On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 1919, Issue , 2000, Pages 224-238

  Prakken, Henry ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SPEECH PROCESSING;

ARGUMENTATIVE DIALOGUES; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; FORMAL FRAMEWORK; KEY ELEMENTS; NONMONOTONIC LOGIC; PRECISE DEFINITION; SPEECH ACTS;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84943191446     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-40006-0_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. L.Amgoud, N.Maudet, and S.Parsons.Modelling dialogues using argumentation.In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, Boston, MA, 2000.
2. T.J.M.Bench-Capon, D.Lowes, and A.M.McEnery.Using Toulmin's argument schema to explain logic programs.Knowledge Based Systems, pages 177-183, 1991.
3. G.Brewka.Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus.Journal of Logic and Computation, 2000.To appear.
4. T.F.Gordon.The Pleadings Game.An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1995.
5. F.Grasso, A.Cawsey, and R.Jones.Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: A case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2000.To appear.
6. J.C.Hage, R.E.Leenes, and A.R.Lodder.Hard cases: A procedural approach.Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2:113-166, 1994.
7. R.P.Loui.Process and policy: resource-bounded non-demonstrative reasoning.Computational Intelligence, 14:1-38, 1998.
8. J.D.MacKenzie.Question-begging in non-cumulative systems.Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8:117-133, 1979.
9. N.Maudet and D.Moore.Dialogue games for computer-supported collaborative argumentation.In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation for Learning Communities, Stanford, 1999.
10. S.Parsons, C.Sierra, and N.R.Jennings.Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing.Journal of Logic and Computation, 8:261-292, 1998.
11. H.Prakken.Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation.Synthese, 2000.To appear in special issue on New Perspectives in Dialogical Logics.
12. H.Prakken and G.A.W.Vreeswijk.Logical systems for defeasible argumentation.In D.Gabbay, editor, Handbook of Philosophical Logic.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2000.Second edition, to appear.
13. G.A.W.Vreeswijk.The computational value of debate in defeasible reasoning.Argumentation, 9:305-341, 1995.
14. D.N.Walton and E.C.W.Krabbe.Commitment in Dialogue.Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1995.