Effects of consumption of sucromalt, a slowly digestible carbohydrate, on mental and physical energy questionnaire responses

Nutritional Neuroscience

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 83-95

  Dammann, Kristen W ^a   Bell, Margie ^b   Kanter, Mitch ^c   Berger, Alvin ^a,d  

^a CARGILL INC   (United States)

^b ClinData Services Inc   (United States)

^c Health and Nutrition Insights   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mental energy; Mood; Physical energy; Slowly digestible carbohydrate; Sucromalt

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; GLUCOSE; SUCROMALT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; GLYCEMIC INDEX; HUMAN; HUNGER; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL ENERGY STATE SCALE; MENTAL FATIGUE STATE SCALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSICAL ENERGY STATE SCALE; PHYSICAL FATIGUE STATE SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SOMNOLENCE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; DIGESTION; DISACCHARIDES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; GLYCEMIC INDEX; HUMANS; HUNGER; INSULIN; MALE; MENTAL FATIGUE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; POSTPRANDIAL PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRES; SLEEP; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875745478     PISSN: 1028415X     EISSN: 14768305     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/1476830512Y.0000000034     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Chmelik S. Energy for adults? Natural Products Insider 2011;16: 58-60.
2. Nutrition Horizon. Consumers call for sustained energy and mental performance - latest BENEO research. Arnhem, The Netherlands: CNS Media BV; 2011 [cited 2011 July 6]. Available from: http://www.nutritionhorizon.com/search-results/Consumers-Call-for-Sustained-Energy-and-Mental-Performance-Latest-BENEO-Research.html.
3. Clauson KA, Shields KM, McQueen CE, Persad N. Safety issues associated with commercially available energy drinks. Pharmacy Today 2008;14:52-64.
4. Heckman MA, Sherry K, Gonzalez de Mejia E. Energy drinks: an assessment of their market size, consumer demographics, ingredient profile, functionality, and regulations in the United States. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2010;9:303-317.
5. Watford M, Goodridge AG. Regulation of fuel utilization. In: Stipanuk MH (ed.) Biochemical and physiological aspects of human nutrition. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000. p. 384-407.
6. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to glycaemic carbohydrates and maintenance of normal brain function (ID 603, 653) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J 2011;9:2226.
7. Smit HJ, Cotton JR, Hughes SC, Rogers PJ. Mood and cognitive performance effects of 'energy' drink constituents: caffeine, glucose and carbonation. Nutr Neurosci 2004;7:127-139.
8. Scholey AB, Kennedy DO. Cognitive and physiological effects of an 'energy drink': an evaluation of the whole drink and of glucose, caffeine and herbal flavouring fractions. Psychopharmacology 2004;176:320-330.
9. Kennedy DO, Scholey AB. A glucose-caffeine 'energy drink' ameliorates subjective and performance deficits during prolonged cognitive demand. Appetite 2004;42:331-333.
10. Natural Marketing Institute. Health and Wellness Trends Study 2011.
11. Nilsson A, Radeborg K, Bjorck I. Effects of differences in postprandial glycaemia on cognitive functions in healthy middle-aged subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007;63:113-120.
12. Ingwersen J, Defeyter MA, Kennedy DO, Wesnes KA, Scholey AB. A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning. Appetite 2007;49:240-244.
13. Benton D, Ruffin M-P, Lassel T, Nabb S, Messaoudi M, Vinoy S, et al. The delivery rate of dietary carbohydrates affects cognitive performance in both rats and humans. Psychopharmacology 2003;166:86-90.
14. Jenkins D, Wolever T, Taylor R, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin J, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:362-366.
15. University of Sydney. The official website of the Glycemic Index and GI Database. University of Sydney; [cited 2011 April 7]. Available from: http:// www.glycemicindex.com/.
16. Gilsenan MB, de Bruin EA, Dye L. The influence of carbohydrate on cognitive performance: a critical evaluation from the perspective of glycaemic load. Br J Nutr 2009;101:941-949.
17. Sünram-Lea S, Foster J, Durlach P, Perez C. Glucose facilitation of cognitive performance in healthy young adults: examination of the influence of fast-duration, time of day and pre-consump-tion plasma glucose levels. Psychopharmacology 2001;157: 46-54.
