Reconstructing paternal genotypes to infer patterns of sperm storage and sexual selection in the hawksbill turtle

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2301-2312

  Phillips, Karl P ^a,b   Jorgensen, Tove H ^a,c   Jolliffe, Kevin G ^c   Jolliffe, San Marie ^d   Henwood, Jock ^d   Richardson, David S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^d Cousine Island ^*  (Seychelles)

Author keywords

heterozygosity; marine turtles; mating systems; paternity biases; relatedness

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PATERNITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SPERMATOZOON; TURTLE;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PATERNITY; REPRODUCTION; SPERMATOZOA; TURTLES;

ANIMALIA; CHELONIIDAE; ERETMOCHELYS IMBRICATA; TESTUDINES;

EID: 84875826459     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12235     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Aggarwal RK, Velavan TP, Udaykumar D, et al,. (2004) Development and characterization of novel microsatellite markers from the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 77-79. (Pubitemid 38261317)
2. Aggarwal RK, Lalremruata A, Velavan TP, Sowjanya AP, Singh L, (2008) Development and characterization of ten novel microsatellite markers from olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea). Conservation Genetics, 9, 981-984.
3. Akaike H, (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 19, 716-723.
4. Allen ZC, Shah NJ, Grant A, Derand GD, Bell D, (2010) Hawksbill turtle monitoring in Cousin Island Special Reserve, Seychelles: An eight-fold increase in annual nesting numbers. Endangered Species Research, 11, 195-200.
5. Amos W, Wilmer JW, Fullard K, et al,. (2001) The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, 2021-2027. (Pubitemid 32964469)
6. Aparicio JM, Ortego J, Cordero PJ, (2006) What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci? Molecular Ecology, 15, 4659-4665. (Pubitemid 44749577)
7. Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M, (2005) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: The strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. American Naturalist, 165, S26-S37. (Pubitemid 40561136)
8. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T, (2004) Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Molecular Ecology, 13, 3021-3031. (Pubitemid 39290228)
9. Birkhead TR, Hunter FM, (1990) Mechanisms of sperm competition. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 5, 48-52. (Pubitemid 120036257)
10. Birkhead TR, Møller AP, (1992) Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, London.
11. Birkhead TR, Møller AP, (1993) Sexual selection and the temporal separation of reproductive events-sperm storage data from reptiles, birds and mammals. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 50, 295-311. (Pubitemid 2039308)
12. Birkhead TR, Møller AP, (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
13. Bjorndal KA, Reich KJ, Bolten AB, (2010) Effect of repeated tissue sampling on growth rates of juvenile loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 88, 271-273.
14. Boomsma JJ, (2009) Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 364, 3191-3207.
15. Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J, (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 50, 395-420.
16. Booth J, Peters JA, (1972) Behavioural studies on the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) in the sea. Animal Behaviour, 20, 808-812.
17. Bowen BW, Karl SA, (2007) Population genetics and phylogeography of sea turtles. Molecular Ecology, 16, 4886-4907. (Pubitemid 350157765)
18. Box GEP, Cox DR, (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology, 26, 211-252.
19. Bretman A, Tregenza T, (2005) Measuring polyandry in wild populations: A case study using promiscuous crickets. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2169-2179. (Pubitemid 40772430)
20. Brouwer L, Barr I, van de Pol M, et al,. (2010) MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3444-3455.
21. Brown JL, (1997) A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 60-65.
22. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC, (2009) A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2746-2765.
23. Cohas A, Yoccoz NG, Da Silva A, Goossens B, Allaine D, (2006) Extra-pair paternity in the monogamous alpine marmot (Marmota marmota): The roles of social setting and female mate choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 597-605. (Pubitemid 43209134)
24. Cole BJ, (1983) Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the Hymenoptera. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 191-201.
25. Collet J, Richardson DS, Worley K, Pizzari T, (2012) Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 8641-8645.
26. Crim JL, Spotila LD, Spotila JR, et al,. (2002) The leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, exhibits both polyandry and polygyny. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2097-2106.
27. Csilléry K, Johnson T, Beraldi D, et al,. (2006) Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates. Genetics, 173, 2091-2101. (Pubitemid 44285687)
