Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 115, Issue 2 PART 1, 2010, Pages 338-343

  Jastrow, Nicole ^b   Roberge, Stéphanie ^b   Gauthier, Robert J ^b   Laroche, Liny ^b   Duperron, Louise ^b   Brassard, Normand ^b   Bujold, Emmanuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABOR COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINEUM INJURY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; DELIVERY; DYSTOCIA; INJURY; MACROSOMIA; NEWBORN; PERINEUM; PREGNANCY; TRIAL OF LABOR;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PERINEUM; PREGNANCY; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 76549095551     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c915da     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56(6):1-103.
2. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian perinatal health report. 2008 ed. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2008.
3. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335:689-95.
4. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351: 2581-9.
5. Paré E, Quiñ ones JN, Macones GA. Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG 2006;113:75-85.
6. Kennare R, Tucker G, Heard A, Chan A. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:270-6.
7. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Fetal mac-rosomia. ACOG Practice Bulletin 22. Washington, DC: ACOG 2000.
8. Hamilton EF, Bujold E, McNamara H, Gauthier R, Platt RW. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:620-4.
9. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:332-7.
10. Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1326-30.
11. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1016-23.
12. Hendler I, Bujold E. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104: 273-7.
13. Flamm BL, Goings JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication? Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:694-7.
14. Phelan JP, Eglinton GS, Horenstein JM, Clark SL, Yeh S. Previous cesarean birth: trial of labor in women with macro-somic infants. J Reprod Med 1984;29:36-40.
15. Nguyen TV, Dinh TV, Suresh MS, Kinch RA, Anderson GD. Vaginal birth after cesarean section at the University of Texas. J Reprod Med 1992;37:880-2.
16. Aboulfalah A, Abbassi H, El Karroumi M, Morsad F, Samouh N, Matar N, et al. Delivery of large baby after cesarean section: role of trial of labor: a propos of 355 cases [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2000;29:409-13.
17. Algert CS, Morris JM, Simpson JM, Ford JB, Roberts CL. Labor before a primary cesarean delivery: reduced risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1061-6.
18. Macones GA, Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo A, Peipert J, Stevens EJ. Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1148-52.
19. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:824-30.
20. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:903-5.
21. Tahilramaney MP, Boucher M, Eglinton GS, Beall M, Phelan JP. Previous cesarean section and trial of labor: factors related to uterine dehiscence. J Reprod Med 1984;29:17-21.
22. Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 342. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108: 465-8.
23. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines No. 155. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;89:319-31.
24. Simon NV, LeviskyJS, Shearer DM, O'Lear MS, Flood JT. Influence of fetal growth patterns on sonographic estimation of fetal weight. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15:376-83.
25. Deter RL, Hadlock FP. Use of ultrasound in the detection of macrosomia: a review. J Clin Ultrasound 1985;13:519-24.
26. Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FD Jr. Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:1118-21.
27. Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, Chauhan VB, Chang G, Magann EF, et al. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 2005;193: 332-46.
28. Matsumoto M, Yanagihara T, Hata T. Three-dimensional qualitative sonographic evaluation of fetal soft tissue. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2438-42.
29. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 1996;347:281-4.
30. Bujold E, Jastrow, N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier RJ. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:320.e1-6.