18. Moghaddam E, Vogt JA, Wolever TMS. The effects of fat and protein on glycemic responses in nondiabetic humans vary with waist circumference, fasting plasma insulin, and dietary fiber intake. J Nutr 2006;136:2506-2511.
19. Mondazzi L, Arcelli E. Glycemic index in sport nutrition. J Am Coll Nutr 2009;28:455S-463S.
20. Sparks MJ, Selig SS, Febbraio MA. Pre-exercise carbohydrate ingestion: effect of the glycemic index on endurance exercise performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:844-849.
21. Moore LJS, Midgley AW, Thurlow S, Thomas G, Mc Naughton LR. Effect of the glycaemic index of a pre-exercise meal on metabolism and cycling time trial performance. J Sci Med Sport 2010;13:182-188.
22. Vanschoonbeek K, Lansink M, van Laere KMJ, Senden JMG, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJC. Slowly digestible carbohydrate sources can be used to attenuate the postprandial glycemic response to the ingestion of diabetes-specific enteral formulas. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:631-640.
23. Grysman A, Carlson T, Wolever TMS. Effects of sucromalt on postprandial responses in human subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008;62:1364-1371.
24. Gorby HE, Brownawell AM, Falk MC. Do specific dietary constituents and supplements affect mental energy? Review of the evidence. Nutr Rev 2010;68:697-718.
25. O'Connor PJ. Mental and Physical State and Trait Energy and Fatigue Scales (unpublished work, available from author). Athens: University of Georgia; 2002.
26. Hoddes E, Zarcone V, Smythe H, Phillips R, Dement WC. Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach. Psychophysiology 1973;10:431-436.
27. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965;52:591-611.
28. Levene H. Robust tests for the equality of variance. In: Olkin I (ed.) Contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. 1st ed. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press; 1960. p. 278-292.
29. Peng G. Testing Normality of Data using SAS®. San Diego, CA: Pharmasug; 2004.
30. Maridakis V, Herring MP, O'Connor PJ. Sensitivity to change in cognitive performance and mood measures of energy and fatigue in response to differing doses of caffeine or breakfast. Int J Neurosci 2009;119:975-994.
31. Akaike H. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 1987;52: 317-332.
32. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1995;57:289-300.
33. Alish CJ, Garvey WT, Maki KC, Sacks GS, Hustead DS, Hegazi RA, et al. A diabetes-specific enteral formula improves glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:419-425.
34. Donohoe RT, Benton D. Glucose tolerance predicts performance on tests of memory and cognition. Physiol Behav 2000;71: 395-401.
35. Payne J, Maher F, Simpson I, Mattice L, Davies P. Glucose transporter Glut 5 expression in microglial cells. Glia 1997;21: 327-331.
36. Peters A, Kubera B, Hubold C, Langemann D. The selfish brain: stress and eating behavior. Front Neurosci 2011;5:1-11.
37. Grillo CA, Piroli GG, Hendry RM, Reagan LP. Insulin-stimulated translocation of GLUT4 to the plasma membrane in rat hippocampus is PI3-kinase dependent. Brain Res 2009;1296: 35-45.
38. Dekker MJ, Su Q, Baker C, Rutledge AC, Adeli K. Fructose: a highly lipogenic nutrient implicated in insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010;299:E685-694.
39. Jeukendrup AE. Carbohydrate and exercise performance: the role of multiple transportable carbohydrates. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2010;13:452-457.
40. Dye L, Gilsenan MB, Quadt F, Martens VEG, Bot A, Lasikiewicz N, et al. Manipulation of glycemic response with isomaltulose in a milk-based drink does not affect cognitive performance in healthy adults. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010;54: 506-515.
41. Kashimura J, Nagai Y, Ebashi T. The effect of palatinose on mental concentration in humans. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2003;49:214-216.
42. Taib MN, Shariff ZM, Wesnes KA, Saad HA, Sariman S. The effect of high lactose-isomaltulose on cognitive performance of young children. A double blind cross-over design study. Appetite 2012;58:81-87.
43. Lieberman HR. Cognitive methods for assessing mental energy. Nutr Neurosci 2007;10:229-242.
44. O'Connor PJ. Mental energy: assessing the mood dimension. Nutr Rev 2006;64:S7-S9.
45. Maridakis V, O'Connor PJ, Tomporowski PD. Sensitivity to change in cognitive performance and mood measures of energy and fatigue in response to morning caffeine alone or in combination with carbohydrate. Int J Neurosci 2009;119: 1239-1258.
46. Cook DB, O'Connor PJ, Lange G, Steffener J. Functional neuroimaging correlates of mental fatigue induced by cognition among chronic fatigue syndrome patients and controls. NeuroImage 2007;36:108-122.