Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 93, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 5455-5466

  Pryce, J E ^a   Goddard, M E ^a,b   Raadsma, H W ^c   Hayes, B J ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breeding program; Genetic gain; Genomic selection; Inbreeding

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; DATABASES, GENETIC; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENOME; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; INTERNATIONALITY; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 78649390511     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3256     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abdel-Azim G., Schnell S. Genetic impacts of using female sorted semen in commercial and nucleus herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:1554-1563.
2. Bijma P., Woolliams J.A. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value. Genetics 2000, 156:361-373.
3. Bulmer M.G. The effect of selection on variability. Am. Nat. 1971, 105:201-211.
4. Cameron N.D. Selection indices and prediction of genetic merit in animal breeding 1997, CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
5. Cunningham E.P. Multistage selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1975, 46:55-61.
6. The in-calf project-A progress report 2000, Dairy Research and Development Corporation, DRDC, Melbourne, Australia.
7. DeJarnette J.M., Nebel R.L., Marshall C.E., Moreno J.F., McCleary C.R., Lenz R.W. Effect of sex-sorted sperm dosage on conception rates in Holstein heifers and lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:1778-1785.
8. Ducrocq V., Quaas R.L. Prediction of genetic response on truncation selection across generations. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71:2543-2553.
9. Falconer D.S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1989, Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, NY. 3rd ed.
10. Goddard M.E. View to the future: Could genomic evaluation become the standard. Interbull Bull. 2009, 39:83-88.
11. Gowe R.S., Robertson A., Latter B.D.H. Environment and poultry breeding problems. 5. The design of poultry control strains. Poult. Sci. 1959, 38:462-471.
12. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
13. Haile-Mariam M., Morton J.M., Goddard M.E. Estimates of genetic parameters for fertility traits of Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle. Anim. Sci. 2003, 76:35-42.
14. Harris B.L., Johnson D.L., Spelman R.J. Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. Proc. 36th ICAR Biennial Session, Niagara Falls, NY 2008.
15. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:433-443.
16. Johnson L.A., Flook J.P., Hawk H.W. Sex pre-selection in rabbits: Live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. Biol. Reprod. 1989, 41:199-203.
17. Jopson N.B., Am P.R., McEwan J.C. Comparison of two-stage selection breeding programmes for terminal sire sheep. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2004, 64:213-216.
18. König S., Simianer H., Willam A. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:382-391.
19. König S., Swalve H.H. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5292-5303.
20. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
21. Miglior F., Muir B.L., Van Doormaal B.J. Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:1255-1263.
22. Moser G., Tier B., Crump R.E., Khatkar M.S., Raadsma H.W. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:56.
23. Raadsma H.W., Tammen I. Biotechnologies and their potential impact on animal breeding and production: A review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2005, 45:1021-1032.
24. Rendel J.M., Robertson A. The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle. J. Genet. 1950, 50:21-31.
25. Rutten M.J.M., Bijma P., Woolliams J.A., van Arendonk J.A.M. SelAction: Software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs. J. Hered. 2002, 93:456-458.
26. Schaeffer L.R. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006, 123:218-223.
27. Spelman R.J., Garrick D.J. Utilisation of marker assisted selection in a commercial dairy cow population. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1997, 47:139-147.
28. Van Doormaal B.J., Kistemaker G.J. Dairy genetic improvement through artificial insemination, performance recording and genetic evaluation. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 83:385-392.
29. VanRaden P.M., Sullivan P.G. International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2010, 42:7.
30. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
31. Weigel K.A. Controlling inbreeding in modern breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84(E. Suppl.):E177-E184.
32. Wray N.R., Goddard M.E. Increasing long-term response to selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1994, 26:431-451.
33. Wray N.R., Thompson R. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genet. Res. 1990, 55:41-54.