Arguments from experience: The PADUA protocol

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 405-416

  Wardeh, Maya ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a   Coenen, Frans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Classification; Dialogue Games

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

ARGUMENTATION; CASE-STUDIES; CASEBASED REASONINGS (CBR); DIALOGUE GAME; DIRECT USE; NOISY DATASETS;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 84875965870     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, A.N. Swami: Association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proc. of ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Washington, (1993), 207-216.
2. V. Aleven: Teaching Case Based Argumentation Through an Example and Models. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 1997
3. L. Amgoud, S. Belabbès, and H. Prade: A formal general setting for dialogue protocols. In: Proc. of AIMSA'06 12th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, Applications, Varna, Bulgaria, (2006), 13-15.
4. K. D. Ashley: Modeling Legal Argument. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990.
5. K. D. Ashley and S. Brüninghaus: A Predictive Role for Intermediate Legal Concepts. In: Bourcier D. (ed) Proceedings of Jurix 2003, IOS Press: Amsterdam (2003), 153-162.
6. T.J.M. Bench-Capon: Knowledge Based Systems Applied To Law: A Framework for Discussion. In: T.J.M. Bench-Capon (ed), Knowledge Based Systems and Legal Applications, Academic Press, (1991), 329-342.
7. F. P. Coenen, P. Leng and G. Goulbourne: Tree Structures for Mining Association Rules. In: Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol 8, No 1, (2004), 25-51.
8. A. Chorley, T. J. M. Bench-Capon: AGATHA: Using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13(1), (2005), 9-51.
9. G. Goulbourne, F. P. Coenen and P. Leng: Algorithms for Computing Association Rules Using A Partial-Support Tree. In: Proc. of ES99, Springer, London, UK, (1999), 132-147.
10. G. Governatori and A. Stranieri. Towards the Application of Association Rules for Defeasible Rules Discovery. In jurix, Amesterdam (2001). 63-75.
11. L. Lindahl and J. Odelstad: Normative positions within an algebraic approach to normative systems. In Journal of Applied Logic, 17 2, (2005).
12. J. Mackenzie: Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, (1979), 117-133.
13. P. McBurney and S. Parsons: Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents. In: Journal of logic, language and information, 11(3), (2002), 315-334.
14. M Minsky and S. Papert: Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, (1969).
15. S. Ontañón and E. Plaza. Arguments and Counterexamples in Case-Based Joint Deliberation. In ArgMAS Hakodate, Japan (2006). 36-53.
16. H. Prakken: On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In: Proc. of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence, no. 1919 in Springer Lecture Notes in AI, Berlin. Springer Verlag, (2000), 224-238.
17. H. Prakken: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. In: Journal of Logic and Computation 15 , (2005), 1009-1040.
18. H. Prakken: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. In: The Knowledge Engineering Review 21, (2006), 163-188.
19. D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany, NY, USA, (1995).
20. M. Wardeh, T. J. M. Bench-Capon and F. P. Coenen: PADUA Protocol: Strategies and Tactics. In Proc. ECSQARU , 9th European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasonong with Uncertainty, LNAI 4724, (2007), 465-476.