Engineering analysis of ground motion records from the 2001 Mw 8.4 southern peru earthquake

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 499-524

  Rodriguez Marek, Adrian ^a   Bay, James A ^b   Park, Kwangsoo ^c,d   Montalva, Gonzalo A ^a,e   Cortez Flores, Adel ^f,g   Wartman, Joseph ^h   Boroschek, Rubén ⁱ  

^a Washington State University   (United States)

^b Utah State University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d University Station C1792 ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^f Consultora Union SRL ^*  (Bolivia)

^g WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; MOTION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR WAVES; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; SURFACE WAVES; WAVE PROPAGATION;

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE; PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION; SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY; SPECTRAL ACCELERATION; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES; STRONG MOTION DATUM; STRONG MOTION RECORDS;

FAULTING;

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; FAULT ZONE; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS;

CHILE; PERU;

EID: 77958468836     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.3381172     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aguilar Bardales, Z., and Piedra Rubio, R., 2001. Data Acquisition System Implementation for the CISMID-FIC Network of Accelerographs, Research Report, Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria-CISMID, Peru (in Spanish).
2. Arias, A., 1970. A measure of earthquake intensity, in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, R. J. Hansen, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 512 pp.
3. Atkinson, G. M., and Boore, D. M., 2003. Empirical ground-motion relations for subductionzone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1703-1729.
4. Borcherdt, R. D., 2002. Empirical evidence for site coefficients in building code provisions, Earthquake Spectra 18(2), 189-217.
5. w=8.4 earthquake records, J. Seismol. 10, 353-369.
6. Boroschek, R., Soto, P., and Leon, R., 2001. Records in northern Chile: June 23rd, 2001 Southern Peru earthquake, Informe RENADIC 01/04, University of Chile (in Spanish).
7. Chen, R-F., Bina, C. R., and Okal, E. A., 2001. Variations in slab dip along the subducting Nazca Plate, as related to stress patterns and moment release of intermediate-depth seismicity and to surface volcanism, Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst. 2, 1054.
8. Cortez-Flores, A., 2004. Site Response of the 2001 Southern Peru Earthquake, M.S. thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
9. Darendeli, B. M., 2001. Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction and Material Damping Curves, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, TX.
10. Dewey, J. W., Silva, W J., and Tavera, H., 2003. Seismicity and tectonics, Earthquake Spectra 19, 1-10.
11. Dorbath, L., Cisternas, A., and Dorbath, C., 1990. Assessment of the size of large and great historical earthquakes in Peru, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 80(3), 551-576.
12. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1993. Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions. Volume 1: Method and guidelines for estimating earthquake ground motion in eastern North America, Report No. EPRI TR-102293, Palo Alto, CA.
13. Giovanni, M., Beck, S. L., and Wagner, L., 2002. The June 23, 2001 Peru earthquake and the Southern Peru subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 2018.
14. Harvard Centroid Moment Tensor Catalog (CMT), 2008. Global Centroid Moment Tensor Catalog, http://www.globalcmt.org/ (Last accessed December 31, 2008).
15. Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil (INDECI), 2005. Compendio Estadístico de Prevención y Atención de Desastres 2005, Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil, Lima, Perú (in Spanish). International Code Council (ICC), 2006. 2006 International Building Code, ICC, Washington, D.C.
16. Joh, S.-H., 1996. Advances in the Data Interpretation Technique for Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Waves (SASW) Measurements, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
17. Kempton, J. J., and Stewart, J. P., 2006. Prediction equations for significant duration of earth-quake ground motions considering site and near-source effects, Earthquake Spectra 11, 985-1013.
18. w 8.2) on June 23, 2001, EIC seismological note: 105 (http://wwweic.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/EIC/EIC News/105E.html).
19. Kosaka-Masuno, R., Arias-Barahona, H. P., Farfán-Bazán, E., Gonzáles-Zenteno, E., MinayaLizárraga, A., and Ticona-Paucara, J., 2001. Evaluación de Peligros de la Ciudad de Moquegua, Universidad Nacional de San Augustin de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru.
20. Kramer, S. L., 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, 653 pp.
21. Lermo, J., and Chavez-Garcia, F., 1993. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83, 1574-1594.
