Neuronal gap junctions: Making and breaking connections during development and injury

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 227-236

  Belousov, Andrei B ^a   Fontes, Joseph D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain trauma; Connexin 36; Development; Gap junctions; Glutamate excitotoxicity; Stroke

Indexed keywords

CONNEXIN 36; GLUTAMIC ACID;

BRAIN INJURY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; EXCITOTOXICITY; GAP JUNCTION; HUMAN; NERVE CELL LESION; NERVE CELL NECROSIS; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVIEW; SYNAPSE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN DISEASES; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONNEXINS; ELECTRICAL SYNAPSES; HUMANS;

EID: 84875868475     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: 1878108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.11.001     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Eugenin E.A., et al. The role of gap junction channels during physiologic and pathologic conditions of the human central nervous system. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012, 7:499-518.
2. Beyer E.C., Berthoud V.M. The family of connexin genes. Connexins: A Guide 2009, 3-26. Humana Press. A. Harris, D. Locke (Eds.).
3. Rash J.E., et al. Connexin composition in apposed gap junction hemiplaques revealed by matched double-replica freeze-fracture replica immunogold labeling. J. Membr. Biol. 2012, 245:333-344.
4. Giaume C., Theis M. Pharmacological and genetic approaches to study connexin-mediated channels in glial cells of the central nervous system. Brain Res. Rev. 2010, 63:160-176.
5. Belluardo N., et al. Expression of connexin36 in the adult and developing rat brain. Brain Res. 2000, 865:121-138.
6. Venance L., et al. Connexin expression in electrically coupled postnatal rat brain neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:10260-10265.
7. Saez J.C., et al. Cell membrane permeabilization via connexin hemichannels in living and dying cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316:2377-2389.
8. Schock S.C., et al. ATP release by way of connexin 36 hemichannels mediates ischemic tolerance in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 368:138-144.
9. Bargiotas P., et al. Pannexins in ischemia-induced neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:20772-20777.
10. MacVicar B.A., Thompson R.J. Non-junction functions of pannexin-1 channels. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33:93-102.
11. Thompson R.J., et al. Activation of pannexin-1 hemichannels augments aberrant bursting in the hippocampus. Science 2008, 322:1555-1559.
12. Sosinsky G.E., et al. Pannexin channels are not gap junction hemichannels. Channels 2011, 5:193-197.
13. Condorelli D.F., et al. Cloning of a new gap junction gene (Cx36) highly expressed in mammalian brain neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1998, 10:1202-1208.
14. Sohl G., et al. The murine gap junction gene connexin36 is highly expressed in mouse retina and regulated during brain development. FEBS Lett. 1998, 428:27-31.
15. Al-Ubaidi M.R., et al. Functional properties, developmental regulation, and chromosomal localization of murine connexin36, a gap-junctional protein expressed preferentially in retina and brain. J. Neurosci. Res. 2000, 59:813-826.
16. Srinivas M., et al. Functional properties of channels formed by the neuronal gap junction protein connexin36. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19:9848-9855.
17. Hamzei-Sichani F., et al. Gap junctions on hippocampal mossy fiber axons demonstrated by thin-section electron microscopy and freeze fracture replica immunogold labeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:12548-12553.
18. Flores C.E., et al. Trafficking of gap junction channels at a vertebrate electrical synapse in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E573-E582.
19. Li X., et al. Connexin45-containing neuronal gap junctions in rodent retina also contain connexin36 in both apposing hemiplaques, forming bihomotypic gap junctions, with scaffolding contributed by zonula occludens-1. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:9769-9789.
20. Frank M., et al. Neuronal connexin-36 can functionally replace connexin-45 in mouse retina but not in the developing heart. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:3605-3615.
21. Nagy J.I. Evidence for connexin36 localization at hippocampal mossy fiber terminals suggesting mixed chemical/electrical transmission by granule cells. Brain Res. 2012, 1487:107-122.
22. Hoge G.J., et al. The extent and strength of electrical coupling between inferior olivary neurons is heterogeneous. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105:1089-1101.
23. Hamzei-Sichani F., et al. Mixed electrical-chemical synapses in adult rat hippocampus are primarily glutamatergic and coupled by connexin-36. Front. Neuroanat. 2012, 6:13.
24. Puller C., et al. ZO-1 and the spatial organization of gap junctions and glutamate receptors in the outer plexiform layer of the mammalian retina. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:6266-6275.
25. Li X., et al. The effector and scaffolding proteins AF6 and MUPP1 interact with connexin36 and localize at gap junctions that form electrical synapses in rodent brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 35:166-181.
