A predictive model of cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 449-454

  Roditi, Rachel E ^a,b   Poissant, Sarah F ^a,c,d   Bero, Eva M ^d   Lee, Daniel J ^e,f  

^a Memorial Medical Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult; CNC; Cochlear implant; HINT; Postlingual; Predictive model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH;

EID: 68249121134     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819d3480     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, et al. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:909-916
2. Waltzman SB, Fisher SG, Niparko JK, et al. Predictors of postoperative performance with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;165:15-18
3. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, et al. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999;20:445-452
4. Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:582-589
5. Gomaa NA, Rubinstein JT, Lowder MW, et al. Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Ear Hear 2003;24:539-544
6. Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD, et al. Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:1049-1054
7. Chen JM, Shipp D, Al-Abidi A, et al. Does choosing the WworseW ear for cochlear implantation affect outcome? Otol Neurotol 2001;22:335-339
8. Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, et al. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:342-348
9. David EE, Ostroff JM, Shipp D, et al. Speech coding strategies and revised cochlear implant candidacy: an analysis of post-implant performance. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:228-233
10. Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Bowditch S, et al. Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 2005;26:7S-16S.
11. Green KM, Bhatt YM, Mawman DJ, et al. Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults. Cochlear Implants Int 2007;8:1-11.
12. Ruffin CV, Tyler RS, Witt SA, et al. Long-term performance of clarion 1.0 cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1183-1190
13. Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Brightwell T, et al. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1747-1752
14. Hiraumi H, Tsuji J, Kanemaru S, et al. Cochlear implants in postlingually deafened patients. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2007;(557):17-21.
15. Battmer RD, Gupta SP, Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, et al. Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:185-187
16. Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:648-655
17. Verschuur CA, Lutman ME, Ramsden R, et al. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:965-971
18. Wackym PA, Runge-Samuelson CL, Firszt JB, et al. More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2007;28:80S-5S.