Tilt motion effects on the double-time integration of linear accelerometers: An experimental approach

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2072-2089

  Boroschek, Rubén L ^a   Legrand, Denis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETERS; INTEGRATION; MECHANICAL TESTING; RESEARCH;

DIFFERENT INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES; SHAKE TABLE;

SEISMOLOGY;

ACCELEROMETER; DISPLACEMENT; GROUND MOTION; INSTRUMENTATION; MAGNITUDE; SHAKING TABLE TEST; TILT;

EID: 33846098620     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120050167     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boore, D. (2001). Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 91, 1199-1211.
2. Boore, D. (2003). Analog-to-digital conversion as a source of drifts in displacements derived from digital recordings of ground acceleration, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, no. 5, 2017-2024.
3. Boroschek, R., and S. Mahin (1991). Investigation of the seismic response of a lightly damped torsionally coupled building. University of California Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, EERC 91/18.
4. Boroschek, R., M. Moroni, and M. Sarrazin (2003). Dynamic properties of a long-span seismic isolated bridge, Eng. Struct. 25, no. 12, 1479-1490.
5. Bouchon, M., and K. Aki (1982). Strain, tilt, and rotation associated with strong ground motion in the vicinity of earthquake faults, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 1717-1738.
6. Graizer, V. M. (1979). Determination of the true ground displacement by using strong-motion records, Izvestiya Academy of Sciences, USSR, Physics of the Solid Earth 15, no. 12, 875-885.
7. Graizer, V. M. (1989). On inertial seismometry, Izvestiya Academy of Sciences, USSR, Physics of the Solid Earth 25, 26-29.
8. Graizer, V. M. (2005). Effect of tilt on strong motion data processing, Soil Dyn. Earth Eng. 25, 197-204.
9. Hudson, D. (1979). Reading and Interpreting Strong Motion Accelerograms, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California.
10. Igel, H., U. Schreiber, A. Flaws, B. Schuberth, A. Velikoseltsev, and A. Cochard (2005). Rotational motions induced by the M8.1 Tokachioki earthquake, September 25, 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L08309, doi: 10.1029/2004GL022336.
11. Niazi, M. (1986). Inferred displacements, velocities and rotations of a long rigid foundation located at El Centro differential array site during the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 14, 531-542.
12. Nigbor, R. (1994). Six-degree-of-freedom ground-motion measurement, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 1665-1669.
13. Rodgers, P. (1968). The response of the horizontal pendulum seismometer to Rayleigh and Love waves, tilt and free oscillation of the Earth, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 58, 1384-1406.
14. Rodgers, P. (1969). A note on the response of the pendulum seismometer to plane wave rotation, Bull. Seism Soc. Am. 59, 2101-2102.
15. Shakal, A., M. Huang, and V. Graizer (2003). Strong-motion data processing, In International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, W. Lee, H. Kanamori, P. Jennings, and C. Kisslinger (Editors), Academic Press, Amsterdam.
16. Takeo, M. (1998). Ground rotational motions recorded in near-source region of earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, no. 6, 789-792.
17. Takeo, M., and H. Ito (1997). What can be learned from rotational motions excited by earthquakes? Geophys. J. Int. 129, 319-329.
18. Teisseyre, R., J. Suchcicki, K. Teisseyre, J. Wiszniowski, and P. Palangio (2003a). Seismic rotation waves: basic elements of theory and recording, Ann. Geophys. 46, 671-685.
19. Teisseyre, R., K. Teisseyre, T. Moriya, and P. Palangio (2003b). Seismic rotation waves related to volcanic, mining and seismic events: near-field and micromorphic motions, Acta Geophys. Pol. 51, 409-431.
20. Todorovska, M. I. (1998). Cross-axis sensitivity of accelerographs with pendulum like transducers mathematical model and the inverse problem, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27, no. 10, 1031-1051.
21. Todorovska, M. I., E. I. Novikova, M. D. Trifunac, and S. S. Ivanovic (1995). Correction for misalignment and cross axis sensitivity of strong earthquake motion recorded by SMA-1 accelerographs, Report No. 95-06, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
22. Trifunac, M. (1982). A note on rotational components of earthquake motions on ground surface for incident body waves, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 1, no. 1, 11-19.
23. Trifunac, M., and V. Lee (1973). Routine computer processing of strong motion accelerograms, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, Report EERL 73-03, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
24. Trifunac, M., and M. Todorovska, (2001). A note on the usable dynamic range of accelerographs recording translation, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 21, 275-286.
25. Wang, G. Q., D. Boore, H. Igel, and X.-Y. Zhou (2003). Some observations on colocated and closely spaced strong ground-motion records of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seism Soc. Am. 93, no. 2, 674-693.
26. Wielandt, E., and Th. Forbriger (1999). Near-field seismic displacement and tilt associated with the explosive activity of Stromboli, Ann. Geofis. 42, no. 3, 407-416.
27. Zhu, L. (2003). Recovering permanent displacements from seismic records of the June 9, 1994 Bolivian deep earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, doi 10.1029/2003GLO17302.