Incentives and Social Capital: Are Homeowners Better Citizens?

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 354-384

  Dipasquale, Denise ^a   Glaeser, Edward L ^b  

^a City Research   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001450879     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/juec.1998.2098     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Diamond D., Lea M. Germany. J. Housing Res. 3:1992;79-114.
2. Epple D., Romer T. Mobility and redistribution. J. Political Econ. 99:1991;828-858.
3. E. Glaeser, S. Glendon, The demand for religion, 1997.
4. Green R., White M. Measuring the benefits of homeownership: effects on children. J. Urban Econ. 41:1997;441-461.
5. Hall R., Rabushka A. The Flat Tax. 1995;Hoover Institution Press, Stanford.
6. Jorgenson D., Wilcoxen P. The long-run dynamics of fundamental tax reform. Am. Econ. Rev. 87:1997;126-133.
7. Loury G. A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Women, Minorities and Employment Discrimination. 1977;Lexington Books, Lexington.
8. Lott J., Mustard D. crime deterrence and right-to-carry revealed handguns. J. Legal Studies. 26:1997;1-68.
9. A. Oswald, A conjecture on the explanation for high unemployment in the industrialized nations: Part I, 1997.
10. J. Poterba, Demographic structure and the political economy of public education, NBER, 1996.
11. R. Putnam, The case of the missing social capital, 1996.
12. J. Rappaport, Local government and economic growth, 1997.
13. Rossi P., Weber E. The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate. 7:1996;1-35.
14. Wirth L. Urbanism as a way of life. Am. J. Sociol. XLIV:1938;1-24.