A formal general setting for dialogue protocols

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4183 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 13-23

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Belabbès, Sihem ^a   Prade, Henri ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Multi agent systems; Protocol

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROBABILITY;

ARGUMENTATION SYSTEM; DIALOGUE PROTOCOLS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750275272     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11861461_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1995.
2. C.L. Hamblin. Fallacies. Methuen, London, 1970.
3. J. MacKenzie. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8:117-133, 1979.
4. S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge, and L. Amgoud. On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. In Proc. AAMAS'03, pages 616-623, Melbourne, 2003.
5. H. Prakken. Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese, 127:187-219, 2001.
6. E. Alonso. A formal framework for the representation of negotiation protocols. Inteligencia Artificial, 3/97:30-49, 1997.
7. L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, and N. Maudet. Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In Proc. ECAI'00, pages 338-342, Berlin, 2000.
8. M. K. Chang and C. C. Woo. A speech-act-based negotiation protocol: design, implementation, and test use. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(4):360-382, 1994.
9. S. Kraus, K. Sycara, and A. Evenchik. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 104(1-2): 1-69, 1998.
10. S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261-292, 1998.
11. F. Sadri, F. Toni, and P. Torroni. An abductive logic programming architecture for negotiating agents. In Proc. JELIA'02, LNAI 2424, pages 419-431, Cosenza, 2002.
12. C. Sierra, N. R. Jennings, P. Noriega, and S. Parsons. A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In Proc. 4th Intl. Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL'97), pages 167-182, Providence, 1997.
13. M. Johnson, P. McBurney, and S. Parsons. When are two protocols the same? In Communication in Multiagent Systems: Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies, LNAI 2650, pages 253-268, 2003.
14. M. Johnson, P. McBurney, and S. Parsons. A mathematical model of dialog. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2005. In press.
15. H. Prakken. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15:1009-1040, 2005.
16. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
17. A. Rubinstein. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50:97-109, 1982.
18. R. G. Smith. The contract net protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 29(12):1104-1113, 1980.
19. S.S. Fatima, M. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings. An agenda based framework for multi-issues negotiation. Artificial Intelligence, 152(1):l-45, 2004.
20. A.R. Lomuscio, M. Wooldridge, and N.R. Jennings. A classification scheme for negotiation in electronic commerce, Intl. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(1):31-56, 2003.
21. J. van Veenen and H. Prakken. A protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation. In Proc. 2nd Intl Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMas-05), Utrecht, 2005.
22. P. McBurney, D. Hitchcock, and S. Parsons. The eight-fold way of deliberation dialogue. Intelligent Systems, 2005. In press.
23. H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk. Logics for defeasible argumentation. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, second edition, volume 4, pages 218-319. 2002.
24. J.S. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin. Rules of encounter: Designing conventions for automated negotiation among computers. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994.
25. T.W. Sandholm. Distributed rational decision making. In G. Wei, editor, Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 201-258. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999.
26. P. McBurney, S. Parsons, and M. Wooldridge. Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols. In Proc. AAMAS'02, pages 402-409, Bologna, 2002.