Rethinking strategy instruction: Direct reading strategy instruction versus computer-based guided practice

Journal of Research in Reading

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 223-240

  Lenhard, Wolfgang ^a   Baier, Herbert ^a   Endlich, Darius ^a   Schneider, Wolfgang ^a   Hoffmann, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876090955     PISSN: 01410423     EISSN: 14679817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01505.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Artelt, C., McElvany, N., Christmann, U., Richter, T., Groeben, N., Köster, J. et al. (2007). Förderung von Lesekompetenz [Promotion of reading competence]. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). Verfügbar unter: http://www.bmbf.de/pub/bildungsreform_band_siebzehn.pdf
2. Auer, M., Gruber, G., Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2005). Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen 5-8 (SLS 5-8) [Reading screening, Grade 5 to 8]. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber. doi: 10.3102/00346543061002213.
3. Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 77-95). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Bangert-Downs, R., Kulik, C.-L., Kulik, J. & Morgan, M.T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in testlike events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
5. Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. & Mastropieri, M. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995-2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 423-436. doi: 10.1177/0741932509355988.
6. Berry, M.W., Dumais, S.T. & O'Brien, G.W. (1995). Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval. SIAM Review, 37(4), 573-595. doi 10.1137/1037127.
7. Caccamise, D., Franzke, M., Eckhoff, A., Kintsch, E. & Kintsch, W. (2007). Guided practice in technology-based summary writing. In D.S. McNamara & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 375-395). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Caccamise, D., Franzke, M., Eckhoff, A. & Kintsch, W. (2007). Automated tutor for teaching summarization and deep comprehension. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cromley, J.G. & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refning the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311-325. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311.
10. Cross, D.R. & Paris, S.G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 31-41. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.131.
11. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. & van de Ven, A. (2001). Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: A design experiment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 531-559. doi: 10.1348/000709901158668.
12. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K. & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391-407. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391:AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9.
13. Dilling, H., Mombour, W. & Schmidt, M.H. (2000). Internationale Klassifkation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10 Kapitel V (F) [Intenational classifcation of mental diseases: ICD-10 chapter V(F)]. Bern: Huber.
14. Duffy, G.D., Roehler, L.R. & Herrmann, B.A. (1988). Modeling mental processes helps poor readers become strategic readers. Reading Teacher, 4, 762-767.
15. Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Johnson, N. & Dooley, S. (2005). Summary Street: Computer support for comprehension and writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 53-80.
16. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G. & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206. doi: 10.3102/00028312034001174.
17. Gajria, M., Jitendra, A.K., Sood, S. & Gabriell, S. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210-225.
18. Gold, A., Mokhlesgerami, J., Rühl, K., Schreblowski, S. & Souvignier, E. (2004). Wir werden Textdetektive - Lehrermanual & Arbeitsheft [Let us become Text Detectives: Teacher manual and workbook]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
19. Gold, A., Trenk-Hinterberger, I. & Souvignier, E. (2009). Die Textdetektive. Ein strategieorientiertes Programm zur Förderung des Leseverständnisses [The Text Detectives: A strategy oriented programme for fostering reading comprehension]. In W. Lenhard & W. Schneider (Eds.), Diagnose und Förderung des Leseverständnisses [Diagnosis and promotion of reading comprehension] (pp. 207-226). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
20. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfeld, A. & Perencevich, K.C. (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hasselhorn, M. (1992). Metakognition und Lernen [Meta-cognition and learning]. In G. Nold (Ed.), Lernbedin-gungen und Lernstrategien: Welche Rolle spielen kognitive Verstehensstrukturen? [Learning conditions and learning strategies: The role of cognitive comprehension structures] (pp. 35-65). Tübingen: Narr.
22. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
23. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
24. Heller, K.A. & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4.-12 [Cognitive profciency test for Grades 4 to 12+]. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4-12+ R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
25. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., Woodruff, A., Reutebuch, C. & Kouzekanani, K. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 235-249. doi: 10.1177/07419325060270040401.
26. Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Franzke, M., Johnson, N. & Dooley, S. (2007). SummaryStreet®: Computer-guided summary writing. In T.K. Landauer, D.S. McNamara, S. Dennis & W. Kintsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis (pp. 263-278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., LSA Research Group, Matthews, C. & Lamb, R. (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 87-109. doi: 10.1076/1049-4820(200008)8:2;1-B;FT087.
28. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Klauer, K.J. (2010). Schädliche Inferenzen beim Training hochkomplexer Lernstrategien? [Harmful inferences induced by the training of complex learning strategies] Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 24, 235-239. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000019.
30. Landauer, T.K., McNamara, D., Dennis, S. & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Lenhard, W. (2008). Bridging the gap to natural language: Latent semantic analysis as a tool for the development of intelligent tutoring systems. Research Report, University of Würzburg.
32. Lenhard, W. (2009). Interventionskonzepte zur Förderung von Lesekompetenz [Interventional concepts for the promotion of reading competence]. In A. Bertschi-Kaufmann & C. Rosebrock (Eds.), Literalität: Bildungsaufgabe und Forschungsfeld [Literacy: Educational task and research topic] (pp. 257-268). Weinheim: Juventa.
33. Lingel, K., Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C. & Schneider, W. (2010). Metakognitives Wissen in der Sekundarstufe: Konstruktion und Evaluation domänenspezifscher Messverfahren [Meta-cognitive knowledge in secondary education: Construction and evaluation of domain-specifc assessment]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 56, 228-238.
34. Martin, D. & Berry, M. (2007). Mathematical foundations behind latent semantic analysis. In T.K. Landauer, D.S. McNamara, S. Dennis & W. Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 35-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. McKeown, M.G., Beck, I.L. & Blake, R.G.K. (2009). Rethinking comprehension instruction: Comparing strategies and content instructional approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218-253.
36. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientifc research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/smallbook_pdf.pdf
37. Palincsar, A.S. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.
38. Paris, S.G., Cross, D.R. & Lipson, M.Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239.
39. Paris, S.G. & Jacobs, J. (1984). The benefts of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083-2093.
40. Paris, S.G., Wasik, B.A. & Turner, J.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
41. Prenzel, M., Zimmer, K., Drechsel, B., Heidemeier, H. & Draxler, C. (2005). Der Blick in die Länder [A view on Federal German states]. In M. Prenzel, J. Baumert, W. Blum, R. Lehmann, D. Leutner, M. Neubrand, R. Pekrun, J. Rost & U. Schiefele (Eds.), PISA 2003. Der zweite Vergleich der Länder in Deutschland - Was wissen und können Jugendliche [The second comparison of Federal German states: The knowledge and abilities of teenagers] (pp. 169-233). Münster: Waxmann.
42. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosen-thal, P.D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II1, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11-27). New York: Guilford.
44. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G. & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857-867.
45. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P.B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J.L., Almasi, J. et al. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 513-555. doi: 10.1086/461705.
46. Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D.L., Elliott-Faust, D. & Miller, R. (1985). Children's use of cognitive strategies: How to teach strategies and what to do if they can't be taught. In M. Pressley & J.C. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 1-47). New York: Springer.
47. RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
48. Rühl, K. & Souvignier, E. (2006). Wir werden Lesedetektive - Lehrermanual & Arbeitsheft [Let us become Reading Detectives: Teacher manual and workbook]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
49. Schneider, W. & Sodian, B. (1997). Memory strategy development: Evidence from longitudinal studies. Developmental Review, 17, 442-461. doi:10.1006/drev.1997.0441.
50. Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189. doi: 10.3102/0034654307313795.
51. Souvignier, E. (2009). Effektivität von Interventionen zur Verbesserung des Leseverständnisses [Effectivity of interventions for fostering reading comprehension]. In W. Lenhard & W. Schneider (Eds.), Diagnose und Förderung des Leseverständnisses [Diagnosis and promotion of reading comprehension] (pp. 185-206). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
52. Souvignier, E., Trenk-Hinterberger, I., Adam-Schwebe, S. & Gold, A. (2008). Frankfurter Leseverständnistest FLVT 5-6 [Frankfurt reading comprehension test for Grades 5 and 6]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
53. Streblow, L., Holodynski, M. & Schiefele, U. (2007). Entwicklung eines Lesekompetenztrainings (LEKOLEMO) für die siebte Klassenstufe: Bericht über zwei Evaluationsstudien [Development of a reading competence training (LEKOLEMO) for the 7th grade]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 54, 287-297.
54. Suggate, S.P. (2010). Why 'what' we teach depends on 'when': Age as a moderator of reading intervention. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1556-1579. doi:10.1037/a0020612.
55. Torgesen, J. (2002). The prevention of reading diffculties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7-26. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00092-9.
56. Van Kraayenoord, C.E. (2010). The role of metacognition in reading comprehension. In H.P. Trolldenier, W. Lenhard & P. Marx (Eds.), Brennpunkte der Gedächntisforschung (pp. 277-304). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
57. Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S. & Ciullo, S. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889-912. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5.