Designing dairy cattle breeding schemes under genomic selection: A review of international research

Animal Production Science

Volumn 52, Issue 2-3, 2012, Pages 107-114

  Pryce, J E ^a   Daetwyler, H D ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY; CATTLE; DESIGN; GENOME; GENOMICS; INBREEDING; LIVESTOCK FARMING; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESEARCH WORK; SELECTIVE BREEDING; SEXUAL MATURITY;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 84858132535     PISSN: 18360939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AN11098     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Boichard D, Ducrocq V, Fritz S, Colleau JJ (2010) Where is dairy breeding going? A vision of the future. Interbull Bulletin 41, 63-68.
2. Browning BL, Browning SR (2009) A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated Individuals. American Journal of Human Genetics 84, 210-223. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005
3. Buch LH (2011) Genetic improvement of functional traits in dairy cattle breeding schemes with genomic selection. PhD Thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark.
4. Buch LH, Sørensen AC, Lassen J, Berg P, Eriksson JÅ, Jakobsen JH, Sørensen MK (2011) Hygiene-related and feed-related hoof diseases show different patterns of genetic correlations to clinical mastitis and female fertility. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1540-1551. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3137
5. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA (2007) Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 369-376. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x (Pubitemid 350231129)
6. Daetwyler HD, Wiggans GR, Hayes BJ, Woolliams JA, Goddard ME (2011) Imputation of missing genotypes from sparse to high density using long-range phasing.Genetics189, 317-327. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128082
7. de Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME (2008) Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179, 1503-1512. doi:10.1534/genetics.107. 084301
8. de Roos APW, Schrooten C, Veerkamp RF, van Arendonk JAM (2011) Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1559-1567. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3354
9. Dekkers JCM (2007) Prediction of response from marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 331-341. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007. 00701.x (Pubitemid 350231125)
10. Druet T, Georges M (2010) A hidden Markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Genetics 184, 789-798. doi:10.1534/genetics.109. 108431
11. Grundy B, Villanueva B, WoolliamsJA (1998) Dynamicselectionprocedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genetical Research 72, 159-168. doi:10.1017/S0016672 398003474 (Pubitemid 28563163)
12. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome assisted breeding values. Genetics 177, 2389-2397. (Pubitemid 350277013)
13. Harris BL, Johnson DL, Spelman RJ (2008) Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. In 'Proceedings of the 36th ICAR session', Niagara Falls, NY. (Ed. JD Sattler) pp. 325-330. (ICAR, Via G. Tomassetti 3, 1/A, 00161 Rome)
14. Hickey J, Kinghorn B, Tier B, Wilson J, Dunstan N, van der Werf J (2011) A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 43, 12. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-43-12
15. König S, Swalve HH (2009) Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5292-5303. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2232
16. König S, Simianer H, Willam A (2009) Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 382-391.
17. Lillehammer M, Meuwissen THE, Sonesson AK (2011) A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 493-500. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3518
18. Lund MS, de Roos APW, de Vries AG, Druet T, Ducrocq V, Fritz S, Guillame F, Guldbrandsten B, Liu Z, Reents R, Schrooten C, Seefried M, Su G (2010) Improving genomic prediction by Eurogenomics collaboration. In '10th world conference of genetics applied to livestock production', Leipzig, Germany. (German Society for Animal Science) p. 880. CD-ROM Communication paper.
19. Mc Hugh N, Meuwissen THE, Cromie AR, Sonesson AK (2011) Use of female information in dairy cattle breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4109-4118. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-4016
20. Meuwissen THE (1997) Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75, 934-940. (Pubitemid 127441682)
21. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829. (Pubitemid 32298846)
22. Nicholas FW, Smith C (1983) Increased rates of genetic change in dairy-cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Animal Production 36, 341-353. doi:10.1017/S0003356100010382
23. Pedersen LD, Sørensen AC, Berg P (2009a) Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2214-2223. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1616
24. Pedersen LD, Sørensen AC, Henryon M, Ansari-Mahyari S, Berg P (2009b) ADAM: a computer program to simulate selective breeding schemes for animals. Livestock Science 121, 343-344. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008. 06.028
25. Pedersen LD, Sørensen AC, Berg P (2010a) Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 127, 189-198. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388. 2009.00834.x
26. Pedersen LD, Sorensen MK, Berg P, Andersen JV, Sorensen AC (2010b) Using sexed semen has limited effect on genetic gain in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using genomic selection. In '10th world conference of genetics applied to livestock production', Leipzig, Germany. (German Society for Animal Science) p. 714. CD-ROM Communication.
27. Pryce JE, Goddard ME, Raadsma HW, Hayes BJ (2010) Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5455-5466. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3256
28. Pryce JE, Arias J, Bowman PJ, Macdonald KA, Waghorn GC, Wales WJ, Williams YL, Spelman RJ, Hayes BJ (2011a) Accuracy of genomic selection for residual feed intake and 250-day liveweight in dairy heifers using high-density (630k) SNP. Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 19, 367-370.
29. Pryce JE, Gredler B, Bolormaa S, Bowman PJ, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, Emmerling R, Sölkner J, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ (2011b) Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2625-2630. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3719
30. Robertson A, Rendel JM (1950) The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle. Journal of Genetics 50, 21-31. doi:10.1007/BF02986791
31. Schaeffer LR (2006) Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 123, 218-223. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x (Pubitemid 44049951)
32. Sonesson A, Meuwissen T (2009) Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 41, 37. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-37
33. Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen THE (2010) Maximising genetic gain whilst controlling rates of genomic inbreeding using genomic optimum contribution selection. In 'World congress of genetics applied to livestock production', Leipzig, Germany. (German Society for Animal Science) p. 892. CD-ROM Communication.
34. Sorensen AC, Sorensen MK (2009) Inbreeding rates in breeding programs with different strategies for using genomic selection. Interbull Bulletin 40, 94-97.
35. Soyeurt H, Dehareng F, Gengler N, McParland S, Wall E, Berry DP, Coffey M, Dardenne P (2011) Mid-infrared prediction of bovine milk fatty acids across multiple breeds, production systems, and countries. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1657-1667. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3408
36. VanRaden P, Sullivan P (2010) International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 42, 7. doi:10.1186/1297-9686- 42-7
37. VanRaden PM, O'Connell JR, Wiggans GR, Weigel KA (2011) Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 43, 10. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-43-10
38. Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA (2000) Optimal mass selection policies for schemes with overlapping generations and restricted inbreeding. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 32, 339-355. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-32-4-339
39. Winkelman AM, Spelman RJ (2010) Response using genome-wide selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. In 'World congress for genetics applied to livestock production', Leipzig, Germany. (German Society for Animal Science) p. 0290. CD-ROM Communication 714.
40. Woolliams JA, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B (2002) Strategic optimisation of short-and long-term gain and inbreedinginMAS and non-MAS schemes. In '7th world congress of genetics applied to livestock production', Montpellier, France. CD-ROM Communication no. 23-02.
41. Wray NR, Goddard ME (1994) Increasing long-term response to selection. Genetics, Selection, Evolution.26, 431-451. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-26-5-431 (Pubitemid 2144782)