Subjective outcome measures after cochlear implantation: Overall measures

Audiological Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 212-219

  Bai, Zhong ^a   Stephens, Dafydd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Deafness; Open ended questionnaire; Quality of life; Self rating questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MUSIC; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REDUCTION; SOCIAL LIFE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TELEPHONE; TINNITUS;

EID: 32144445476     PISSN: 1651386X     EISSN: 16513835     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16513860500474476     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Saunders E. The role of the cochlear implant. In: Stephens D, editor. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology 5th edn, Vol 2. London: Butterworths, 1987; p 506-31.
2. Hallberg LR, Ringdahl A. Living with cochlear implants: experiences of 17 adult patients in Sweden. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 115-21.
3. Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN. Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 165: 31-48.
4. Kelsall DC, Shallop JK, Burnelli T. Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otolaryngol 1995; 16: 609-15.
5. Birger M, Lindbæk M, Harris S. Cochlear implants and quality of life: a prospective study. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 186-94.
6. Stephens D. Audiological Rehabilitation. In: Stephens D, editor. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology 5th edn, Vol 2. London: Butterworths, 1987; p 446-80.
7. Stephens D. Audiological Rehabilitation. In: Stephens D, editor. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology 6th edn, Vol 2. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997; p 1-36.
8. Barcham LJ, Stephens SDG. The use of an open-ended problems questionnaire in auditory rehabilitation. Br J Audiol 1980; 14: 49-54.
9. Stephens SDG, Meredith R. Qualitative reports of hearing aids benefit. Clin Rehab 1991; 5: 225-9.
10. Zhao F, Stephens SDG, Sim SW, Meredith R. The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants. Clin Otolaryngol 1997; 22: 254-9.
11. Cox R, ed. Proceedings of the workshop 'Self-reported outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation including hearing aids'. Ear Hear 2000; 21: S1-115.
12. Stephens SDG, Zhao F. Effectiveness of self-rating measures of auditory activity limitation and participation restriction in patients with hearing impairment. Iranian Audiol 2002; 1: 33-40.
13. Tyler RS, Kelsay D. Advantages and disadvantages reported by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Am J Otol 1990; 11: 282-9.
14. Habib RG, Hinchcliffe R. Subjective magnitude of auditory impairment. Audiol 1978; 17: 68-76.
15. Bai Z, Stephens SDG, Zhao F. Subjective outcome measures after cochlear implantation: relationships between generic measures and specific measures changes in individual patients. (Submitted).
16. WHO QOL Group. Measuring quality of life: the development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHO QOL). Geneva: WHO 1993.
17. Harris JP, Anderson JP, Novak R. An outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients. Archs Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121: 398-404.
18. Hogan A. Implant outcomes: towards a mixed methodology for evaluating the efficacy of adult cochlear implant programmes. Disabil Rehab 1997; 6: 235-43.
19. Knutson JF, Murray KT, Husarek S, Westerhouse K, Woodworth G, Gantz BJ, et al. Psychological change over 54 months of cochlear implant use. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 191-201.