Parallel psychometric and cognitive modeling analyses of the Penn Face Memory Test in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 225-245

  Thomas, Michael L ^a   Brown, Gregory G ^a,b   Gur, Ruben C ^c,d   Hansen, John A ^c,d   Nock, Matthew K ^e   Heeringa, Steven ^f   Ursano, Robert J ^g   Stein, Murray B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^g UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers; Cognitive modeling; Item response theory; Penn Face Memory Test; Psychometric modeling

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; COPING BEHAVIOR; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOLDIER;

ADOLESCENT; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MILITARY PERSONNEL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RESILIENCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84875881875     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: 1744411X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2012.762974     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Army STARRS. (2011). National Institute of Mental Health Strategic Plan. Army STARRS Home. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http://www. armystarrs.org
3. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47-89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4. Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Dekker.
5. Batchelder, W. H. (2010). Cognitive psychometrics: Using multinomial processing tree models as measurement tools. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in model-based approaches (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley
7. Brandt, M. (2007). Bridging the gap between measurement models and theories of human memory. Journal of Psychology, 215, 72-85
8. Brown, G. G., Turner, T., Mano, Q. R., Bolden, K., & Thomas, M. L. (2012). Experimental manipulation of working memory model parameters: An exercise in construct validity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. Cabeza, R., & Kingstone, A. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Cai, L. (2010). High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 75, 33-57
11. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmulti- method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105
12. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Chalmers, P. (2011). mirt:Multidimensional item response theory. Retrieved from http://personality-project.org/ r/psych.manual.pdf
14. Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289
15. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60
16. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163-191
17. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684
18. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302
19. Davachi, L., & Wagner, A. (2002). Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: Insights from relational and item-based learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 982-990
20. De Ayala, R. J. (1994). The influence of dimensionality on the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 155-170
21. De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). The California Verbal Learning Test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
23. Diana, R. A. Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 379-386
24. Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197
25. Embretson, S. E. (2010). Cognitive design systems: A structural modeling approach applied to developing a spatial ability test. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in model-based approaches (pp. 274-273).Washington, DC : American Psychological Association
26. Embretson, S. E., & Gorin, J. (2001). Improving construct validity with cognitive psychology principles. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 343-368
27. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
28. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC
29. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley
30. Gronlund, S. D., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1986). Retrieval strategies in recall of natural categories and categorized lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 550-561
31. Gur, R. C., Erwin, R. J., & Gur, R. E. (1992). Neurobehavioral probes for physiologic neuroimaging studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 409-414
32. Gur, R. C., Jaggi, J. L., Ragland, J. D., Resnick, S. M., Shtasel, D., Muenz, L., et al. (1993). Effects of memory processing on regional brain activation: Cerebral blood flow in normal subjects. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 72, 31-44
33. Gur, R. E., Jaggi, J. L., Shtasel, D. L., & Ragland, J. D. (1994). Cerebral blood flow in schizophrenia: Effects of memory processing on regional activation. Biological Psychiatry, 35, 3-15
34. Gur, R. C., Ragland, J. D., Moberg, P. J., Turner, T. H., Bilker, W. B., Kohler, C., et al. (2001). Computerized neurocognitive scanning: I. Methodology and validation in healthy people. Neuropsychopharmacology, 25, 766-776
35. Gur, R. C., Ragland, J. D.,Mozley, L. H.,Mozley, P. D., Smith, R., Alavi, A., et al. (1997). Lateralized changes in regional cerebral blood flow during performance of verbal and facial recognition tasks: Correlations with performance and effort. Brain and Cognition, 33, 388-414
36. Gur, R. C., Richard, J., Calkins, M. E., Chiavacci, R., Hansen, J. A., Bilker,W. B., . . . Gur, R. E. (2012). Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8-21. Neuropsychology, 26, 251-265
37. Gur, R. C., Richard, J., Hughett, P., Calkins, M. E., Macy, L., Bilker, W. B., . . . Gur, R. E. (2010). A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: Standardization and initial construct validation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187, 254-262
38. Haberman, S. J. (1974). The analysis of frequency data. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
39. Haynes, S. N., Smith, G. T., & Hunsley, J. D. (2011). Scientific foundations of clinical assessment. New York, NY: Routledge
40. Hoerger, M., Quirk, S. W., & Weed, N. C. (2011). Development and validation of the Delaying Gratification Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 23, 725-738
41. Ingham, J. (1970). Individual differences in signal detection. Acta Psychologica, 34, 39-50
42. Kelley, W., Miezin, F., McDermott, K., Buckner, R., Raichle, M., Cohen, N., . . . Petersen, S. E. (1998). Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding. Neuron, 20, 927-936
43. Kim, H., & Cabeza, R. (2007). Differential contributions of prefrontal, medial temporal, and sensoryperceptual regions to true and false memory formation. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2143-2150
44. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., Hannay, H. J., & Fischer, J. S. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
45. Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, Monograph Supplement, 3, 635-694
46. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
47. Magnusson, D. (1966). Test theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
48. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
49. McDonald, R. P. (2000). A basis for multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 99-114
50. Mellenbergh, G. J. (1996). Measurement precision in test score and item response models. Psychological Methods, 1, 293-299
51. Mickes, L., Wixted, J. T., & Wais, P. E. (2007). A direct test of the unequal-variance signal-detection model of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 858-865
52. Mulaik, S. A. (2010). Foundations of factor analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC
53. Muraki, E., & Carlson, J. E. (1995). Full-information factor analysis for polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement. Special Issue: Polytomous Item Response Theory, 19, 73-90
54. Onyper, S. V., Zhang, Y. X., & Howard, M. W. (2010). Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 139, 341-364
55. R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
56. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 207-262). New York, NY: Academic Press
57. Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York, NY: Springer
58. Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 25-46
59. Revelle W. (2011) Psych: Procedures for Personality And Psychological Research. Retrieved from http:// personality-project.org/r/psych.manual.pdf
60. Revelle, W. (2011). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Retrieved from http:// personality-project.org/r/psych.manual.pdf Samejima, F. (1997). The graded response model. InW. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85-100). New York, NY: Springer
61. Snodgrass, J., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory-Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50
62. Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 1-25
63. Thomas, M. L. (2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: A review. Assessment, 18, 291-307
64. Townsend, J. T., & Neufeld, R.W. J. (2010). Introduction to special issue on contributions of mathematical psychology to clinical science and assessment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 1-4
65. U.S. Army. (2010). Army health promotion, risk reduction, and suicide prevention: Report 2010 Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http://csf.army.mil/ downloads/HP-RR-SPReport2010.pdf
66. Wheeler, M., & Buckner, R. (2003). Functional dissociation among components of remembering: Control, perceived oldness, and content. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3869-3880
67. Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
68. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176
69. Wixted, J. T.,&Squire, L.R. (2011). The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 210-217
70. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517