28. Cutuli G, Cannicci S, Vannini M, Fratini S, (2013) Influence of mating order on courtship displays and stored sperm utilization in Hermann's tortoises (Testudo hermanni hermanni). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 273-281.
29. van Dam RP, Diez CE, Balazs GH, et al,. (2008) Sex-specific migration patterns of hawksbill turtles breeding at Mona Island, Puerto Rico. Endangered Species Research, 4, 85-94. (Pubitemid 351308757)
30. Diamond AW, (1976) Breeding biology and conservation of hawksbill turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata L., on Cousin Island. Seychelles. Biological Conservation, 9, 199-215.
31. Dutton PH, Frey A, (2009) Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the green turtle (Chelonia mydas). Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 354-356.
32. Eberhard WG, (1996) Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice Princeton University Press. Princeton, USA.
33. Ewing HE, (1943) Continued fertility in female box turtles following mating. Copeia, 1943, 112-114.
34. Faria CMA, Zarza E, Reynoso VH, Emerson BC, (2010) Predominance of single paternity in the black spiny-tailed iguana: conservation genetic concerns for female-biased hunting. Conservation Genetics, 11, 1645-1652.
35. FitzSimmons NN, Moritz C, Moore SS, (1995) Conservation and dynamics of microsatellite loci over 300 million years of marine turtle evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12, 432-440.
36. FitzSimmons NN, Limpus CJ, Norman JA, et al,. (1997a) Philopatry of male marine turtles inferred from mitochondrial DNA markers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 8912-8917. (Pubitemid 27335139)
37. FitzSimmons NN, Moritz C, Limpus CJ, Pope L, Prince R, (1997b) Geographic structure of mitochondrial and nuclear gene polymorphisms in Australian green turtle populations and male-biased gene flow. Genetics, 147, 1843-1854. (Pubitemid 27525472)
38. Frazier J, (1971) Observations on sea turtles at Aldabra Atoll. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 260, 373-410.
39. Fromhage L, Kokko H, Reid JM, (2009) Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution, 63, 684-694.
40. Gist DH, Congdon JD, (1998) Oviductal sperm storage as a reproductive tactic of turtles. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 282, 526-534. (Pubitemid 28490524)
41. Gist DH, Jones JM, (1989) Sperm storage within the oviduct of turtles. Journal of Morphology, 199, 379-384.
42. Gist DH, Michaelson JA, Jones JM, (1990) Autumn mating in the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Herpetologica, 46, 331-336.
43. Godley BJ, Blumenthal JM, Broderick AC, et al,. (2008) Satellite tracking of sea turtles: Where have we been and where do we go next? Endangered Species Research, 4, 3-22. (Pubitemid 351308761)
44. Griffith SC, (2007) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: neglected components of direct and indirect selection. American Naturalist, 169, 274-281. (Pubitemid 46184980)
45. Griffith SC, Immler S, (2009) Female infidelity and genetic compatibility in birds: The role of the genetically loaded raffle in understanding the function of extrapair paternity. Journal of Avian Biology, 40, 97-101.
46. Halliday TR, (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Mate Choice. (ed., Bateson P,), pp. 3-32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Hansson B, Jack L, Christians JK, et al,. (2007) No evidence for inbreeding avoidance in a great reed warbler population. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 157-164. (Pubitemid 46026326)
48. Hays GC, Fossette S, Katselidis KA, Schofield G, Gravenor MB, (2010) Breeding periodicity for male sea turtles, operational sex ratios, and implications in the face of climate change. Conservation Biology, 24, 1636-1643.
49. Hitchins PM, Bourquin O, Hitchins S, (2004) Nesting success of hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) on Cousine Island, Seychelles. Journal of Zoology, 264, 383-389. (Pubitemid 39622962)
50. Holland B, Rice WR, (1998) Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution, 52, 1-7. (Pubitemid 28195144)
51. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO, (1990) The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Holleley CE, Geerts PG, (2009) Multiplex Manager 1.0: A cross-platform computer program that plans and optimizes multiplex PCR. BioTechniques, 46, 511-517.
53. Ireland JS, Broderick AC, Glen F, et al,. (2003) Multiple paternity assessed using microsatellite markers, in green turtles Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758) of Ascension Island, South Atlantic. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 291, 149-160. (Pubitemid 36684744)
54. Jamieson IG, Taylor SS, Tracy LN, Kokko H, Armstrong DP, (2009) Why some species of birds do not avoid inbreeding: insights from New Zealand robins and saddlebacks. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 575-584.
55. Jennions MD, (1997) Female promiscuity and genetic incompatibility. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12, 251-253.
56. Jennions MD, Petrie M, (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21-64. (Pubitemid 30135849)
