Integration of vision and haptics during tool use

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Takahashi, Chie ^a   Diedrichsen, Jörn ^a   Watt, Simon J ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cross modal integration; Haptics; Optimality; Sensory integration; Tool use; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HAND; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STIMULATION; TOOL USE; TOUCH; VISION;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HAND; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67249132082     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.6.3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bonifazi, S., Farnè, A., Rinaldesi, L., & Làdavas, E. (2007). Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space through tool-use: Spatial extension or shift of the multi-sensory area. Journal of Neuropsychology, 1, 101-114.
2. Bresciani, J. P., Dammeier, F., & Ernst, M. O. (2006). Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. Journal of Vision, 6(5):2, 554-564, http://journalofvision.org/6/5/2/, doi:10.1167/6.5.2.
3. Clark, J. J., & Yuille, A. L. (1990). Data fusion for sensory information processing systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Di Luca, M., Ernst, M., & Adams, W. (2008). Amodal multimodal integration [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):526, 526a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/526/, doi:10.1167/8.6.526.
5. Ernst, M. O. (2005). A Bayesian view on multimodal cue integration. In G. Knoblich, I. M. Thornton, M. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (chap. 6, pp. 105-131). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Ernst, M. O. (2007). Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. Journal of Vision, 7(5):7, 1-14, http://journalofvision.org/7/5/7/, doi:10.1167/7.5.7.
7. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Human integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
8. Farné, A., & Ládavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 11, 1645-1649.
9. Gepshtein, S., & Banks, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology, 13, 483-488.
10. Gepshtein, S., Burge, J., Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2005). The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity. Journal of Vision, 5(11):7, 1013-1023 http://journalofvision.org/5/11/7/, doi:10.1167/5.11.7.
11. Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2007). Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception, 36, 1523-1533.
12. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12):1, 967-992, http://journalofvision.org/ 4/12/1/, doi:10.1167/4.12.1.
13. Holmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2004). Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letters, 372, 6267.
14. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330.
15. Jackson, C. V. (1953). Visual factors in auditory localization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 52-65.
16. Knill, D. C. (2007). Robust cue integration: A Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. Journal of Vision, 7(7):5, 1-24, http://journalofvision.org/7/7/5/, doi:10.1167/7.7.5.
17. Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004). The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neuroscience, 27, 712-719.
18. Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 43, 2539-2558.
19. Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shams, L. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE, 2, e943.
20. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
21. Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 79-86.
22. Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2007). Programming tool-use actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 692-704.
23. Oruç, I., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research, 43, 2451-2468.
24. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1997). Adaptive spatial alignment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Roach, N. W., Heron, J., & McGraw, P. V. (2006). Resolving multisensory conflict: A strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 2159-2168.
26. Shams, L., Ma, W. J., & Beierholm, U. (2005). Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept. Neuroreport, 16, 1923-1927.
27. Warren, D. H., & Cleaves, W. T. (1971). Visual-proprioceptive interaction under large amounts of conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 206-214.
28. Witkin, H. A., Wapner, S., & Leventhal, T. (1952). Sound localization with conflicting visual and auditory cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 58-67.
29. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880-1882.
30. Yuille, A. L., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics. In D. C. Knill & W. Richards (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (chap. 4, pp. 123-161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.