Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using Kernel-based spatial reclassification

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 949-958

  Bamsley, M J ^a,b   Barr, S L ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE CLASSIFICATION; SATELLITE IMAGING; SATELLITE SENSOR; URBAN AREA; URBAN LAND USE;

UK, ENGLAND, LONDON;

EID: 0030458167     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Atkinson, P., J.L. Cushnie, J.R.G. Townshend, and A.K. Wilson, 1985. Improving Thematic Mapper land cover classification using filtered data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6:955-961.
2. Baraldi, A., and F. Parmiggiani, 1990. Urban area classification by multispectral SPOT images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28:674-680.
3. Barnsley, M.J., S.L. Barr, A. Hamid, J-P. Muller, G.J. Sadler, and J.W. Shepherd, 1993. Analytical tools to monitor urban areas, Geographical Information Handling -Research and Applications (P. Mather, editor), John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 147-184.
4. Barnsley, M.J., and S.L. Barr, 1992. Developing kernel-based spatial re-classification techniques for improved land-use monitoring using high spatial resolution images, Proc. XXIX Conference of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS'92), International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing : Commission 7, Washington D.C., 2-14 August 1992, pp. 646-654.
5. Barnsley, M.J., S.L. Barr, and G.J. Sadler, 1991. Spatial re-classification of remotely sensed images for urban land use monitoring, Proceedings of Spatial Data 2000, Oxford, 17-20 September, Remote Sensing Society, Nottingham, pp. 106-117.
6. Barnsley, M.J., G.J. Sadler, and J.S. Shepherd, 1989. Integrating remotely-sensed images and digital map data in the context of urban planning, Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society, Bristol, U.K., 13-15 September, Remote Sensing Society, Nottingham, pp. 25-32.
7. Barr, S.L., 1992. Object-based re-classification of high resolution digital imagery for urban land use monitoring, Proc. XXIX Conference of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS'92), International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing : Commission 7. Washington D.C., 2-14 August, pp. 969-976.
8. Barr, S.L., and M.J. Barnsley, 1993. Object-based spatial analytical tools for urban land-use monitoring in a raster processing environment, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Geographical Information Systems (EGIS'93), Genoa, Italy, April, pp. 810-822.
9. Chen, P.G., and T. Pavlidis, 1979. Segmentation by texture using a co-occurrence matrix and a split-and-merge algorithm, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 10:172-182.
10. Civco, D.C., 1993. Artificial neural networks for land-cover classification and mapping, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7:173-186.
11. Congalton, R.G., R.G. Oderwald, and R.A. Mead, 1983. Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate statistical techniques, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 49:1671-1678.
12. Dryer, P., 1993. Classification of land cover using optimized neural nets on SPOT data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 59:617-621.
13. Ehlers, M., D. Greenlee, T. Smith, and Star, 1991. Integration of remote sensing and GIS: Data and data access, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 57:669-675.
14. Eyton, J.R., 1993. Urban land use classification and modelling using cover-type frequencies, Applied Geography, 13:111-121.
15. Forster, B.C., 1980. Urban residential ground cover using Landsat digital data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 46:547-558.
16. _, 1984. Combining ancillary and spectral data for urban applications. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. 55-67.
17. _, 1985. An examination of some problems and solutions in monitoring urban areas from satellite platforms. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6:139-151.
18. Franklin, S.E., and D.R. Peddle, 1990. Classification of SPOT-HRV imagery and texture features, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11:551-556.
19. Gastellu-Etchegorry, J.P., 1990. An assessment of SPOT XS and Landsat MSS data for digital classification of near-urban land cover, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11:225-235.
20. Gong, P., and P.J. Howarth, 1990. The use of structural information for improving land-cover classification accuracies at the rural-urban fringe, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56:67-73.
21. _, 1992. Frequency-based contextual classification and gray-level vector reduction for land-use identification, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58:423-437.
22. Guo, Liu Jian, and J. McM. Moore, 1991. Post-classification processing for thematic mapping based on remotely-sensed image data: Proceedings of the International Conference of IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, Espoo, Finland, 3-7 June, IEEE, New York, pp. 2203-2206.
