Urban restructuring, displaced households and neighbourhood change: Results from three Dutch Cities

Understanding Neighbourhood Dynamics: New Insights for Neighbourhood Effects Research

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 87-109

  Posthumus, Hanneke ^a   Bolt, Gideon ^a   Van Kempen, Ronald ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875832372     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4854-5_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Andersen, H. S. (2002). Can deprived housing areas be revitalised? Efforts against segregation and neighbourhood decay in Denmark and Europe. Urban Studies, 39 (4), 767-790.
2. Andersen, H. T., & Van Kempen, R. (2003). New trends in urban policies in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark. Cities, 20 (2), 77-86.
3. Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2000). Owner-occupation, social mix and neighbourhood impacts. Policy & Politics, 28 (1), 93-108.
4. Bauder, H. (2002). Neighbourhood effects and cultural exclusion. Urban Studies, 39 (1), 85-93.
5. Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2010). Dispersal patterns of households who are forced to move: Desegregation by demolition: A case study of Dutch cities. Housing Studies, 25 (2), 159-180.
6. Bolt, G., Van Kempen, R., & Van Weesep, J. (2009). After urban restructuring: Relocations and segregation in Dutch cities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geogra fi e, 100 (4), 502-518.
7. Brooks, F., Zugazaga, C., Wolk, J., & Adams, M. A. (2005). Resident perceptions of housing, neighbourhood, and economic conditions after relocation from public housing undergoing HOPE VI redevelopment. Research on Social Work Practice, 15 (6), 481-490.
8. Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2004). HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighbourhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate, 15 (2), 415-447.
9. Dekker, K., & Bolt, G. (2005). Social cohesion in post-war estates in the Netherlands: Differences between socioeconomic and ethnic groups. Urban Studies, 42 (13), 2447-2470.
10. Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2004). Large housing estates in Europe: Current situation and developments. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geogra fi e, 95 (5), 570-577.
11. Dietz, R. D., & Haurin, D. R. (2003). The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 54 (3), 401-450.
12. Dipasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. L. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45 (2), 354-384.
13. Freeman, L. (2000). Minority housing segregation: A test of three perspectives. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22 (1), 15-35.
14. Friedrichs, J. (1998). Do poor neighbourhoods make their residents poorer? Context effects of poverty neighbourhoods on residents. In H. J. Andress (Ed.), Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective (pp. 77-99). Aldershot: Ashgate.
15. Friedrichs, J., & Blasius, J. (2009). Attitudes of owners and renters in a deprived neighbourhood. European Journal of Housing Policy, 9 (4), 435-455.
16. Galster, G. (1983). Empirical evidence on cross-Tenure differences in house maintenance and conditions. Land Economics, 59 (1), 107-113.
17. Galster, G. C. (1999). The evolving challenges of fair housing since 1968: Open housing, integration, and the reduction of ghettoization. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 4 (3), 123-138.
18. Galster, C. G., Quercia, R. G., & Cortes, A. (2000). Identifying neighbourhood thresholds. Housing Policy Debate, 11 (3), 701-732.
19. Galster, G., Andersson, R., Musterd, S., & Kauppinen, T. M. (2008). Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? New evidence from Sweden. Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (3), 858-870.
20. Galster, G., Andersson, R., & Musterd, S. (2010). Who is affected by neighbourhood income mix? Gender, age, family, employment and income differences. Urban Studies, 47 (14), 2915-2944.
21. Gijsberts, M., & Dagevos, J. (2007). The socio-cultural integration of ethnic minorities in The Netherlands: Identifying neighbourhood effects on multiple integration outcomes. Housing Studies, 22 (5), 805-831.
22. Goetz, E. G. (2002). Forced relocation vs. voluntary mobility: The effects of dispersal programmes on households. Housing Studies, 17 (1), 107-123.
23. Graham, E., Manley, D., Hiscock, R., Boyle, P., & Doherty, J. (2009). Mixing housing tenures: Is it good for social well-being? Urban Studies, 46 (1), 139-165.
24. Hartung, J. M., & Henig, J. R. (1997). Housing vouchers and certi fi cates as a vehicle for deconcentrating the poor. Evidence from the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review, 32 (3), 403-419.
25. Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42 (3), 369-409.
26. Kingsley, G. T., Johnson, J., & Pettit, K. L. S. (2003). Patterns of section 8 relocation in the HOPE VI program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25 (4), 427-447.
27. Kintrea, K. (2007). Policies and programmes for disadvantaged neighbourhoods: Recent English experience. Housing Studies, 22 (2), 261-282.
28. Kleinhans, R. (2003). Displaced but still moving upwards in the housing career? Implications of forced residential relocation in the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 18 (4), 473-499.
29. Kleinhans, R., & Van der Laan Bouma-Doff, W. (2008). On priority and progress: Forced residential relocation and housing chances in Haaglanden, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 23 (4), 565-578.
30. Kleinhans, R., & Varady, D. (2011). Moving out and going down? A review of recent evidence on negative spillover effects of housing restructuring programmes in the United States and the Netherlands. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11 (2), 155-174.
31. Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H., & Engbersen, G. (2007). Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 44 (5/6), 1069-1091.
32. Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80 (3), 937-980.
33. Laurence, J. (2011). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multi-level analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review, 27 (1), 70-89.
34. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (2), 309-337.
35. Macintyre, S., MacDonald, L., & Ellaway, A. (2008). Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland. Social Science & Medicine, 67 (6), 900-914.