26. Ciolofan C., et al. Association of connexin36 and zonula occludens-1 with zonula occludens-2 and the transcription factor zonula occludens-1-associated nucleic acid-binding protein at neuronal gap junctions in rodent retina. Neuroscience 2006, 140:433-451.
27. Li X., et al. Direct association of connexin36 with zonula occludens-2 and zonula occludens-3. Neurochem. Int. 2009, 54:393-402.
28. Helbig I., et al. In vivo evidence for the involvement of the carboxy terminal domain in assembling connexin 36 at the electrical synapse. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2010, 45:47-58.
29. 2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II at mixed synapses on the Mauthner cell: colocalization and association with connexin 35. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:9488-9499.
30. Alev C., et al. The neuronal connexin36 interacts with and is phosphorylated by CaMKII in a way similar to CaMKII interaction with glutamate receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:20964-20969.
31. Zlomuzica A., et al. Behavioral alterations and changes in Ca/calmodulin kinase II levels in the striatum of connexin36 deficient mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 226:293-300.
32. Kothmann W.W., et al. Connexin 35/36 is phosphorylated at regulatory sites in the retina. Vis. Neurosci. 2007, 24:363-375.
33. Patel L.S., et al. Regulation of gap junction coupling through the neuronal connexin Cx35 by nitric oxide and cGMP. Cell Commun. Adhes. 2006, 13:41-54.
34. Urschel S., et al. Protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of connexin36 in mouse retina results in decreased gap junctional communication between AII amacrine cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:33163-33171.
35. Kothmann W.W., et al. Dopamine-stimulated dephosphorylation of connexin 36 mediates AII amacrine cell uncoupling. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:14903-14911.
36. Herve J.C., et al. Gap junctional channels are parts of multiprotein complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818:1844-1865.
37. Arumugam H., et al. NMDA receptors regulate developmental gap junction uncoupling via CREB signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1720-1726.
38. Park W-M., et al. Interplay of chemical neurotransmitters regulates developmental increase in electrical synapses. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:5909-5920.
39. Mentis G.Z., et al. Increased incidence of gap junctional coupling between spinal motoneurones following transient blockade of NMDA receptors in neonatal rats. J. Physiol. 2002, 544:757-764.
40. Pastor A.M., et al. Increased electrotonic coupling in spinal motoneurons after transient botulinum neurotoxin paralysis in the neonatal rat. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 89:793-805.
41. Connors B.W., et al. Coupling between neurons of the developing rat neocortex. J. Neurosci. 1983, 3:773-782.
42. Meyer A.H., et al. In vivo labeling of parvalbumin-positive interneurons and analysis of electrical coupling in identified neurons. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:7055-7064.
43. Strata F., et al. A pacemaker current in dye-coupled hilar interneurons contributes to the generation of giant GABAergic potentials in developing hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:1435-1446.
44. Venance L., et al. Electrical and chemical transmission between striatal GABAergic output neurones in rat brain slices. J. Physiol. 2004, 559:215-230.
45. Lee S.C., et al. Electrical and chemical synapses between relay neurons in developing thalamus. J. Physiol. 2010, 588:2403-2415.
46. Mazza E., et al. Anatomical and electrotonic coupling in developing genioglossal motoneurons of the rat. Brain Res. 1992, 598:127-137.
47. Alvarez-Maubecin V., et al. Functional coupling between neurons and glia. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:4091-4098.
48. Personius K.E., et al. Reduced gap junctional coupling leads to uncorrelated motor neuron firing and precocious neuromuscular synapse elimination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:11808-11813.
49. Yu Y.C., et al. Preferential electrical coupling regulates neocortical lineage-dependent microcircuit assembly. Nature 2012, 486:113-117.
50. Connors B.W. Electrical signaling with neuronal gap junctions. Connexins: A Guide 2009, 143-164. Humana Press. A. Harris, D. Locke (Eds.).
51. Hestrin S., Galarreta M. Electrical synapses define networks of neocortical GABAergic neurons. Trends Neurosci. 2005, 28:304-309.
52. Parker P.R., et al. Stability of electrical coupling despite massive developmental changes of intrinsic neuronal physiology. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:9761-9770.
53. Curti S., et al. Synergy between electrical coupling and membrane properties promotes strong synchronization of neurons of the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:4341-4359.
54. de Pina-Benabou M.H., et al. Blockade of gap junctions in vivo provides neuroprotection after perinatal global ischemia. Stroke 2005, 36:2232-2237.