57. Jensen MP, Abreu-Grobois FA, Frydenberg J, Loeschcke V, (2006) Microsatellites provide insight into contrasting mating patterns in arribada vs. non-arribada olive ridley sea turtle rookeries. Molecular Ecology, 15, 2567-2575. (Pubitemid 44050723)
58. Johnston EE, Rand MS, Zweifel SG, (2006) Detection of multiple paternity and sperm storage in a captive colony of the central Asian tortoise, Testudo horsfieldii. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84, 520-526. (Pubitemid 44049526)
59. Joseph J, Shaw PW, (2011) Multiple paternity in egg clutches of hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata). Conservation Genetics, 12, 601-605.
60. Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Vanderbroeck M, et al,. (1992) Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature, 357, 494-496.
61. Kenta T, Gratten J, Haigh NS, et al,. (2008) Multiplex SNP-SCALE: A cost-effective medium-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping method. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 1230-1238.
62. Kleven O, Fossoy F, Laskemoen T, et al,. (2009) Comparative evidence for the evolution of sperm swimming speed by sperm competition and female sperm storage duration in passerine birds. Evolution, 63, 2466-2473.
63. Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI, (2002) The sexual selection continuum. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 269, 1331-1340. (Pubitemid 34753665)
64. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J, (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 270, 653-664. (Pubitemid 36359742)
65. Landry C, Garant D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L, (2001) 'Good genes as heterozygosity': The major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, 1279-1285. (Pubitemid 32622382)
66. Lee PLM, (2008) Molecular ecology of marine turtles: new approaches and future directions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 356, 25-42.
67. Lee PLM, Hays GC, (2004) Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 6530-6535. (Pubitemid 38586008)
68. Limpus CJ, (1993) The green turtle, Chelonia mydas, in Queensland: breeding males in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Wildlife Research, 20, 513-523. (Pubitemid 24417764)
69. Lin G, Chang A, Yap HW, Yue GH, (2008) Characterization and cross-species amplification of microsatellites from the endangered Hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate). Conservation Genetics, 9, 1071-1073.
70. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM, (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
71. Michalczyk Ł, Millard AL, Martin OY, et al,. (2011) Inbreeding promotes female promiscuity. Science, 333, 1739-1742.
72. Miller JD, (1997) Reproduction in Sea Turtles. In: The Biology of Sea Turtles (eds, Lutz PL, Musick JA,), pp. 51-82. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
73. Miro-Herrans AT, Velez-Zuazo X, Acevedo JP, McMillan WO, (2008) Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellites from the critically endangered hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 1098-1101.
74. Møller AP, Alatalo RV, (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 266, 85-91. (Pubitemid 29039279)
75. Monzõn-Argüello C, Munoz J, Marco A, Lõpez-Jurado LF, Rico C, (2008) Twelve new polymorphic microsatellite markers from the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) and cross-species amplification on other marine turtle species. Conservation Genetics, 9, 1045-1049.
76. Mortimer JA, Donnelly M, (2008) Marine Turtle Specialist Group 2007 IUCN Red List Status Assessment Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). http://www.iucn-mtsg.org/red-list/ei/index.shtml, p. 121.
77. Murphy RW, Berry KH, Edwards T, McLuckie AM, (2007) A genetic assessment of the recovery units for the Mojave population of the desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 6, 229-251.
78. Newcombe RG, (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 857-872. (Pubitemid 28185165)
79. Nicholls JA, Double MC, Rowell DM, Magrath RD, (2000) The evolution of cooperative and pair breeding in thornbills Acanthiza (Pardalotidae). Journal of Avian Biology, 31, 165-176. (Pubitemid 30622690)
80. Owens DW, (1980) The comparative reproductive physiology of sea turtles. American Zoologist, 20, 549.
81. Palmer KS, Rostal DC, Grumbles JS, Mulvey M, (1998) Long-term sperm storage in the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Copeia, 3, 702-705. (Pubitemid 28382209)
82. Parker GA, (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 45, 525-567.
83. Parker GA, (1990) Sperm competition games-raffles and roles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 242, 120-126.
84. Parker GA, Pizzari T, (2010) Sperm competition and ejaculate economics. Biological Reviews, 85, 897-934.
85. Pearse DE, Janzen FJ, Avise JC, (2001) Genetic markers substantiate long-term storage and utilization of sperm by female painted turtles. Heredity, 86, 378-384. (Pubitemid 32722478)
86. Pearse DE, Janzen FJ, Avise JC, (2002) Multiple paternity, sperm storage, and reproductive success of female and male painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) in nature. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 164-171. (Pubitemid 36059137)
