Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 457-475

  Van Kempen, Ronald ^a   Bolt, Gideon ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Social cohesion; Social mix; The Netherlands; Urban policy

Indexed keywords

LOW INCOME POPULATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL POLICY; STATE ROLE; URBAN POLICY;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 70449527541     PISSN: 15664910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-009-9161-1     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Andersen, H. T. (2001). The new urban politics of Europe: The area-based approach to regeneration policy. In H. T. Andersen & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities; social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
2. K Arthurson 2002 Creating inclusive communities through balancing social mix: A critical relationship or tenuous link? Urban Policy and Research 20 3 1 29 10.1080/0811114022000005898
3. Arthurson, K. (2007). Social mix and social interaction: Do residents living in different housing tenures mix? (Paper for the conference of the European Network for Housing Research, Rotterdam, 25-28 June 2007).
4. Atkinson, R. (2005). Neighbourhoods and the impact of social mix: Crime, tenure diversification and assisted mobility. CRN paper 29. University of Bristol: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.
5. Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2002). 'Opportunities and despair, it's all in there', or, 'Every area has its problems': Everyday experiences of area effects. Glasgow: Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow.
6. G Bolt 2004 Over spreidingsbeleid en drijfzand [On dispersal policy and quicksand] Migrantenstudies 20 2 60 73
7. Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2002). Wonen in multiculturele steden [Living in multicultural cities]. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
8. Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2008). De mantra van de mix: ideeën, idealen en de praktijk [The mantra of the mix: Ideas, ideals and practices]. Utrecht: Forum: Institute for Multicultural Development.
9. G Bolt R Van Kempen M Van Ham 2008 Minority ethnic groups in the Dutch housing market: Spatial segregation, relocation dynamics and housing policy Urban Studies 45 7 1359 1384 10.1177/0042098008090678 (Pubitemid 351639461)
10. P Brophy R Smith 1997 Mixed income housing factors for success CityScape 3 2 3 32
11. Burns, D., Forrest, R., Flint, J., & Kearns, A. (2001). Empowering communities: The impact of registered social landlords on social capital. Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.
12. Dekker, K. K. (2006). Governance as glue: Urban governance and social cohesion in post-WWII neighbourhoods in the Netherlands. Utrecht: Faculty of Geosciences.
13. K Dekker G Bolt 2005 Social cohesion in post-war estates in the Netherlands: Differences between socioeconomic and ethnic groups Urban Studies 42 13 2447 2770 10.1080/00420980500380360 (Pubitemid 43090638)
14. R Forrest A Kearns 2001 Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood Urban Studies 38 12 2125 2143 10.1080/00420980120087081 (Pubitemid 33038500)
15. NE Friedkin 2005 Social cohesion Annual Review of Sociology 30 409 425 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625
16. G Galster 2007 Neighbourhood social mix as a goal for housing policy: A theoretical analysis European Journal of Housing Policy 7 1 19 43 10.1080/14616710601132526 (Pubitemid 47161363)
17. HJ Gans 1961 The balanced community-homogeneity or heterogeneity in residential areas? Journal of the American Institute of Planners 27 3 176 184
18. B Goodchild I Cole 2001 Social balance and mixed neighbourhoods in Britain since 1979: A review of discourse and practice in social housing Environment & Planning D: Society and Space 19 103 122 10.1068/d39j
19. MS Granovetter 1973 The strength of weak ties American Journal of Sociology 78 6 1360 1380 10.1086/225469
20. Harrison, M., Law, I., & Phillips, D. (2005). Migrants, minorities and housing: Exclusion, discrimination and anti-discrimination in 15 member states of the European Union. Vienna: EUMC.
21. Healey, P. (1997). Social exclusion, neighbourhood life and governance capacity. In H. Vestergaard (Ed.), Housing in Europe (pp. 88-110). Horsholm: Danish Building Research Institute.
