Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals cell-type-specific paternal growth dominance

Cell Reports

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 960-967

  Hippenmeyer, Simon ^a,b   Johnson, Randy L ^c   Luo, Liqun ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOMATOMEDIN B;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL TYPE; CHROMOSOME 12; CHROMOSOME 7; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENOME IMPRINTING; MOSAIC ANALYSIS WITH DOUBLE MARKER; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PATERNAL GROWTH DOMINANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CHROMOSOMES; GENES, DOMINANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR II; LIVER; LUNG; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MOSAICISM; MYOCARDIUM; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PHENOTYPE; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84875811096     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barlow D.P. Genomic imprinting: a mammalian epigenetic discovery model. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45:379-403.
2. Bartolomei M.S., Ferguson-Smith A.C. Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3:a002592.
3. Bartolomei M.S., Zemel S., Tilghman S.M. Parental imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. Nature 1991, 351:153-155.
4. Barton S.C., Surani M.A., Norris M.L. Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature 1984, 311:374-376.
5. Caspary T., Cleary M.A., Perlman E.J., Zhang P., Elledge S.J., Tilghman S.M. Oppositely imprinted genes p57(Kip2) and igf2 interact in a mouse model for Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:3115-3124.
6. Cattanach B.M., Kirk M. Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice. Nature 1985, 315:496-498.
7. Chao W., D'Amore P.A. IGF2: epigenetic regulation and role in development and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008, 19:111-120.
8. Davies K., Bowden L., Smith P., Dean W., Hill D., Furuumi H., Sasaki H., Cattanach B., Reik W. Disruption of mesodermal enhancers for Igf2 in the minute mutant. Development 2002, 129:1657-1668.
9. DeChiara T.M., Efstratiadis A., Robertson E.J. A growth-deficiency phenotype in heterozygous mice carrying an insulin-like growth factor II gene disrupted by targeting. Nature 1990, 345:78-80.
10. DeChiara T.M., Robertson E.J., Efstratiadis A. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene. Cell 1991, 64:849-859.
11. Espinosa J.S., Wheeler D.G., Tsien R.W., Luo L. Uncoupling dendrite growth and patterning: single-cell knockout analysis of NMDA receptor 2B. Neuron 2009, 62:205-217.
12. Feinberg A.P. Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease. Nature 2007, 447:433-440.
13. Ferguson-Smith A.C. Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:565-575.
14. Ferguson-Smith A.C., Cattanach B.M., Barton S.C., Beechey C.V., Surani M.A. Embryological and molecular investigations of parental imprinting on mouse chromosome 7. Nature 1991, 351:667-670.
15. Ferrón S.R., Charalambous M., Radford E., McEwen K., Wildner H., Hind E., Morante-Redolat J.M., Laborda J., Guillemot F., Bauer S.R., et al. Postnatal loss of Dlk1 imprinting in stem cells and niche astrocytes regulates neurogenesis. Nature 2011, 475:381-385.
16. Garfield A.S., Cowley M., Smith F.M., Moorwood K., Stewart-Cox J.E., Gilroy K., Baker S., Xia J., Dalley J.W., Hurst L.D., et al. Distinct physiological and behavioural functions for parental alleles of imprinted Grb10. Nature 2011, 469:534-538.
17. Guo C., Yang W., Lobe C.G. A Cre recombinase transgene with mosaic, widespread tamoxifen-inducible action. Genesis 2002, 32:8-18.
18. Hatada I., Mukai T. Genomic imprinting of p57KIP2, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in mouse. Nat. Genet. 1995, 11:204-206.
19. Hippenmeyer S., Youn Y.H., Moon H.M., Miyamichi K., Zong H., Wynshaw-Boris A., Luo L. Genetic mosaic dissection of Lis1 and Ndel1 in neuronal migration. Neuron 2010, 68:695-709.
20. Lehtinen M.K., Zappaterra M.W., Chen X., Yang Y.J., Hill A.D., Lun M., Maynard T., Gonzalez D., Kim S., Ye P., et al. The cerebrospinal fluid provides a proliferative niche for neural progenitor cells. Neuron 2011, 69:893-905.
21. Liu C., Sage J.C., Miller M.R., Verhaak R.G., Hippenmeyer S., Vogel H., Foreman O., Bronson R.T., Nishiyama A., Luo L., Zong H. Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals tumor cell of origin in glioma. Cell 2011, 146:209-221.
22. Mabb A.M., Judson M.C., Zylka M.J., Philpot B.D. Angelman syndrome: insights into genomic imprinting and neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Trends Neurosci. 2011, 34:293-303.
23. Matsuoka S., Edwards M.C., Bai C., Parker S., Zhang P., Baldini A., Harper J.W., Elledge S.J. p57KIP2, a structurally distinct member of the p21CIP1 Cdk inhibitor family, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Genes Dev. 1995, 9:650-662.
24. McGrath J., Solter D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 1984, 37:179-183.
25. McLaughlin K.J., Kochanowski H., Solter D., Schwarzkopf G., Szabó P.E., Mann J.R. Roles of the imprinted gene Igf2 and paternal duplication of distal chromosome 7 in the perinatal abnormalities of androgenetic mouse chimeras. Development 1997, 124:4897-4904.
26. Muzumdar M.D., Luo L., Zong H. Modeling sporadic loss of heterozygosity in mice by using mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:4495-4500.
27. Nicholls R.D., Knepper J.L. Genome organization, function, and imprinting in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2001, 2:153-175.
28. Stanger B.Z. Organ size determination and the limits of regulation. Cell Cycle 2008, 7:318-324.
29. Stanger B.Z., Tanaka A.J., Melton D.A. Organ size is limited by the number of embryonic progenitor cells in the pancreas but not the liver. Nature 2007, 445:886-891.
30. Surani M.A., Barton S.C., Norris M.L. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 1984, 308:548-550.
31. Tang S.H., Silva F.J., Tsark W.M., Mann J.R. A Cre/loxP-deleter transgenic line in mouse strain 129S1/SvImJ. Genesis 2002, 32:199-202.
32. Tasic B., Miyamichi K., Hippenmeyer S., Dani V.S., Zeng H., Joo W., Zong H., Chen-Tsai Y., Luo L. Extensions of MADM (mosaic analysis with double markers) in mice. PLoS One 2012, 7:e33332.
33. Wilkinson L.S., Davies W., Isles A.R. Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:832-843.
34. Williamson, C.M., B.A., Thomas, S., Beechey, C.V., Hancock, J., Cattanach, B.M., and Peters, J. (2013). MRC Harwell, Oxfordshire. World Wide Web Site-Mouse Imprinting Data and References. http://www.har.mrc.ac.uk/research/genomic_imprinting/.
35. Zong H., Espinosa J.S., Su H.H., Muzumdar M.D., Luo L. Mosaic analysis with double markers in mice. Cell 2005, 121:479-492.