Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis: A survey of prenatal genetic counselors' experiences and attitudes

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 371-377

  Mikhaelian, Marina ^a   Veach, Patricia Mccarthy ^a   Macfarlane, Ian ^a   Leroy, Bonnie S ^a   Bower, Matthew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHROMOSOMAL MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONNAIRE; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMANS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84875653819     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4071     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lu X, Shaw CA, Patel A, et al. Clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray analysis: summary of 2513 postnatal cases. PLoS ONE 2007;2:e327.
2. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW. Structural variation in the human genome. Nature reviews Genetics 2006;7:85-97.
3. Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:976-85.
4. Manning M, Hudgins L. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med 2010;12:742-5.
5. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010;86:749-64.
6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1161-3.
7. Canadian College of Medical Geneticists Cytogenetics Committee. CCMG Guidelines for Genomic Microarray Testing. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian College of Medical Geneticists; 2010. p. 1-10.
8. Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, et al. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:6-14.
9. Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2175-84.
10. Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, et al. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:29-39.
11. Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, et al. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 2005;42:121-8.
12. Deshpande M, Harper J, Holloway M, et al. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010;14:421-4.
13. Savage MS, Mourad MJ, Wapner RJ. Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23:103-8.
14. Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Rosenfeld JA, et al. Referral patterns for microarray testing in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:344-50.
15. Kowalcek I, Muhlhoff A, Bachmann S, et al. Depressive reactions and stress related to prenatal medicine procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:18-23.
16. Allen JS, Mulhauser LC. Genetic counseling after abnormal prenatal diagnosis: facilitating coping in families who continue their pregnancies. J Genet Couns 1995;4:251-65.
17. Hoskovec J, Mastrobattista JM, Johnston D, et al. Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing? Prenat Diagn 2008;28:135-40.
18. Lalatta F, Quagliarini D, Folliero E, et al. Triple X syndrome: characteristics of 42 Italian girls and parental emotional response to prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Pediatr 2010;169:1255-61.
19. Silver RK, Blum K, Geibel LJ, et al. Clinical implications of atypical chromosome abnormalities diagnosed prenatally. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:925-8.
20. Tseng JJ, Chou MM, Lo FC, et al. Detection of chromosome aberrations in the second trimester using genetic amniocentesis: experience during 1995-2004. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2006;45:39-41.
21. Abrams L, Cotter PD. Prenatal diagnosis of de novo X;autosome translocations. Clin Genet 2004;65:423-8.
22. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Saint Paul, MN: Sage Publications, Inc., 1990.
23. Peng CY, Harwell M, Liou SM, et al. Advances in missing data methods and implications for educational research. In Real Data Analysis, Sawilowsky SS, (ed.). Charlotte, NC: New Information Age Publishing, 2006; 31-78.
24. Breman A, Pursley AN, Hixson P, et al. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:351-61.
25. Faas BH, Feenstra I, Eggink AJ, et al. Non-targeted whole genome 250K SNP array analysis as replacement for karyotyping in fetuses with structural ultrasound anomalies: evaluation of a one-year experience. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:362-70.
26. Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, et al. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2012;119:614-25.
27. Lee S. Genetic Counseling Perspectives on Prenatal Array CGH Testing. Waltham, Massachusetts: Brandeis University; 2009.
28. McGillivray G, Rosenfeld JA, McKinlay Gardner RJ, et al. Genetic counselling and ethical issues with chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:389-95.
29. Wapner RJ, Driscoll DA, Simpson JL. Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:396-400.