36. Manley, D., & Van Ham, M. (2011). Choice-based letting, ethnicity and segregation in England. Urban Studies, 48 (14), 1-19.
37. Manzo, L. C., Kleit, R. G., & Couch, D. (2008). ?Moving three times is like having you house on fi re once?: The experience of place and impending displacement among public housing residents. Urban Studies, 45 (9), 1855-1878.
38. Ministry VROM. (1997). Nota Stedelijke Vernieuwing. Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.
39. Ministry VROM. (2000). Mensen Wensen Wonen. Wonen in de 21ste eeuw. Den Haag: Ministerie Van VROM.
40. Ministry VROM. (2007). Actieplan Krachtwijken: van aandachtswijk naar krachtwijk. Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.
41. Ministry VROM. (2008). Stedenbeleid vanaf 2010. Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.
42. Musterd, S., & Andersson, R. (2006). Employment, social mobility and neighbourhood effects: The case of Sweden. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30 (1), 120-140.
43. Musterd, S., Andersson, R., Galster, G., & Kauppinen, T. (2008). Are immigrants? earnings in fluenced by the characteristics of their neighbors? Environment and Planning A, 40 (4), 785-805.
44. Oakley, D., & Burch fi eld, K. (2009). Out of the projects, still in the hood: The spatial constraints on public-housing residents? relocation in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31 (5), 589-614.
45. Oberwittler, D. (2007). The effects of neighbourhood poverty on adolescent problem behaviours: A multi-level analysis differentiated by gender and ethnicity. Housing Studies, 22 (5), 781-803.
46. Pendall, R. (2000). Why voucher and certi fi cate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11 (4), 881-910.
47. Permentier, M., Van Ham, M., & Bolt, G. (2009). Neighbourhood reputation and the intention to leave the neighbourhood. Environment and Planning A, 41 , 2162-2180.
48. Phillips, D. (1998). Black minority ethnic concentration, segregation and dispersal in Britain. Urban Studies, 35 (10), 1681-1702.
49. Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., Harris, L. E., Comey, J., & Cunningham, M. K. (2004). The HOPE VI program: What about the residents? Housing Policy Debate, 15 (2), 385-413.
50. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-fi rst century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30 (2), 137-174.
51. Rubenstein, J. M. (1988). Relocation of families for public improvement projects: Lessons from Baltimore. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54 (2), 185-196.
52. Sampson, J. (2009). Disparity and diversity in the contemporary city: Social (dis)order revisited. The British Journal of Sociology, 60 (1), 1-38.
53. Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 (4), 774-802.
54. Sampson, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective ef fi cacy. Science, 277 (5328), 918-924.
55. Scarborough, B. K., Like-Haislip, T. Z., Novak, K. J., Lucas, W. L., & Alarid, L. F. (2010). Assessing the relationship between individual characteristics, neighbourhood context, and fear of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38 (4), 819-826.
56. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59 (1), 79-114.
57. Slob, A., Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2008). Na de sloop. Waterbedeffecten van gebiedsgericht stedelijk beleid. Den Haag: NICIS Institute.
58. Swaroop, S., & Morenoff, J. D. (2006). Building community: The neighborhood context of social organization. Social Forces, 84 (3), 1665-1695.
59. Trudeau, D. (2006). The persistence of segregation in Buffalo, New York: Comer vs. Cisneros and geographies of relocation decisions among low-income black households. Urban Geography, 27 (1), 20-44.
60. Uitermark, J. (2003). ?Social mixing? and the management of disadvantaged neighbourhoods: The Dutch policy of urban restructuring revisited. Urban Studies, 40 (3), 531-549.
61. Van Beckhoven, E., & Van Kempen, R. (2003). Social effects of urban restructuring: A case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 18 (6), 853-875.
62. Van der Laan Bouma-Doff, W. (2007). Con fi ned contact: Residential segregation and ethnic bridges in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 44 (5/6), 997-1017.
63. Van Ham, M., & Clark, W. A. V. (2009). Neighbourhood mobility in context: Household moves and changing neighbourhoods in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A, 41 (6), 1442-1459.
64. Van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2010). The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on labour market outcomes: A longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 10 (2), 257-282.
65. Van Kempen, R., & Bolt, G. (2009). Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24 (4), 457-475.
66. Van Kempen, R., & Bolt, G. (2012). Social consequences of residential segregation and mixed neighborhoods. In D. Clapham, W.A.V. Clark, & K. Gibb (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of housing studies pp. 439-460. Chapter 23.
67. Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (2000). Vouchering out distressed subsidized developments: Does moving lead to improvements in housing and neighbourhood conditions? Housing Policy Debate, 11 (1), 115-162.
68. Varady, D. P., Walker, C. C., & Wang, X. (2001). Voucher recipient achievement of improved housing conditions in the US: Do moving distance and relocation services matter? Urban Studies, 38 (8), 1273-1304.
69. Vervoort, M., Flap, H., & Dagevos, J. (2010). The ethnic composition of the neighbourhood and ethnic minorities? social contacts: Three unresolved issues. European Sociological Review, 27 (5), 586-605.
70. Wassenberg, F. (2004). Large social housing estates: From stigma to demolition? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19 (3), 223-232.
71. Webster, C., MacDonald, R., & Simpson, M. (2006). Predicting criminality? Risk factors, neighbourhood in fluence and distance. Youth Justice, 6 (1), 7-22.
72. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
73. Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.
74. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. (1982). The police and neighborhood safety: Broken windows. Atlantic, 127 , 29-38.
75. Wyant, B. R. (2008). Multilevel impacts of perceptions of crime risk on fear of crime: Isolating endogenous impacts. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45 (1), 39-64.