Where did you serve? veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 267-288

  Gade, Daniel M ^a   Wilkins, Vicky M ^b  

^a UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875695314     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mus030     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ABT Associates. 2007. 2007 Veterans employability research survey final report. http://www.va.gov/VETDATA/docs/SurveysAndStudies/VERS-FINAL-REPORT-2-8- 08.pdf (accessed August 23, 2012).
2. Allen, H. A., and Cohen, M. S. 1980. Client preference for a disabled counselor. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 23:165-68.
3. Brewer, M. B. 2001. The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology 22:115-25.
4. Close, Billy R., Patrick Mason, Vicky M. Wilkins, and Brian N. Williams. 2009. Searching less and finding more: How bureaucratic representation leads to efficient policing. Paper presented at the 10th Public Management Research Conference, Columbus, OH, October 1-3, 2009.
5. Congressional Research Service. 2008. Veterans' benefits: The vocational rehabilitation and employment program. CRS Report # RL34627.
6. Culbreth, J. R. 2000. Substance abuse counselors with and without a personal history of chemical dependency. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 18:67-82.
7. Dolan, J. 2000. The senior executive service: Gender, attitudes, and representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:513.
8. 2002. Representative bureaucracy in the federal executive: Gender and spending priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12:353.
9. Gade, D. M., and J. B. Wenger. 2011. Combat exposure and mental health: The long-term effects among US Vietnam and Gulf War veterans. Health Economics 20:401-16.
10. Gargan, John J. 1999. Handbook of state government administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.
11. Gay, Claudine. 2002. Spiral of trust? The effect of descriptive representation on the relationship between citizens and the government. American Journal of Political Science 46:707-32.
12. Government Accountability Office. 2004. VA vocational rehabilitation and employment program: GAO comments on key task force findings and recommendations. GAO Report 04-852, June.
13. 2005. Vocational rehabilitation: VA has opportunities to improve services, but faces significant challenges. GAO Report 05-572T, April.
14. 2007. Disabled veterans employment: Additional planning, monitoring, and data collection efforts would improve assistance. GAO Report 07-1020, September.
15. 2009. VA vocational rehabilitation and employment: Better incentives, workforce planning, and performance reporting could improve program. GAO Report 09-34, January.
16. Harada, N. D., J. A. Damron-Rodriguez, V. M. Villa, D. L. Washington, S. Dhanani, H. Shon, M. Chattopadhyay, et al. 2002. Veteran identity and race/ethnicity: Influences on VA outpatient care utilization. Medical Care 40:117-28.
17. Hindera, J. 1993. Representative bureaucracy: Imprimis evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices. Social Science Quarterly 7:95-108.
18. Huddy, L. 2001. From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology 22:127-56.
19. Immergut, E. 1998. The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics and Society 26:5-34.
20. Katznelson, I. 1997. Structure and configuration in comparative politics. In Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure, ed. Lichbach and Zuckerman, 81-112. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
21. Keiser, L. R., V. M. Wilkins, K. J. Meier, and C. A. Holland. 2002. Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 96:553-64.
22. Kellough, J. E. 1990. Integration in the public workforce: Determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies. Public Administration Review 50:557-66.
23. Kingsley, B. A. 1944. Representative bureaucracy. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.
24. Lim, H. H. 2006. Representative bureaucracy: Rethinking substantive effects and active representation. Public Administration Review 66:193-204.
25. Mansbridge, Jane, and Katherine Tate. 1992. Race trumps gender: The Thomas nomination in the black community. Political Science & Politics 25:488-92.
26. Meier, K. J. 1993. Representative bureaucracy: A theoretical and empirical exposition. In Research in public administration, ed. J. L. Perry, 1-35. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. Meier, K. J., and J. Nicholson-Crotty. 2006. Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review 66:850-60.
28. Meier, K. J., and L. Nigro. 1976. Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences: A study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review 36:458-69.
29. Meier, K. J., and Stewart. 1992. Active representation in educational bureaucracies: Policy impacts. American Review of Public Administration 22:157-71.
30. Meier, K. J., R. D. Wrinkle, and J. L. Polinard. 1999. Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. Journal of Politics 61:1025-39.
31. Miller, K. L., S. M. Miller, and J. C. Stull. 2007. Predictors of counselor educators' cultural discriminatory behaviors. Journal of Counseling & Development 85:325-36.
32. Modell, J., and T. Haggerty. 1991. The social impact of war. Annual Review of Sociology 17:205-24.
33. Mosher, B. A. 1968. Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
34. Naff, K. C., and J. Crum. 2000. The president and representative bureaucracy: Rhetoric and reality. Public Administration Review 60:98-110.
35. Pedraza, F. I., and J. Krueger. 2012. Missing voices: War attitudes among military service-connected civilians. Armed Forces and Society 38:391-412.
36. Pitkin, H. 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
37. Pitts, J. A., and J. A. Lewis. 2011. Representation of lesbians and gay men in federal, state, and local bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21:159-80.
38. Priester, P. E., R. Azen, S. Speight, and E. M. Vera. 2007. The impact of counselor recovery status similarity on perceptions of attractiveness with members of alcoholics anonymous: An exception to the repulsion hypothesis. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 51:14.
39. Riccucci, and Saidel. 2001. The demographics of gubernatorial appointees: Toward an explanation of variation. Policy Studies Journal 29:11-22.
40. Rosenbloom, David. 1977. Federal equal employment opportunity: Politics and public personnel administration. New York: Praeger.
41. Selden, B. A. 1997. The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
42. Tajfel, J. A., and J. A. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations, ed. W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 33-47. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
43. Theobald, Nick A., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2008. Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19:409-26.
44. Thielemann, G. S., and J. Stewart Jr. 1996. A demand-side perspective on the importance of representative bureaucracy: AIDS, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. Public Administration Review 56:168-73.
45. US Department of Veterans Affairs. 2004. The Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Program for the 21st-century veteran. VA Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Task Force, Report to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
46. van Gool, Sebastiaan Maria. 2008. Untouchable bureaucracy: Unrepresentative bureaucracy in a North Indian state. PhD diss., Leiden Univ.
47. Wilkins, V. M., and L. R. Keiser. 2006. Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16:87.