Cochlear implantation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 139, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 265-272

  Gaylor, James M ^a   Raman, Gowri ^a   Chung, Mei ^a   Lee, Jounghee ^a,b   Rao, Madhumathi ^a   Lau, Joseph ^a   Poe, Dennis S ^a  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Kyonggi University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA EXTRACTION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; META ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENT; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT; STROOP TEST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84875830178     PISSN: 21686181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1744     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Sprinzl GM, Riechelmann H. Currenttrends in treating hearing loss in elderly people: a review of the technology and treatment options: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2010;56(3):351-358
2. National Institutes of Health. Research to improve the lives of people with communication disorders. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; June 26, 2010. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/ statistics/Pages/quick.aspx. Accessed May 15, 2012
3. Cohen SM, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Primary care approach to hearing loss: the hidden disability. Ear Nose Throat J. 2005;84(1):26, 29-31, 44
4. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Fleming C, Beil T. Screening adults aged 50 years or older for hearing loss: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):347-355.
5. Raman G, Lee J, Chung M, et al. Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. Contract 290 200710055 1
6. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville, MD: AHRQ; October 2007. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/repFiles/2007- 10DraftMethodsGuide.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2011
7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-269, W64.
8. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Decision memo for cochlear implantation (CAG-00107N). Baltimore, MD: CMS; April 4, 2005. http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx? NCAId=134&ver=14&NcaName=Cochlear+Implantation&bc= BEAAAAAAEAAA&&fromdb=true. Accessed January 12, 2012
9. Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health TechnolAssess. 2009;13(44):1-330
10. Cooper H, Hedges L, Valentine J. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009
11. Bai Z, Stephens D. Subjective outcome measures aftercochlear implantation: over-all measures. Audiolog Med. 2005;3(4):212-219. doi:10.1080/16513860500474476. (Pubitemid 43205658)
12. Parkinson AJ, Arcaroli J, Staller SJ, Arndt PL, Cosgriff A, Ebinger K. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear. 2002; 23(1)(suppl):41S-48S. (Pubitemid 34195173)
13. Mawman DJ, Bhatt YM, Green KM, O'Driscoll MP, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT. Trendsand outcomes in the Manchester adult cochlear implant series. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(4):331-339 (Pubitemid 38981321)
14. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear mplantation in postlingually deafened adults, III: prospective evaluation of an actuarial approach to defining a criterion. Ear Hear. 2004;25(4):361-374.
15. Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, et al. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adultcochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear. 2004;25(4):375-387. (Pubitemid 39031182)
16. Bassim MK, Buss E, Clark MS, et al. MED-EL Combi40+ cochlear implantation n adults. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(9):1568-1573. (Pubitemid 41330663)
17. Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI. Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(10):1887-1894. (Pubitemid 41475910)
18. Rama-López J, Cervera-Paz FJ, Manrique M. Cochlear implantation of patients with far-advanced otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27(2):153-158.
19. Orabi AA, Mawman D, Al-Zoubi F, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31(2):116-122.
20. Morris LG, Mallur PS, Roland JT Jr, Waltzman SB, Lalwani AK. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(1):25-30. (Pubitemid 46052237)
21. Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurootol. 2008; 13(3):193-205. (Pubitemid 351520944)
22. Krueger B, Joseph G, Rost U, Strauss-Schier A, Lenarz T, Buechner A. Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(4):509-512.
23. Roditi RE, Poissant SF, Bero EM, Lee DJ. A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(4):449-454.
24. Bradley J, Bird P, Monteath P, Wells JE. Improved speech discrimination after cochlear implantation in the Southern Cochlear Implant Adult Programme. N Z Med J. 2010;123(1321):34-44.
25. Budenz CL, Cosetti MK, Coelho DH, et al. The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(3):446-453.
26. Palmer CS, Niparko JK, Wyatt JR, Rothman M, de Lissovoy G. A prospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implant. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(11):1221-1228. (Pubitemid 29526318)
27. Lenarz M, Sönmez H, Joseph G, Büchner A, Lenarz T. Effect of gender on the hearing performance of adult cochlear implant patients. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122(5):1126-1129.
28. Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA, et al. Multicenter US bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use. Ear Hear. 2008;29(1):20-32.
29. Dunn CC, Noble W, Tyler RS, Kordus M, Gantz BJ, Ji H. Bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users compared on speech perception in noise. Ear Hear. 2010; 31(2):296-298.
30. Koch DB, Soli SD, Downing M, Osberger MJ. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation: prospective study in adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;11(2): 84-99.
31. Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear. 2006;27(6): 714-731. (Pubitemid 44691232)
32. Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):648-655. (Pubitemid 38609680)
33. Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J. Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2009;30(4):419-431.
34. Mosnier I, Sterkers O, Bebear JP, et al. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(2):106-114.
35. Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Oakley S, Gantz BJ, Noble W. Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation. Ear Hear. 2008; 29(3):352-359. (Pubitemid 351652232)
36. Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Horizontalplane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007;28(4):524-541 (Pubitemid 47026224)
37. Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M, et al. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System. OtolNeurotol. 2005; 26(5):988-998 (Pubitemid 41330717)
38. Zeitler DM, Kessler MA, Terushkin V, et al. Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: a retrospective analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(3):314-325. (Pubitemid 351450813)
39. Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Otol Neurotol 2009;30(3):313-318.
40. Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects n bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 2004; 25(3):197-204 (Pubitemid 38736303)
41. Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2004;25(3):205-214 (Pubitemid 38736304)
42. Verschuur CA, Lutman ME, Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2005; 26(5):965-971 (Pubitemid 41330713)
43. Summerfield AQ, Barton GR, Toner J, et al. Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(suppl 1):S99-S107 (Pubitemid 44385182)
44. Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, et al. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25(6):958-968. (Pubitemid 39496818)
45. Cullington HE, Zeng FG. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification. Ear Hear. 2011;32(1):16-30.
46. Hawthorne G, Hogan A, Giles E, et al. Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program. Int J Audiol. 2004;43(4):183-192 (Pubitemid 38520344)
47. Damen GW, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PF, Mulder JJ, Mylanus EA. Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136(4):597-604 (Pubitemid 46517769)
48. Klop WM, Boermans PP, Ferrier MB, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JH. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(5):615-621
49. Hogan A, Hawthorne G, Kethel L, et al. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes from adult cochlear implantation: a cross-sectional survey. Cochlear Implants Int. 2001;2(2):115-128.
50. Most T, Shrem H, Duvdevani I. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted adults with prelingual deafness. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010;31(6):418-423
51. Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Wuyts FL, Cochet E, Hofkens A, Van de Heyning PH. Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 2005;26(2):188-195. (Pubitemid 40418651)
52. Wanscher JH, Faber CE, Grøntved AM. Cochlear implantation in deaf adults: effect on quality of life. Ugeskr Laeger 2006;168(33):2656-2659 (Pubitemid 44285313)
53. Liu B, Chen XQ, Kong Y, et al. Quality of life after cochlear implantation in postingually deaf adults [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008;88(22):1550-1552
54. Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Haupt H, et al. Cochlear implantation has a positive influence on quality of life, tinnitus, and psychological comorbidity. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(10):2220-2227.
55. Noble W, Tyler R, Dunn C, Bhullar N. Hearing handicap ratings among different profiles of adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2008;29(1):112-120.