55. Oguro K., et al. Global ischemia-induced increases in the gap junctional proteins connexin 32 (Cx32) and Cx36 in hippocampus and enhanced vulnerability of Cx32 knock-out mice. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:7534-7542.
56. Wang Y., et al. Neuronal gap junction coupling is regulated by glutamate and plays critical role in cell death during neuronal injury. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:713-725.
57. Chang Q., et al. Nerve injury induces gap junctional coupling among axotomized adult motor neurons. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:674-684.
58. Frantseva M.V., et al. Specific gap junctions enhance the neuronal vulnerability to brain traumatic injury. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:644-653.
59. Ohsumi A., et al. Alteration of gap junction proteins (connexins) following lateral fluid percussion injury in rats. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2006, 96:148-150.
60. Striedinger K., et al. Loss of connexin36 increases retinal cell vulnerability to secondary cell loss. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 22:605-616.
61. Gajda Z., et al. Involvement of gap junctions in the manifestation and control of the duration of seizures in rats in vivo. Epilepsia 2003, 44:1596-1600.
62. Perez Velazquez J.L., et al. Modulation of gap junctional mechanisms during calcium-free induced field burst activity: a possible role for electrotonic coupling in epileptogenesis. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14:4308-4317.
63. Garrett F.G., Durham P.L. Differential expression of connexins in trigeminal ganglion neurons and satellite glial cells in response to chronic or acute joint inflammation. Neuron Glia Biol. 2008, 4:295-306.
64. Ben-Ari Y. Developing networks play a similar melody. Trends Neurosci. 2001, 24:353-360.
65. Song J-H., et al. Regulation of connexin 36 expression during development. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 513:17-19.
66. Kandler K., Katz L.C. Relationship between dye coupling and spontaneous activity in developing ferret visual cortex. Dev. Neurosci. 1998, 20:59-64.
67. Roerig B., Feller M.B. Neurotransmitters and gap junctions in developing neural circuits. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 2000, 32:86-114.
68. Zsiros V., Maccaferri G. Noradrenergic modulation of electrical coupling in GABAergic networks of the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:1804-1815.
69. O'Donnell P., Grace A.A. Cortical afferents modulate striatal gap junction permeability via nitric oxide. Neuroscience 1997, 76:1-5.
70. Yang Q.Z., Hatton G.I. Histamine H1-receptor modulation of inter-neuronal coupling among vasopressinergic neurons depends on nitric oxide synthase activation. Brain Res. 2002, 955:115-122.
71. O'Donnell P., Grace A.A. Dopaminergic modulation of dye coupling between neurons in the core and shell regions of the nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:3456-3471.
72. Bloomfield S.A., Volgyi B. The diverse functional roles and regulation of neuronal gap junctions in the retina. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:495-506.
73. Cachope R., et al. Potentiation of electrical and chemical synaptic transmission mediated by endocannabinoids. Neuron 2007, 56:1034-1047.
74. Landisman C.E., Connors B.W. Long-term modulation of electrical synapses in the mammalian thalamus. Science 2005, 310:1809-1813.
75. Wang Y., Belousov A.B. Deletion of neuronal gap junction protein connexin 36 impairs hippocampal LTP. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 502:30-32.
76. Postma F., et al. Electrical synapses formed by connexin36 regulate inhibition- and experience-dependent plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:13770-13775.
77. Guyot L.L., et al. Real-time measurement of glutamate release from the ischemic penumbra of the rat cerebral cortex using a focal middle cerebral artery occlusion model. Neurosci. Lett. 2001, 299:37-40.
78. Stoffel M., et al. Release of excitatory amino acids in the penumbra of a focal cortical necrosis. J. Neurotrauma 2002, 19:467-477.
79. Hartfield E.M., et al. Connexin 36 expression regulates neuronal differentiation from neural progenitor cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e14746.
80. Cina C., et al. Expression of connexins in embryonic mouse neocortical development. J. Comp. Neurol. 2007, 504:298-313.
81. Hanganu I.L., et al. Cellular mechanisms of subplate-driven and cholinergic input-dependent network activity in the neonatal rat somatosensory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:89-105.
82. Maher B.J., et al. Experience-dependent maturation of the glomerular microcircuit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:16865-16870.
83. Kandler K., Katz L.C. Coordination of neuronal activity in developing visual cortex by gap junction-mediated biochemical communication. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18:1419-1427.
84. De Zeeuw C.I., et al. Deformation of network connectivity in the inferior olive of connexin 36-deficient mice is compensated by morphological and electrophysiological changes at the single neuron level. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:4700-4711.
