Strong ground motion attributes of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile, earthquake

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 28, Issue SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages

  Boroschek, Rubén L ^a   Contreras, Víctor ^a   Kwak, Dong Youp ^b   Stewart, Jonathan P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOW PASS FILTERS; SOILS;

DISTANCE RANGES; FREQUENCY RANGES; GROUND MOTIONS; RESPONSE SPECTRA; RUPTURE DIRECTIVITY; SITE CONDITIONS; STRONG GROUND MOTION; STRONG MOTION;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

CHILE EARTHQUAKE 2010; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT PLANE; ROCK; SOFT SOIL; STRONG MOTION;

CHILE; MAULE;

EID: 84876051820     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.4000045     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., and Youngs, R. R., 1992. A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 505-510.
2. Akkar, S., and Boore, D. M., 2009. On baseline corrections and uncertainty in response spectra for baseline variations commonly encountered in digital accelerograph records, Bul. Seism. Soc. Am. 99, 1671-1690.
3. Akkar, S., Kale, Ö., Yenier, E., and Bommer, J. J., 2011. The high-frequency limit of usable response spectral ordinates from filtered analogue and digital strong-motion accelerograms, Eqk. Engrg Struct. Dyn. 40, 1387-1401.
4. Akkar, S., and Bommer, J. J., 2006. Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements, Eqk. Engrg. Struct. Dyn. 35, 1145-1165.
5. Álvarez, M., 2006.Factibilidad de utilización de técnicas geofísicas en estudios de fenómenos de remo-ción en masa, Caso: deslizamiento de San José de Maipo, Memoria para optar al título de geólogo, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile (in Spanish).
6. w 8.8) Maule Earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 28, this issue.
7. Astroza, M., Cabezas, F., Moroni, M., Massone, L., Ruiz, S., Parra, E., Cordero, F., and Mottadelli, A., 2010. Intensidades Sísmicas en el Area de Daños del Terremoto del 27 de Febrero de 2010, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile (in Spanish).
8. Arango, M. C., Strasser, F. O., Bommer, J. J., Boroschek, R., Comte, D., and Tavera, H., 2011. A strong-motion database from the Peru-Chile subduction zone, J. Seismology 15, 19-41.
9. Atkinson, G. M., and Boore, D. M., 2003. Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 1703-1729.
10. Atkinson, G. M., and Boore, D. M., 2008. Erratum to empirical ground-motion relations for sub-duction zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 98, 2567-2569.
11. Atkinson, G. M., and Cassidy, J. F., 2000. Integrated use of seismograph and strong-motion data to determine soil amplification: Response of the Fraser River Delta to the Duvall and Georgia Strait earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 1028-1040.
12. Boroschek, R. L., Yanez, F., Bejarano, I., Molnar, S., and Torres, A., 2012. Summary of the Geotechnical Characterization University of Chile Strong Motion Accelerograph Stations, University of Chile.
13. w=8.4 earthquake records, J. Seismol. 10, 353-369.
14. Boroschek, R. L., and Legrand, D., 2006. Tilt motion effects on the double time integration of linear accelerometers: an experimental approach, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 2072-2089.
15. Boroschek, R. L., Soto, P., and Leon, R., 2010. Maule Region Earthquake, 27 February 2010, Mw 8.8, Renadic Report 10/08 Revision 8.
16. Çelebi, M., 1987. Topographical and geological amplifications determinedfrom strong-motion and aftershock records of the 3 March 1985 Chile earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 1147-1167.
17. Çelebi, M., 1991. Topographical and geological amplification: case studies and engineering applications, Structural Safety 10, 199-217.
18. Chiou, B. S.-J., Darragh, R., Dregor, D., and Silva, W. J., 2008. NGA project strong-motion database, Earthquake Spectra 24, 23-44.
19. Converse, A. M., and Brady, A. G., 1992. BAP Basic Strong-Motion Accelerogram Processing Software, version 1.0, Open-File Report 92-296A, U.S. Geological Survey.
20. Daza, V., 2003. Interacción sísmica suelo-estructura en el puente Marga-Marga, Memoria para optar al título de ingeniero Civil, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile. Santiago, Chile (in Spanish).