87. Pizzari T, Cornwallis CK, Lovlie H, Jakobsson S, Birkhead TR, (2003) Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature, 426, 70-74. (Pubitemid 37432542)
88. van de Pol MV, Wright J, (2009) A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models. Animal Behaviour, 77, 753-758.
89. Queller DC, Goodnight KF, (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258-275.
90. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
91. Raymond M, Rousset F, (1995) GENEPOP (Version-1.2)-population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
92. Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T, von Schantz T, (2005) MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 272, 759-767. (Pubitemid 41411134)
93. Rogers DW, Denniff M, Chapman T, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A, (2008) Male sexual ornament size is positively associated with reproductive morphology and enhanced fertility in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. Bmc Evolutionary Biology, 8, 8.
94. Shamblin BM, Faircloth BC, Dodd M, et al,. (2007) Tetranucleotide microsatellites from the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 784-787. (Pubitemid 47329359)
95. Shamblin BM, Faircloth BC, Dodd MG, et al,. (2009) Tetranucleotide markers from the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) and their cross-amplification in other marine turtle species. Conservation Genetics, 10, 577-580.
96. Sheldon BC, (1994) Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 257, 25-30. (Pubitemid 24236167)
97. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, et al,. (2004) Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: Theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity, 93, 255-265. (Pubitemid 39147529)
98. Slatyer RA, Mautz BS, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, (2012) Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: A meta-analysis. Biological Reviews, 87, 1-33.
99. Stanback M, Richardson DS, Boix-Hinzen C, Mendelsohn J, (2002) Genetic monogamy in Monteiro's hornbill, Tockus monteiri. Animal Behaviour, 63, 787-793.
100. Stewart KR, Dutton PH, (2011) Paternal genotype reconstruction reveals multiple paternity and sex ratios in a breeding population of leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea). Conservation Genetics, 12, 1101-1113.
101. The MathWorks Inc. (2010) MATLAB 7.11. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA.
102. Theissinger K, FitzSimmons NN, Limpus CJ, Parmenter CJ, Phillott AD, (2009) Mating system, multiple paternity and effective population size in the endemic flatback turtle (Natator depressus) in Australia. Conservation Genetics, 10, 329-346.
103. Tregenza T, Wedell N, (1998) Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution, 52, 1726-1730. (Pubitemid 29054004)
104. Uller T, Olsson M, (2008) Multiple paternity in reptiles: Patterns and processes. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2566-2580. (Pubitemid 351724937)
105. Varian-Ramos CW, Webster MS, (2012) Extrapair copulations reduce inbreeding for female red-backed fairy-wrens, Malurus melanocephalus. Animal Behaviour, 83, 857-864.
106. Wallace BP, DiMatteo AD, Bolten AB, et al,. (2011) Global conservation priorities for marine turtles. PLoS ONE, 6, e24510.
107. Wang J, (2011a) A new likelihood estimator and its comparison with moment estimators of individual genome-wide diversity. Heredity, 107, 433-443.
108. Wang JL, (2011b) COANCESTRY: A program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 141-145.
109. Wang J, Santure AW, (2009) Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy. Genetics, 181, 1579-1594.
110. Weigensberg I, Fairbairn DJ, (1994) Conflicts of interest between the sexes-a study of mating interactions in a semiaquatic bug. Animal Behaviour, 48, 893-901.
111. While GM, Uller T, Wapstra E, (2011) Variation in social organization influences the opportunity for sexual selection in a social lizard. Molecular Ecology, 20, 844-852.
112. Whitaker N, (2006) Immaculate conception, incubation protocols, and egg characteristics of the Ganges softshell turtle (Aspideretes gangeticus). Contemporary Herpetology, 2006, 1-6.
113. Wilson EB, (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22, 209-212.
114. Wood JR, Wood FE, (1980) Reproductive biology of captive green sea turtles Chelonia mydas. American Zoologist, 20, 499-505.
115. Wright LI, Fuller WJ, Godley BJ, et al,. (2012a) Reconstruction of paternal genotypes over multiple breeding seasons reveals male green turtles do not breed annually. Molecular Ecology, 279, 2122-2127.
116. Wright LI, Stokes KL, Fuller WJ, et al,. (2012b) Turtle mating patterns buffer against disruptive effects of climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 21, 3625-3635.
117. Zbinden JA, Largiader AR, Leippert F, Margaritoulis D, Arlettaz R, (2007) High frequency of multiple paternity in the largest rookery of Mediterranean loggerhead sea turtles. Molecular Ecology, 16, 3703-3711. (Pubitemid 47383114)
118. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 264, 69-75.