85. Deans M.R., et al. Synchronous activity of inhibitory networks in neocortex requires electrical synapses containing connexin36. Neuron 2001, 31:477-485.
86. Hormuzdi S.G., et al. Impaired electrical signaling disrupts gamma frequency oscillations in connexin 36-deficient mice. Neuron 2001, 31:487-495.
87. Maier N., et al. Reduction of high-frequency network oscillations (ripples) and pathological network discharges in hippocampal slices from connexin 36-deficient mice. J. Physiol. 2002, 541:521-528.
88. Long M.A., et al. Rhythmicity without synchrony in the electrically uncoupled inferior olive. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:10898-10905.
89. Landisman C.E., et al. Electrical synapses in the thalamic reticular nucleus. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:1002-1009.
90. Placantonakis D.G., et al. Continuous electrical oscillations emerge from a coupled network: a study of the inferior olive using lentiviral knockdown of connexin36. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:5008-5016.
91. Marshall S.P., et al. Altered olivocerebellar activity patterns in the connexin36 knockout mouse. Cerebellum 2007, 6:287-299.
92. Vervaeke K., et al. Rapid desynchronization of an electrically coupled interneuron network with sparse excitatory synaptic input. Neuron 2010, 67:435-451.
93. Long M.A., et al. Electrical synapses coordinate activity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:61-66.
94. Deans M.R., et al. Connexin36 is essential for transmission of rod-mediated visual signals in the mammalian retina. Neuron 2002, 36:703-712.
95. Guldenagel M., et al. Visual transmission deficits in mice with targeted disruption of the gap junction gene connexin36. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:6036-6044.
96. Lassen M.B., et al. Brain stimulation reward is integrated by a network of electrically coupled GABA neurons. Brain Res. 2007, 1156:46-58.
97. Allen K., et al. Gap junctions between interneurons are required for normal spatial coding in the hippocampus and short-term spatial memory. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:6542-6552.
98. Frisch C., et al. Stimulus complexity dependent memory impairment and changes in motor performance after deletion of the neuronal gap junction protein connexin36 in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2005, 157:177-185.
99. Cummings D.M., et al. Neuronal coupling via connexin36 contributes to spontaneous synaptic currents of striatal medium-sized spiny neurons. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008, 86:2147-2158.
100. Wang Y., et al. Neuronal gap junctions are required for NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity: implications in ischemic stroke. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:3551-3556.
101. Nijhawan D., et al. Apoptosis in neural development and disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2000, 23:73-87.
102. Adams S.M., et al. Pronounced cell death in the absence of NMDA receptors in the developing somatosensory thalamus. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:9441-9450.
103. Johnston M.V., et al. Mechanisms of hypoxic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Neuroscientist 2002, 8:212-220.
104. Arundine M., Tymianski M. Molecular mechanisms of glutamate-dependent neurodegeneration in ischemia and traumatic brain injury. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61:657-668.
105. Hazell A.S. Excitotoxic mechanisms in stroke: an update of concepts and treatment strategies. Neurochem. Int. 2007, 50:941-953.
106. Ozog M.A., et al. Blocked gap junctional coupling increases glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in neuron-astrocyte co-cultures. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2002, 61:132-141.
107. Belousov A.B., et al. Neuronal gap junctions play a role in the secondary neuronal death following controlled cortical impact. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 524:16-19.
108. Cusato K., et al. Gap junctions mediate bystander cell death in developing retina. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:6413-6422.
109. de Rivero Vaccari J.C., et al. Gap junctions are required for NMDA receptor-dependent cell death in developing neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:2878-2886.
110. Frantseva M.V., et al. Ischemia-induced brain damage depends on specific gap-junctional coupling. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22:453-462.
111. Decrock E., et al. Connexin-related signaling in cell death: to live or let die?. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16:524-536.
112. Ikonomidou C., Turski L. Why did NMDA receptor antagonists fail clinical trials for stroke and traumatic brain injury?. Lancet Neurol. 2002, 1:383-386.
113. Davidson J.O., et al. Connexin hemichannel blockade improves outcomes in a model of fetal ischemia. Ann. Neurol. 2012, 71:121-132.
114. Kreuzberg M.M., et al. Expression of connexin30.2 in interneurons of the central nervous system in the mouse. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2008, 37:119-134.
115. Dere E., et al. Connexin31.1 deficiency in the mouse impairs object memory and modulates open-field exploration, acetylcholine esterase levels in the striatum, and cAMP response element-binding protein levels in the striatum and piriform cortex. Neuroscience 2008, 153:396-405.