The continuum of classification fuzziness in thematic mapping

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 443-451

  Foody, Giles M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUZZY MATHEMATICS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; REMOTE SENSING; THEMATIC MAPPING;

EID: 0033005338     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Abrams, M., R. Bianchi, and D. Pieri, 1996. Revised mapping of lava flows on Mount Etna, Sicily, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:1353-1359.
2. Aplin, P., P.M. Atkinson, and P.J. Curran, 1997. Fine spatial resolution satellite sensors for the next decade, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18:1387-1381.
3. Arai, K., 1992. A supervised Thematic Mapper classification with a purification of training samples, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13:2039-2049.
4. Barnsley, M., and P. Hobson, 1996. Making sense of sensors, GIS Europe, 5(5):34-36.
5. Bernard, A.C., I. Kanellopoulos, and G.G. Wilkinson, 1996. Neural network classification of mixtures, Soft Computing in Remote Sensing Data Analysis (E. Binaghi, P.A. Brivio, and A. Rampini, editors), World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 53-63.
6. Bowers, T.L., and L.C. Rowan, 1996. Remote mineralogic and lithologic mapping of the Ice River alkaline complex, British Columbia, Canada, using AVIRIS data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:1379-1385.
7. Campbell, J.B., 1996. Introduction to Remote Sensing, Second Edition, Taylor and Francis, London.
8. Cannon, R.L., J.V. Dave, J.C. Bezdek, and M.M. Trivedi, 1986. Segmentation of a thematic mapper image using the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 24:400-408.
9. Canters, F., 1997. Evaluating the uncertainty of area estimates derived from fuzzy land-cover classification, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63:403-414.
10. Cohen, J., 1968. Weighted kappa, Psychological Bulletin, 70:213-220.
11. Congalton, R.G., 1988. A comparison of sampling schemes used in generating error matrices for assessing the accuracy of maps generated from remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 54:593-600.
12. Corves, C., and C.J. Place, 1994. Mapping the reliability of satellite-derived landcover maps - An example from central Brazilian Amazon Basin, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15: 1283-1294.
13. Crapper, P.F., 1984. An estimate of the number of boundary cells in a mapped landscape coded to grid cells, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 50:1497-1503.
14. Cushnie, J.L., 1987. The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 8: 15-29.
15. Fisher, P.F., 1997. The pixel: A snare and a delusion, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18:679-685.
16. Fisher, P.F., and S. Pathirana, 1990. The evaluation of fuzzy membership of land cover classes in the suburban zone, Remote Sensing of Environment, 34:121-132.
17. Foody, G.M., 1995. Fully fuzzy supervised image classification, RSS'95: Remote Sensing in Action, Remote Sensing Society, Nottingham, pp. 1187-1194.
18. _, 1996. Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17:1317-1340.
19. _, 1997. Fully fuzzy supervised classification of land cover from remotely sensed imagery with an artificial neural network, Neural Computing and Applications, 5:238-247.
20. _, 1999. Image classification with a neural network: From completely-crisp to fully fuzzy situations, Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis (P.M. Atkinson and N. Tate, editors), Wiley, Chichester (in press).
21. Foody, G.M., and M.K. Arora, 1996. Incorporating mixed pixels in the training, allocation and testing stages of supervised classifications, Pattern Recognition Letters, 17:1389-1398.
22. Foody, G.M., G. Palubinskas, R.M. Lucas, P.J. Curran, and M. Honzak, 1996. Identifying terrestrial carbon sinks: Classification of successional stages in regenerating tropical forest from Landsat TM data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 55:205-216.
23. Foody, G.M., R.M. Lucas, P.J. Curran, and M. Honzak, 1997. Non-linear mixture modelling without end-members using an artificial neural network, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18: 937-953.
24. Foschi, P.G., and D.K. Smith, 1997. Detecting subpixel woody vegetation in digital imagery using two artificial intelligence approaches, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63: 493-500.
25. Gong, P., R. Pu, and J. Chen, 1996. Mapping ecological land systems and classification uncertainties from digital elevation and forest-cover data using neural networks, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:1249-1260.
26. Gopal, S., and C. Woodcock, 1994. Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60:181-188.
27. Harris, P.M., and S.J. Ventura, 1995. The integration of geographic data with remotely sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61:993-998.
28. Hlavka, C.A., and M.A. Spanner, 1995. Unmixing AVHRR imagery to assess clearcuts and forest regrowth in Oregon, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33:788-795.
29. Joria, P.E., and J.C. Jorgenson, 1996. Comparison of three methods for mapping Tundra with Landsat digital data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:163-169.
30. Kanellopoulos, I., A. Varfis, G.G. Wilkinson, and J. Megier, 1992. Land-cover discrimination in SPOT HRV imagery using an artificial neural network - A 20-class experiment, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13:917-924.
31. Kent, J.T., and K.V. Mardia, 1988. Spatial classification using fuzzy membership models, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10:659-671.
32. Klir, G.J., and T.A. Folger, 1988. Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty and Information, Prentice-Hall International, London.
33. Lo, C.P., 1986. Applied Remote Sensing, Longman, Harlow.
34. Maselli, F., C. Conese, and L. Petkov, 1994. Use of probability entropy for the estimation and graphical representation of the accuracy of maximum likelihood classifications, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 49:13-20.
35. Mather, P.M., 1987. Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images, Wiley, Chichester.
36. Metzler, M.D., and R.C. Cicone, 1983. Assessment of technologies for classification of mixed pixels, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, ERIM, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 3:1015-1021.
37. Openshaw, S., 1996. Fuzzy logic as a new scientific paradigm for doing geography, Environment and Planning A, 28:761-768.
38. Schowengerdt, R.A., 1996. Soft classification and spatial-spectral mixing, Soft Computing in Remote Sensing Data Analysis (E. Binaghi, P.A. Brivio, and A. Rampini, editors), World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 1-6.
39. _, 1997. Remote Sensing. Models and Methods for Image Processing, Second Edition, Academic Press, San Diego.
40. Townshend, J.R.G., 1981. The spatial resolving power of Earth resources satellites, Progress in Physical Geography, 5:32-55.
41. _, 1992. Land cover, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13:1319-1328.
42. van der Wel, F.J.M., L.C. van der Gaag, and B.G.H. Gorte, 1998. Visual exploration of uncertainty in remote sensing classification, Computers and Geosciences, 24:335-343.
43. van Deusen, P.C., 1996. Unbiased estimates of class proportions from thematic maps, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:409-412.
44. Veregin, H., 1996. Error propagation through the buffer operation for probability surfaces, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:419-428.
45. Wang, F., 1990a. Improving remote sensing image analysis through fuzzy information representation, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56:1163-1169.
46. _, 1990b. Fuzzy supervised classification of remote sensing images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28: 194-201.
47. Warner, T.A., and M. Shank, 1997. An evaluation of the potential for fuzzy classification of multispectral data using artificial neural networks, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63: 1285-1294.
48. Wilkinson, G.G., 1996. Classification algorithms - Where next? Soft Computing in Remote Sensing Data Analysis (E. Binaghi, P.A. Brivio, and A. Rampini, editors), World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 93-99.
49. Woodcock, C.E., and S. Gopal, 1995. Remote sensing of forests: New data layers for GIS, Proceedings 1995 ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition, ACSM/ASPRS, Bethesda, Maryland, 2:420-428.
50. Woodcock, C.E., S. Gopal, and W. Albert, 1996. Evaluation of the potential for providing secondary labels in vegetation maps, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:393-399.
51. Zhang, J., and G.M. Foody, 1998. A fuzzy classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery, International Journal of Remote Sensing 19:2721-2738.