23. Gurney, C.M., 1981. The use of contextual information to improve land cover classification of digital remotely sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2:379-388.
24. Gurney, C.M., and J.R.G. Townshend, 1983. The use of contextual information in the classification of remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 49:55-64.
25. Haack, B., N. Bryant, and S. Adams, 1987. An assessment of Landsat MSS and TM data for urban and near-urban land-cover digital classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 21:201-213.
26. Haralick, R.M., 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture, Proceedings of the IEEE, 67:786-804.
27. Hepner, G.F., T. Logan, N. Ritter, and N. Bryant, 1990. Artificial neural network classification using a minimal training set: Comparison to conventional supervised classification, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56:469-473.
28. Jackson, M.J., P. Carter, T.F. Smith, and W. Gardner, 1980. Urban land mapping from remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 46:1041-1050.
29. Kanellopoulos, I., A. Varfis, G.G. Wilkinson, and J. Megier, 1992. Land-cover discrimination in SPOT HRV imagery using an artificial neural network - A 20-class experiment, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13:917-924.
30. Li, K., and J-P. Muller, 1991. Segmenting satellite imagery: A region growing scheme. Proceedings of the Conference of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society (IGARSS'91), Vol. 2, Espoo, Finland, pp. 1075-1078.
31. Martin, L.R.G., P.J. Howarth, and G. Holder, 1988. Multispectral classification of land use at the rural-urban fringe using SPOT data, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 14:72-79.
32. Mather, P.M., 1987. Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images, John Wiley, London, pp. 289-309.
33. Mehldau, G., and R.A. Schowengerdt, 1990. A C-extension for rule-based image classification systems, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 56:887-892.
34. Moeller-Jensen, L., 1990. Knowledge-based classification of an urban area using texture and context information in a Landsat-TM image, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56:899-904.
35. Murphy, D.L., 1985, Estimating neighborhood variability with a binary comparison matrix, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 51:667-674.
36. Robinove, C.J., 1986. Spatial diversity index mapping of classes in grid cell maps, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 52:1171-1173.
37. Rosenfield, G.H., and K. Fitzpatrick-Lins, 1986. A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52:223-227.
38. Sadler, G.J., and M.J. Barnsley. 1990. Use of population density data to improve classification accuracies in remotely-sensed images of urban areas, Proceedings of the First European Conference on Geographical Information Systems (EGIS'90), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 10-13 April, EGIS Foundation, Utrecht, pp. 968-977.
39. Sadler, G.J., M.J. Barnsley, and S.L. Barr, 1991. Information extraction from remotely-sensed images for urban land analysis, Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Geographical Information Systems (EGIS'91), Brussels, Belgium, April, EGIS Foundation, Utrecht, pp. 955-964.
40. Thomas, I.L., 1980. Spatial post-processing of spectrally classified Landsat data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 46:1201-1206.
41. Toll, D.L., 1985. Effect of Landsat Thematic Mapper sensor parameters on land cover classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 17:129-140.
42. Turner, M.G., 1989. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process, Annual Review Ecological Systems, 20:171-197.
43. Wang, Y., and D. Civco, 1992. Spatial modeling-based post-classification of satellite remote sensing data for improved land cover mapping, Proc. ASPRS/ACSM/RT'92 Convention. Washington, D.C., 4:122-132.
44. _, 1992. Post-classification of misclassified pixels by evidential reasoning: A GIS approach for improving classification accuracy of remote sensing data, Proc. ASPRS/ACSM/RT'92 Convention, Washington, D.C., 4:160-170.
45. Wharton, S.W., 1982a. A contextual classification method for recognizing land use patterns in high resolution remotely-sensed data, Pattern Recognition, 15:317-324.
46. _, 1982b. A context-based land use classification algorithm for high resolution remotely sensed data, Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 8:46-50.
47. Whitehouse, S., 1990. A spatial land-use classification of an urban environment using high-resolution multispectral satellite data, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society, Remote Sensing and Global Change, Swansea, U.K., 19-21 September, Remote Sensing Society, Nottingham, pp. 433-437.
48. Woodcock, C.E., and A.H. Strahler, 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, 21:311-332.