22. Home Office. (2001). Community cohesion: A report of the independent reviewing team. London: HMSO.
23. ML Joseph RJ Chaskin HS Webber 2007 The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development Urban Affairs Review 42 3 369 409 10.1177/1078087406294043 (Pubitemid 44896463)
24. Jupp, B. (1999). Living together: Community life on mixed housing estates. London: Demos.
25. A Kearns R Forrest 2000 Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance Urban Studies 37 5/6 995 1017 10.1080/00420980050011208
26. A Kearns P Mason 2007 Mixed tenure communities and neighbourhood quality Housing Studies 22 5 661 991 10.1080/02673030701474628 (Pubitemid 47338088)
27. R Kleinhans 2004 Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19 4 367 390 10.1007/s10901-004-3041-5 (Pubitemid 40084093)
28. R Kleinhans H Priemus G Engbersen 2007 Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam Urban Studies 44 5/6 1069 1091 10.1080/00420980701256047 (Pubitemid 47161544)
29. T Maloutas MP Malouta 2004 The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: Concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 2 449 465 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00528.x (Pubitemid 38767975)
30. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. (1989). Volkshuisvesting in de Jaren Negentig [Housing in the 1990s]. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
31. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. (1997). Nota Stedelijke Vernieuwing. [Memorandum Urban renewal]. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
32. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. (2007a). Actieplan krachtwijken: van aandachtswijk naar krachtwijk [Action plan for strong districts: From attention district to strong district]. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
33. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. (2007b). Kabinetsreactie op het door de VROM-raad uitgebrachte advies 'Stad en Stijging [Reaction of the cabinet on the VROM-council advice on 'city and upward mobility']. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
34. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. (2008a). http://international.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=7336, checked on 14 February 2008.
35. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. (2008b). http://international.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=10712, checked on 14 February 2008.
36. Ministry of Justice. (2005). Jaarnota integratiebeleid 2005 [Yearly memorandum on integration policy]. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.
37. N Morrison 2003 Neighbourhoods and social cohesion: Experiences from Europe International Planning Studies 8 2 115 138 10.1080/13563470305154 (Pubitemid 36906410)
38. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007a). Wijkactieplan Indische Buurt [District Plan Indische Buurt]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
39. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007b). Kansrijk Amsterdam Noord [North Amsterdam: Full of chances]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
40. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007c). Krachtige mensen in een krachtige wijk! Investeren in kansen in de EGK-buurt in Amsterdam Zuidoost [Strong people in a strong neighbourhood: Investing in chances in the EGK-neighbourhood in Amsterdam Zuidoost]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
41. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007d). Wijkactieplan De Baarsjes: Prachtkansen voor een prachtige wijk [District plan De Baarsjes: Great chances for a great neighbourhood]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
42. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007e). Werk in uitvoering: naar een wijkactieplan Bos en Lommer! [Work in progress: Towards a district plan for Bos en Lommer]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
43. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007f). Wijkactieplan Osdorp Midden [District Plan Osdorp Midden]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
44. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007g). Buurtactieplan Overtoomse Veld [Neighbourhood Plan Overtoomse Veld]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
45. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007h). Buurtactieplan Geuzenveld [Neighbourhood Plan Geuzenveld]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
46. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007i). Buurtactieplan Slotermeer [Neighbourhood Plan Slotermeer]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
47. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2007j). Buurtactieplan Transvaal [Neighbourhood Plan Transvaal]. Amsterdam: Municipality of Amsterdam.
48. Municipality of Deventer. (2007). Wijactieplan Rivierenwijk [District Plan Rivierenwijk]. Deventer: Municipality of Deventer.
49. Municipality of The Hague. (2007a). De nieuwe aanpak voor Transvaal; wijkactieplan [The new policy for Transvaal, district plan]. The Hague: Municipality of The Hague.
50. Municipality of The Hague. (2007b). Verdrag van de Schilderswijk; wijkactieplan [Treaty of the Schilderswijk, district plan]. The Hague: Municipality of The Hague.
51. Municipality of The Hague. (2007c). De nieuwe aanpak voor krachtwijk Stationsbuurt; wijkactieplan [The new policy for the strong neighbourhood of Stationsbuurt, district plan]. The Hague: Municipality of The Hague.
52. Municipality of Utrecht. (2007a). Doe mee in Overvecht: Wijkactieplan Overvecht [Participate in Overvecht: District plan Overvecht]. Utrecht: Municipality of Utrecht.
53. Municipality of Utrecht. (2007b). Wijkactieplan Zuilen (oost) [District Plan Zuilen (east)]. Utrecht: Municipality of Utrecht.
54. Municipality of Utrecht. (2007c). Kanaleneiland leert! Wijkactieplan Kanaleneiland [Kanaleneiland learns! District Plan Kanaleneiland]. Utrecht: Municipality of Utrecht.