22. Marosi, K. T., and Hiltunen, D. R., 2004. Characterization of Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves Shear Wave velocity measurement uncertainty, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130, 1034-1041.
23. McVerry, G. H., Zhao, J. X., Abrahamson, N. A., and Somerville, P. G., 2006. New Zealand acceleration response spectrum attenuation relations for crustal and subduction zone earthquakes, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 39, 1-58.
24. Moss, R. E. S., 2008. Quantifying Measurement Uncertainty of Thirty-Meter Shear-Wave Velocity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1399-1411.
25. Nakamura, T., 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface, QR RTR1 30, 1, February.
26. Park, K., 2004. Shear wave velocity profiling at sites affected by the 2001 Southern Peru earthquake, Masters thesis, Utah State University, Logan.
27. Rathje, E. M., Faraj, F., Russell, S., and Bray, J. D., 2004. Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions, Earthquake Spectra 20, 119-144.
28. Rodriguez-Marek, A., and Edwards, C., 2003. Southern Peru Earthquake of 23 June 2001 Reconnaissance Report, Earthquake Spectra, published as a supplement of Vol. 19.
29. Rodriguez-Marek, A., Bray, J. D., and Abrahamson, N. A., 2001. An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure, Earthquake Spectra 17, 65-87.
30. Rodriguez, V. H. S., and Midorikawa, S., 2003. Comparison of spectral ratio techniques for estimation of site effects using microtremor data and earthquake motions recorded at the surface and in boreholes, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 1691-1714.
31. Ruiz, S., and Saragoni, G. R., 2005. Fórmulas de atenuación para la subducción de Chile de terremotos interplaca tipo thrust considerando los efectos del suelo y las asperezas, in Proceedings, IX Jornadas Chilenas de Sismología e Ingeniería Antisísmica, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile in Spanish).
32. Sato, H., and Konagai, K., 2002. Seismicity, strong ground motions, and geology, The June 23, 2001 Atico Earthquake, Peru, K. Konakai, ed., Japanese Society of Civil Engineers (http://www.jsce-int.org/rep-disaster.html).
33. Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H. B., 1972. SHAKE, A Computer Program for Earthquake Analysis of Horizontally Layered Soils, Report EERC 72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
34. SESAME, E., 2004. Report on Parameter Studies, Deliverable D12.09.
35. Shakal, A. F., Huang, M., and Graizer, V., 2004. CSMIP strong-motion data processing, presented at Invited Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing, 26-27 May 2004, Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS), Richmond, CA.
36. Silva, W., Rodriguez-Marek, A., and Wartman, J., 2007. Development of synthetic ground motions for the June 23rd 2001 Southern Peru Earthquake, in 13th PanAmerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Isla Margarita, Venezuela, 224-229.
37. Silva, W. J., Abrahamson, N. A., Toro, G., and Costantino, C., 1997. Description and Validation of the Stochastic Ground Motion Model, unpublished report prepared for Brookhaven National laboratory, Associated Universities, Inc.
38. Silva, W. J., Darragh, R., Stark, C., Wong, I., Stepp, J., Schneider, J., and Chiou, S., 1990. A methodology to estimate design response spectra in the near-source region of large earthquakes using the Band-Limited-White-Noise ground motion model, in Proc. Fourth U.S. Nat. Conf Earth. Engin. 1, 487-494.
39. Stokoe, K. H., Wright, S. G., Bay, J. A., and Rosset, J. M., 1994. Characterization of Geotechnical Sites by SASW Method, ISSMFE Technical Committee 10, Oxford Publishers, New Delhi, India.
40. Tavera, H., Fernández, E., Bernai, I., Antayhua, Y., Agüero, C., Rodriguez, H. S. S., Vilcapoma, L., Zamudio, Y., Portugal, D., Inza, A., Carpio, J., Ccallo, F., and Valdivia, I., 2006. The southern region of Peru earthquake of June 23rd, 2001, J. Seismol. 10, 171-195.
41. Travasarou, T., Bray, J. D., and Abrahamson, N. A., 2003. Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 1133-1155.
42. USGS 2008. USGS Earthquake Hazards Program: Earthquake Report: Near Coast of Peru, at http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq-depot/2001/eq-010623/ (last accessed 31 December 2008).
43. Vallée, M., 2004. Stabilizing the empirical Green function analysis: development of the Projected Landweber method, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 394-409.
44. Youngs, R. R., Silva, W J., and Humphrey, J. R., 1997. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 58-73.
45. Zhao, J. X., Irikura, K., Zhang, J., Fukushima, Y., Somerville, P. G., Asano, A., Ohno, Y., Oouchi, T., Takahashi, T., and Ogawa, H., 2006a. An empirical site-classification method for strong-motion stations in Japan using H/V response spectral ratio, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, 914-925.
46. Zhao, J. X., Zhang, J., Asano, A., Ohno, Y., Oouchi, T., Takahashi, T., Ogawa, H., Irikura, K., Thio, H. K., Somerville, P. G., Fukushima, Y., and Fukushima, Y., 2006b. Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, 898-913.