21. w=8.8 Maule Earthquake, central Chile, from static and high-rate GPS, InSAR, and broadband teleseismic data, Geophy. Res. Ltrs 37, L17305, DOI 10.1029/2010GL043899.
22. Fritz, H. M., Petroff, C. M., Catala', P. A., Cienfuegos, R., Winckler, P., Kalligeris, N., Weiss, R., Barrientos, S. E., Meneses, G., Valderas-Bermejo, C., Ebeling, C., Papadopoulos, A., Contreras, M., Almar, R., Dominguez, J. C., and Synolakis, C. E., 2011. Field survey of the 27 February 2010 Chile tsunami, Pure Appl. Geophys. 168, 1989-2010.
23. th IASPEI/IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, 23-26 August 2011, University of California, Santa Barbara.
24. Kanamori, H., 1986. Rupture process of subduction zone earthquakes, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 14, 293-322.
25. Kempton, J. J., and Stewart, J. P., 2006. Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects, Earthquake Spectra 22, 985-1013.
26. Leyton, F., Sepúlveda, S. A., Astroza, M., Rebolledo, S., González, L., Ruiz, S., Foncea, C., Herrera, M., and Lavado, J., 2010. Zonificación Sísmica de la Cuenca de Santiago, Chile. Congreso Chileno de Sismología e Ingeniería Antisísmica, X Jornadas, 22-27 de Mayo de 2010, Valdivia, Santiago, Chile (in Spanish).
27. Nicolau del Roure, R., Gutiérrez, T. A., Woywood, Y. M., and Parra, Z. M., 1980. Caracter-ísticas de la Amplificación Sísmica en la Ciudad de Concepción, 3as. Jornadas Chilenas de Sismología e Ingeniería Antisísmica, C.4.1-C.4.18 (in Spanish).
28. Ortigosa, P., 2011. Personal communication, Technical Manager, PETRUS Consultores Geotéc-nicos, Santiago, Chile.
29. Paolucci, R., Rovelli, A., Faccioli, E., Cauzzi, C., Finazzi, D., Vanini, M., Di Alessandro, C., and Calderoni, G., 2008. On the reliability of long period spectral ordinates from digital accelerograms, Eqk. Engrg. Struct. Dyn. 37, 697-710.
30. Ramírez, P., and Vivallos, J., 2009. Microzonificación sísmica de la ciudad de Concepción, Chile, XII Congreso Geológico Chileno, 22-26 de Noviembre, Santiago, Chile (in Spanish).
31. Rathje, E. M., Faraj, F., Russell, S., and Bray, J. D., 2004. Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions, Earthquake Spectra 20, 119-144.
32. w 8.4 Southern Peru earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 26, 499-524.
33. w 8.8 Maule earthquake in Chile, Earthquake Spectra 28, this issue.
34. Ruz, M., 2011. Personal communication, Ruz & Vukasovic Ingenieros Asociados Ltda., Santiago, Chile.
35. Scasserra, G., Stewart, J. P., Bazzurro, P., Lanzo, G., and Mollaioli, F., 2009. A comparison of NGA ground motion prediction equations to Italian data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 99, 2961-2978.
36. Scherbaum, F., Cotton, F., and Smit, P., 2004. On the use of response spectral reference data for the selection and ranking of ground motion models for seismic hazard analysis in regions of moderate seismicity: The case of rock motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 2164-2185.
37. Servicio Nacional de Geologia y Mineria (SNGM), 2003. 1:1.000.000 geologic map of Chile, Servicio Nacional de Geologia y Mineria, Chile.
38. Siebert, E., Rebolledo, S., Verdugo, R., and Campos, J., 2005. Respuesta sísmica y caracteriza-ción geológico-geotécnica de sitios donde están instaladas estaciones sismológicas en Santiago, Congreso Chileno de Sismología e Ingeniería Antisísmica, IX Jornadas, 16-19 de Noviembre. Concepción, Chile (in Spanish).
39. Taiba, O., 2010.Personalcommunication, Technical Manager, PilotesTerratestS.A., Santiago, Chile.
40. Trifunac, M. D., and Todorovska, M. I., 2001. A note on the useable dynamic range of accel-erographs recording translation, Soil Dyn. Eqk. Engrg. 21, 275-286.
41. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2010. M8.8 Maule, Chile, Earthquake of 27 February 2010, poster accessible at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/pager.
42. Vanmarcke, E., 1976. Structural response to earthquakes, Chapter 8 in Seismic Risk and Engineering Decisions (C. Lomnitz and E. Rosemblueth eds.), Elsevier Science Ltd., New York, 436 pp.
43. Watson-Lamprey, J., and Boore, D. M., 2007. Beyond SaGMRotI: Conversion to SaArb, SaSN, and SaMaxRot, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 97, 1511-1524.
44. Zhao, J., 2011. Personal communication.
45. Zhao, J. X., Zhang, J., Asano, A., Ohno, Y., Oouchi, T., Takahashi, T., Ogawa, H., Irikura, K., Thio, H. K., Somerville, P. G., and Fukushima, Y., 2006. Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 898-913.