Vision and proprioception in action monitoring by young and older adults

Neurobiology of Aging

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1864-1872

  Rand, Miya K ^a   Wang, Lei ^b   Müsseler, Jochen ^b   Heuer, Herbert ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aging; Movement; Visual capture; Visuomotor transformation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CIRCLING BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY ANALYSIS; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875824760     PISSN: 01974580     EISSN: 15581497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.01.021     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams J.A., Dijkstra S. Short-term memory for motor responses. J. Exp. Psychol. 1966, 71:314-318.
2. Balslev D., Christensen L.O.D., Lee J.-H., Law I., Paulson O.B., Miall R.C. Enhanced accuracy in novel mirror drawing after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced proprioceptive deafferentation. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:9698-9702.
3. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M. Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J. Physiol. 2007, 578:387-396.
4. Bedford F.L. Constraints on perceptual learning: objects and dimensions. Cognition 1995, 54:253-297.
5. Betts L.R., Sekuler A.B., Bennett P.J. The effects of aging on orientation discrimination. Vision Res. 2007, 47:1769-1780.
6. Bock O. Components of sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 160:259-263.
7. Bock O., Eckmiller R. Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: evidence for amplitude rather than position control. Exp. Brain Res. 1986, 62:451-458.
8. Bojko A., Kramer A.F., Peterson M.S. Age equivalence in switch costs for prosaccade and antisaccade tasks. Psychol. Aging 2004, 19:226-234.
9. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
10. Carp J., Park J., Polk T.A., Park D.C. Age differences in neural distinctiveness revealed by multi-voxel pattern analysis. NeuroImage 2011, 56:736-743.
11. Cheng K., Shettleworth S.J., Huttenlocher J., Rieser J.J. Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133:625-637.
12. Collins T., Schicke T., Röder B. Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use. Cognition 2008, 109:363-371.
13. Cressman E.K., Salomonczyk D., Henriques D.Y. Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 205:533-544.
14. Cunningham H.A. Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1989, 15:493-506.
15. Ernst M.O., Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust perceipt. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:162-169.
16. Gepshtein S., Burge J., Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity. J. Vision 2005, 5:1013-1023.
17. Goble D.J., Coxon J.P., Wenderoth N., Van Impe A., Swinnen S.P. Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009, 33:271-278.
18. Graziano M.S., Cooke D.F., Taylor C.S. Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 2000, 290:1782-1786.
19. Hay J.C., Pick H.L., Ikeda K. Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychon. Sci. 1965, 2:215-216.
20. Heuer H., Hegele M. Adaptation to visuo-motor rotations in younger and older adults. Psychol. Aging 2008, 23:190-202.
21. Heuer, H., Hegele, M., Rand, M.K., in press. Age-related variations in the control of electronic tool, in: Schlick, C., Wegge, J., Frieling, E. (Eds.), Age-differentiated work systems. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
22. Heuer H., Sangals J. Task-dependent mixtures of coordinate systems in visuomotor transformations. Exp. Brain Res. 1998, 119:224-236.
23. Heuer H., Sülzenbrück S. The influence of the dynamic transformation of a sliding lever on aiming errors. Neuroscience 2012, 207:137-147.
24. Kennedy D.M., Christou E.A. Greater amount of visual information exacerbates force control in older adults during constant isometric contractions. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 213:351-361.
25. Ketcham C.J., Seidler R.D., Van Gemmert A.W., Stelmach G.E. Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2002, 57:P54-P64.
26. Knoblich G., Kircher T.T.J. Deceiving oneself about being in control: conscious detection of changes in visuomotor coupling. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2004, 30:657-666.
27. Lajoie Y., Paillard J., Teasdale N., Bard C., Fleury M., Forget R., Lamarre Y. Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects: visuoproprioceptive conflict. Neurology 1992, 42:1104-1106.
28. Li S.C., Lindenberger U., Sikström S. Aging cognition: from neuromodulation to representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2001, 5:479-486.
29. Li S.C., Huxhold O., Schmiedek F. Aging and attenuated processing robustness. Evidence from cognitive and sensorimotor functioning. Gerontology 2004, 50:28-34.
30. Li S.C., Sikström S. Integrative neurocomputational perspectives on cognitive aging, neuromodulation, and representation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002, 26:795-808.
31. Liang Z., Yang Y., Li G., Zhang J., Wang Y., Zhou Y., Leventhal A.G. Aging affects the direction selectivity of MT cells in rhesus monkeys. Neurobiol. Aging 2010, 31:863-873.
32. Müsseler J., Sutter C. Perceiving one's own movements when using a tool. Conscious. Cogn. 2009, 18:359-365.
33. Neggers S.F.W., Bekkering H. Ocular gaze is anchored to the target of an ongoing pointing movement. J. Neurophysiol. 2000, 83:639-651.
34. Nieuwenhuis S., Ridderinkhof K.R., de Jong R., Kok A., van der Molen M.W. Inhibitory inefficiency and failures of intention activation: age-related decline in the control of saccadic eye movements. Psychol. Aging 2000, 15:635-647.
35. Ofori E., Samson J.M., Sosnoff J.J. Age-related differences in force variability and visual display. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 203:299-306.
36. Paillard J., Brouchon M. Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. The Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior 1968, 37-55. Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL. S.J. Freedman (Ed.).
37. Ramachandran V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran D., Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995, 377:489-490.
38. Rand M.K., Stelmach G.E. Effects of hand termination and accuracy requirements on eye-hand coordination in older adults. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 219:39-46.
39. Reed C.L., Betz R., Garza J.P., Roberts R.J. Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 2010, 72:236-245.
40. Simoneau M., Teasdale N., Bourdin C., Bard C., Fleury M., Nougier V. Aging and postural control: postural perturbations caused by changing the visual anchor. J. Americ. Geriatr. Soc. 1999, 47:235-240.
41. Smeets J.B.J., van den Dobbelsteen J.J., de Grave D.D.J., van Beers M.J., Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:18781-18786.
42. Sosnoff J.J., Newell K.M. Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force. Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 170:423-432.
43. Takahashi C., Diedrichsen J., Watt S.J. Integration of vision and haptics during tool use. J. Vis. 2009, 9:3.1-3.13.
44. Tewes U. Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene 1991, Huber, Toronto. Ontario, Canada. Rev. ed.
45. Van Beers R.J., Sittig A.C., Denier van der Gon J.J. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 81:1355-1364.
46. Van Beers R.J., Wolpert D.M., Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:834-837.
47. Wang L., Sutter C., Müsseler J., Dangel R.J.Z., Disselhorst-Klug C. Perceiving one's own limb movements with conflicting sensory feedback: the role of model of movement control and age. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:289.
48. Welford A.T. Signal, noise, performance, and age. Hum. Factors 1981, 23:97-109.