Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: A review

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 705-713

  Bouquet, A ^a   Juga, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

breeding programme; dairy cattle; genetic gain; genomic selection; inbreeding rates

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; LACTATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; LACTATION; MALE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 84875699711     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112002248     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abdel-Azim G and Schnell S 2007. Genetic impacts of using female-sorted semen in commercial herds. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1554-1563.
2. Agerholm JS, Bendixen C, Andersen O and Arnbjerg J 2001. Complex vertebral malformation in Holstein calves. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 13, 283-289.
3. Bastiaansen JWM, Costar A, Calus MPL, van Arendonk JAM and Bovenhuis H 2012. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genetics Selection Evolution 44, 3.
4. Boichard D and Brochard M 2012. New phenotypes for new breeding goals in dairy cattle. Animal 6, 544-550.
5. Boichard D, Ducrocq V, Fritz S and Colleau JJ 2010. Where is dairy cattle breeding going? A vision of the future. Interbull Bulletin 41, 63-68.
6. Brøndum RF, Rius-Vilarrasa E, Strande'n I, Su G, Gulbrandtsen B, Fikse WF and Lund MS 2011. Reliabilities of genomic prediction using combined reference data of the Nordic Red dairy cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4700-4707.
7. Buch LH, Sørensen MK, Berg P, Pedersen LD and Sørensen AC 2012a. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of bulls on genetic gain. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 129, 138-151.
8. Buch LH, Kargo M, Berg P, Lassen J and Sørensen AC 2012b. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits. Animal 6, 880-886.
9. Bulmer MG 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 254pp.
10. Calus MPL and Veerkamp RF 2011. Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 26.
11. Calus MPL, de Haas Y, PszczolaMand Veerkamp RF 2011. Predicted response of genomic selection for new traits using combined cow and bull reference populations. Interbull Bulletin 44, 231-234.
12. Colleau JJ, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Baur A, Dupassieux D, Boscher MY, Journaux L, Eggen A and Boichard D 2009. Simulating the potential of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding. Proceedings of the 16th Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, Institut de l0Elevage, Paris, France, 419pp.
13. Colleau JJ, Fritz S, Ponsart C, Le Bourhis D, Lacaze S, Tissier M, Mervant G, Amigues Y, Druet T, Malafosse A, Boichard D and Humblot P 2008. The value of embryo typing in a marker assisted selection program for dairy cattle. Proceedings of the 15th Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, Institut de l0Elevage, Paris, France, pp. 427-430.
14. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P andWoolliams JA 2007. Inbreeding in genomewide selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 369-376.
15. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B and Woolliams JA 2010. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185, 1021-1031.
16. Dassonneville R, Brøndum RF, Druet T, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Ducrocq V and Su G 2011. Effect of imputing markers from a lowdensity chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3679-3686.
17. de Cara MAR, Fernandez J, Toro MA and Villanueva B 2011. Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes. Journal of animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 456-464.
18. Dekkers JCM 2007. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 331-341.
19. Dekkers JCM, Gibson JP, Bijma P and Van Arendonk JAM 2004. Design and optimization of animal breeding programmes. Lecture notes for the 'Animal Breeding Strategies' Course, Iowa State University. Retrieved December 19, 2011, from http://www.anslab.iastate.edu/Class/AnS652X/Chapter1,2.pdf
20. de Roos APW, Schrooten C, Veerkamp RF and Van Arendonk JAM 2011. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1559-1567.
21. Engelsma KA, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL and Windig JJ 2011. Consequences when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 473-481.
22. Ferná ndez J, Meuwissen THE, Toro MA and Ma? ki-Tanila A 2011. Management of genetic diversity in small farm animal populations. Animal 5, 1684-1698.
23. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 1998. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans: management of small populations at risk, FAO, Roma, Italy, 219 pp.
24. Fritz S, Guillaume F, Croiseau P, Baur A, Hozé C, Dassonneville R, Boscher MY, Journaux L, Boichard D and Ducrocq V 2010. Implementing genomic selection in the three main French dairy cattle breeds. Proceedings of the 17th Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, Institut de l0Elevage, Paris, France, pp. 455-458.
25. Georges M and Massey JM 1991. Velogenetics, or the synergistic use of markerassisted selection and germ-line manipulation. Theriogenology 35, 151-159.
26. Goddard ME 2009. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response. Genetica 136, 245-257.
27. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ and Meuwissen THE 2011. Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 409-421.
28. Habier D, Fernando RL and Dekkers JCM 2007. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177, 2389-2397.
29. Harris BL and Johnson DL 2010. Genomic predictions for New Zealand dairy bulls and integration with national genetic evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1243-1252.
30. Harris BL, Creagh FE, Winkelman AM and Johnson DL 2011. Experiences with the Illumina high-density Bovine BeadChip. Interbull Bulletin 44, 3-7.
31. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ and Goddard ME 2009. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433-443.
32. Hu XS and Li B 2006. Additive genetic variation and the distribution of QTN effects among sites. Journal of Theoretical Biology 243, 76-85.
33. Humblot P, Le Bourhis D, Fritz S, Colleau JJ, Gonzalez C, Guyader-Joly C, Malafosse A, Heyman Y, Amigues Y, Tissier M and Ponsart C 2010. Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle. Veterinary Medicine International 2010, e192787.
34. Ibanez-Escriche N and Gonzalez-Recio O 2011. Promises, pitfalls and challenges in genomic selection in breeding programs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural research 9, 404-413.
35. Jorjani H, Zumbach B, Du? rr J and Santus E 2011. Joint genomic evaluation in Brown Swiss populations. Interbull Bulletin 41, 8-14.
36. Ko? nig S and Swalve HH 2009. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5292-5303.
37. Ko? nig S, Simianer H and Willam A 2009. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programmes. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 382-391.
38. Korpiaho PI, Strandén I andMa? ntysaari EA 2003. Bull selection across age classes and variable female reproductive rates in an open nucleus breeding scheme of dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavia A: Animal Science 53, 74-82.
39. Lande R and Thompson R 1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124, 743-756.
40. Lillehammer M, Meuwissen THE and Sonesson AK 2011. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 493-500.
41. Lund MS, de Roos APW, de Vries AG, Druet T, Ducrocq V, Fritz S, Guillaume G, Guldbrandtsen B, Liu Z, Reents R, Schrooten C, Seefried M and Su G 2011. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 43.
42. Mackay TFC, Stone EA and Ayroles JF 2009. The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nature Reviews Genetics 10, 565-577.
43. McHugh N, Meuwissen THE, Cromie AR and Sonesson AK 2011. Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4109-4118.
44. Meuwissen THE 1997. Maximizing the response to selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75, 934-940.
45. Meuwissen THE 2009. Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 35.
46. Meuwissen THE and Woolliams JA 1994. Effective sizes of livestock populations to prevent a decline in fitness. Theoretical Applied Genetics 89, 1019-1026.
47. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ and Goddard ME 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829.
48. Muir WM 2007. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 342-355.
49. Patry C, Jorjani H and Ducrocq V 2011. Implementation of genomic selection at national level: impact of pre-selection and biased national BLUP evaluations on international genetic evaluations. Interbull Bulletin 44, 67-73.
50. Pedersen LD, Kargo M, Berg P, Voergaard J, Buch LH and Sørensen AC 2012. Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle breeding programmes: sexed semen cannot replace multiple ovulation and embryo transfer as superior reproductive technology. Journal of animal Breeding and Genetics 129, 152-163.
51. Pryce JE and Daetwyler HD 2012. Designing dairy cattle breeding schemes under genomic selection: a review of internation research. Animal Production Science 52, 107-114.
52. Pryce JE, Goddard ME, Raadsma HW and Hayes BJ 2010. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5455-5466.
53. Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA and Calus MPL 2012. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 389-400.
54. Schaeffer LR 2006. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 123, 218-223.
55. Schefers JM and Weigel KA 2012. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Animal Frontiers 2, 4-9.
56. Smith C 1967. Improvement of metric traits through specific genetic loci. Animal Production 9, 349-358.
57. Soller M 1978. The use of loci associated with quantitative effects in dairy cattle improvement. Animal Production 27, 133-139.
58. Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA and Meuwissen THE 2010. Maximising genetic gain whilst controlling rates of genomic inbreeding using genomic optimum contribution selection. Proceedings of the 9th WCGALP, Leipzig, Germany, 150 p.
59. Sørensen AC and Sørensen MK 2009. Genotyping both males and females is favourable in genomic dairy cattle breeding schemes. Interbull Bulletin 40, 94-97.
60. Strauss S 2010. Biotech breeding goes bovine. Nature Biotechnology 6, 540-543.
61. Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Gregersen BR and Lund MS 2010. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1175-1183.
62. Su G, Brondum RF, Ma P, Guldbrandtsen B, Aamand GP and Lund MS 2011. Genomic prediction using high-density SNP markers in Nordic Holstein and Red. Interbull Bulletin 44, 157-161.
63. VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR, van Tassel CP, Sonstegaard TS and Schenkel F 2009. Benefits from cooperation in genomics. Interbull Bulletin 39, 67-72.
64. Veerkamp RF, Berry DP, Wall E, de Haas Y, McParland S, Coffey M and Calus MPL 2011. Use of phenotypes from research herds to develop genomic selection for scarcely recorded traits like feed efficiency. Interbull Bulletin 44, 249-254.
65. Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Fernandez J and Toro MA 2005. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1747-1752.
66. Weigel KA, de Los Campos G, Vazquez AI, Rosa GJ, Gianola D and Van Tassel CP 2010. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5423-5435.
67. Wiggans GR, VanRaden PM and Cooper TA 2011. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3202-3211.
68. Williams JL 2005. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology. Scientific and Technical Review 24, 379-391.
69. Ytournel F, Willam A and Simianer H 2011. Impact of genomic selection on functional traits in a dual-urpose cattle breeding program. Proceedings of the 62nd EAAP meeting, Stavanger, Norway, Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, p. 213.