55. Municipality of Utrecht. (2007d). Wijkactieplan Ondiep [District Plan Ondiep]. Utrecht: Municipality of Utrecht.
56. Municipality of Zaanstad. (2007). Wijkactieplan Poelenburg [District Plan Poelenburg]. Zaanstad: Municipality of Zaanstad.
57. D Phillips 2006 Parallel lives? Challenging discourses of British Muslim self-segregation Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 1 25 40 10.1068/d60j (Pubitemid 43338051)
58. Popkin, S., Harris, J., & Cunningham, M. (2002). Families in transition: A qualitative analysis of the MTO experience, final report. Washington DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
59. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
60. RD Putnam 2007 E pluribus unum: Diversity, community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize lecture Scandinavian Political Studies 30 2 137 174 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
61. D Robinson 2005 The search for community cohesion: Key themes and dominant concepts of the public policy agenda Urban Studies 42 8 1411 1427 10.1080/00420980500150755 (Pubitemid 40990136)
62. J Rosenbaum L Stroh C Flynn 1998 Lake Parc place: A study of mixed-income housing Housing Policy Debate 9 4 703 772
63. R Tunstall 2003 'Mixed tenure' policy in the UK: Privatisation, pluralism or euphemism? Housing, Theory and Society 20 153 159 10.1080/14036090310019445 (Pubitemid 38034137)
64. J Uitermark 2003 'Social mixing' and the management of disadvantaged neighbourhoods: The Dutch policy of urban restructuring revisited Urban Studies 40 3 531 549 10.1080/0042098032000053905 (Pubitemid 36345957)
65. J Uitermark JW Duyvendak R Kleinhans 2007 Gentrification as a governmental strategy: Social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam Environment and Planning A 39 1 125 141 10.1068/a39142 (Pubitemid 46264396)
66. E Van Beckhoven R Van Kempen 2003 Social effects of urban restructuring: A case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands Housing Studies 18 6 853 875 10.1080/0267303032000135474 (Pubitemid 37436328)
67. Van Bergeijk, E., van Kokx, A., Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2008). Helpt herstructurering? Effecten van stedelijk herstructurering op wijken en bewoners [Does restructuring help? Effects of urban restructuring on neighbourhoods and residents]. Delft: Eburon.
68. Van der Horst, H., Kullberg, J., & en Deben, L. (2002). Wat wijken maakt; de wording van functionele, sociale en expressieve kwaliteiten van Vreewijk, Zuidwijk en Ommoord [What makes neighbourhoods?]. Utrecht/The Hague: Nethur/DGW.
69. Van der Meer, C. E. (1996). Monitoring van buurten: Signalering en analyse van probleemcumulatie [Monitoring neighbourhoods: Signalling and analysis of problem cumulation]. Amsterdam: AME.
70. Van Doorn, J. A. A. (1955/1970). Wijk en stad: reële integratiekaders? [District and city: Realistic frames for integration?]. In S. Groenman & H. De Jager (Eds.), Staalkaart der Nederlandse sociologie (pp. 231-253). Assen: Van Gorcum.
71. M Van Ham P Feijten 2008 Who wants to leave the neighbourhood? The effect on moving wishes of being different from the neighbourhood population Environment and Planning A 40 5 1151 1170 10.1068/a39179 (Pubitemid 351721686)
72. Van Kempen, R., & Van Beckhoven, E. (2006). Urban governance and integrated policies. In R. van Kempen, A. Murie, T. Knorr-Siedow, & I. Tosics (Eds.), Regenerating large housing estates in Europe: A guide to better practice (pp. 171-179). Utrecht: Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht, Utrecht University.
73. B Völker H Flap S Lindenberg 2007 When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods European Sociological Review 23 1 99 114 10.1093/esr/jcl022
74. Vranken, J. (2001). Unravelling the social strands of poverty: Differentiation, fragmentation, inequality, and exclusion. In H. T. Andersen & R. Van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance (pp. 71-92). Aldershot: Ashgate.
75. Wittebrood, K., & Van Dijk, T. (2007). Aandacht voor de wijk-effecten van herstructurering op de leefbaarheid en de veiligheid [Focus on the neighbourhood-effects of urban restructuring on liveability and safety]. The Hague: SCP.