
38. Blostein D, Ahuja N. A multi scale region detector. Comput Vision Graph. 1989;45:22-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(89)90068-6
39. Haralick RM. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE. 1979;67:786-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1979.11328
40. Smits PC, Annoni A. Upadating land-cover maps by using texture information from very high resolution space-borne imagery. IEEE T Geosci Remote. 1999;37:1244-1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.763282
41. Zhang Q, Wang J, Gong P, Shi P. Study of urban spatial patterns from SPOT panchromatic imagery using textural analysis. Int J Remote Sens. 2003;24:4137-4160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000070445 (Pubitemid 37447108)
42. Pu R, Landry S, Yu Q. Object-based urban detailed land cover classification with high spatial resolution IKONOS imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 2011;32(12):3285-3308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161003745657
43. Mathieu R, Aryal J, Chong AK. Object-based classification of IKONOS imagery for mapping large-scale vegetation communities in urban areas. Sensors. 2007;7:2860-2880. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s7112860
44. Nussbaum S, Niemeyer I. Canty MJ. Feature recognition in the context of automated object-oriented analysis of remote sensing data monitoring the Iranian nuclear sites. Proceedings of SPIE's Europe Symposium Optics and Photonics for Defense and Security; 2005 Oct 21. doi:10.1117/12.629581
45. Estes J, Belward A, Loveland T, Scepan J, Strahler A, Townshend J, Justice C. The way foward. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 1999:65;1089-1093.
46. Konecny G. Geoinformation: Remote sensing, photogrammetry and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis; 2003. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203469644
47. Ferro CJ, Warner TA. Scale and texture in digital image classification. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 2002:68(1);51-63. (Pubitemid 34096274)
48. Foody GM. The continuum of classification fuzziness in thematic mapping. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 1999;65:443-451. (Pubitemid 29174720)
49. Rodriguez-Giliano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JP. An assessment of effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J Photogramm. 2012;67:93-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. isprsjprs.2011.11.002
50. Steele B, Winne JC, Redmond R. Estimating and mapping miscalculation probabilities for thematic land cover maps. Remote Sens Environ. 1998;66:192-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00061-3 (Pubitemid 29360728)
51. Baatz M, Schape A. Multiresolution segmentation: An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Strobl J, editor. Proceedings of the Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII. Salzburg, Austria: Beiträge zum AGITSymposium; 2000. p. 12-23.
52. Mausel PW, Kramber WJ, Lee JK. Optimum band selection for supervised classification of multispectral data. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 1990;56:55-60. (Pubitemid 20646367)
53. Nussbaum S, Menz G. Object-based image analysis and treaty verification: New approaches in remote sensing applied to nuclear facilities in Iran. Heidelberg: Springer; 2008.
54. Grenier M, Labrecque S, Benoit M, Allard M. Accuracy assessment method for wetland object-based classification. In: Hay GJ, Blaschke T, Marceau D, editors. Geographic object based image analysis for the 21st Century. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Vol. XXXVIII-4/C1. Calgary: University of Calgary; 2008. p. 285-289.
55. Congalton R, Green. K. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Lewis Press; 1999.
56. Chen D, Stow DA, Gong P. Examining the effect of spatial resolution and texture window size on classification accuracy: An urban environment case. Int J Remote Sens. 2004;25:2177-2192. http://dx.doi.org/101080/1431160310001618464 (Pubitemid 38762499)
57. Ozdemir I, David A, Norton DA, Ozkan UY, Mert A, Ozdemir S. Estimation of tree size diversity using object oriented texture analysis and ASTER Imagery. Sensors. 2008;8:4709-4724. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8084709
58. Lu D, Weng Q. Extraction of urban impervious surface from an IKONOS image. Int J Remote Sens. 2009;30(5):1297-1311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 01431160802508985
59. Jensen Jr. Remote sensing of the environment: An earth resources perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2007.