Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates

Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 242-250

  Supalla, Ted ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919519082     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410607447     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Cogill, D. (2000). Classifier predicates, linguistic structures, or templated visual representations? Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. DeMatteo, A. (1977). Visual imagery and visual analogues. In L. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: Recent perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 109-136). New York: Academic Press.
3. Dufour, R.(1992). The use of gesture for communicative purposes: Can gestures become grammaticized? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
4. Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 51, 696-719.
5. Kegl, J., &Wilbur, R. (1976). Where does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphlogy, and phonology vs. stylistic variations in American Sign Language. Papers from the 12th Regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 376-396). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
6. Klima, E., Bellugi, U., Battison, R., Boyes-Braem, P., Fischer, S., Frishberg, N., Lane, H., Lentz, E. M., Newkirk, D., Newport, E., Pedersen, C. C.,&Siple, P. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Liddell, S. K. (2000). Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In K. Emmorey,&H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 303-320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science,14, 11-28.
10. Newport, E. L.,&Supalla, T. (1980). The structuring of language: Clues from the acquisition of signed and spoken language. In U. Bellugi &M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Signed and spoken language: Biological constraints on linguistic form, Berlin.
11. Osugi,Y., Supalla,T.&Webb, R. (1999). The use of word elicitation to identify distinctive gestural systems on Amami Island. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2, 87-112.
12. Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
14. Schwartz, C. (1979), Discrete vs. continuous encoding in American Sign Language and non-linguistic gestures, Unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.
15. Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign Language Structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers, 8. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.
16. Stokoe,W. C., Casterline, D., & Croneberg, D. (1965). Dictionary of American Sign Language.Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
17. Supalla, T. (1978). Morphology of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. In F. Caccamise & D. Hicks (Eds.), ASL in a bilingual, bicultural context. Proceedings of the Second National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching (pp. 27-45).Washington, DC: National Association of the Deaf.
18. Supalla, T. (1980, October). A preliminary field guide to playing with sign. Paper presented at the Third National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, Boston, MA.
19. Supalla, T. (1982). Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion in American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
20. Supalla, T. (1986). The classifier system in American Sign Language. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classification and categorization (pp. 181-214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Supalla, T. (1990). Serial verbs of motion in ASL. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research: Vol. 1. Linguistics (pp. l27-152). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Supalla, T. (in press). Making historical sign language materials accessible: A prototype database of early ASL. Sign Language and Linguistics.
23. Supalla, T., &Webb, R. (1995). The grammar of International Sign: A new look at pidgin languages. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Sign, gesture and space (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Webb, R. (1996). Linguistic properties of metaphoric gestures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Departments of Linguistics and Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester.
25. Wilbur,R.B. (1987). American Sign Language: Linguistic and applied dimensions. Boston: Little, Brown.
26. Woodward, J. (1974). Implicational variation in American Sign Language: Negative incorporation. Sign Language Studies, 5, 20-30.
27. Woodward, J. (1976). Signs of change: Historical variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 10, 81-94.