Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 421-424

  Deshpande, Maitreyee ^a   Harper, Joyce ^a   Holloway, Melissa ^b   Palmer, Rodger ^b   Wang, Rubin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KARYOTYPING; MALE; MULTIPLEX LIGATION DEPENDENT PROBE AMPLIFICATION; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME; ANEUPLOIDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; MOSAICISM; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ANEUPLOIDY; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MOSAICISM; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 77954932491     PISSN: 19450265     EISSN: 19450257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0014     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Abruzzo MA, Hassold TJ (1995) Etiology of non disjunction in humans. Environ Mol Mutagen 26:38-47.
2. Ballif BC, Kashork CD, Saleki R, et al. (2006) Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn 26:333-339.
3. Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Haddad BR, Feinberg RF (1999) Cy-togenetic diagnosis of "normal 46,XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril 71:334-341.
4. Bruno DL, Burgess T, Ren H, et al. (2006) High-throughput analysis of chromosome abnormality in spontaneous miscarriage using an MLPA subtelomere assay with an ancillary FISH test for polyploidy. Am J Med Genet Part A 140A:2786-2793.
5. Diego-Alvarez D, de Alba MR, Cardero-Merlo R, et al. (2007) MLPA as a screening method of aneuploidy and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements in spontaneous miscarriages. Prenat Diagn 27:765-771.
6. Exalto N, Christiansen OB, Farquharson RG, Jauniaux E. (2007) Early pregnancy failure: a review. Eur Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2:171-179.
7. Hu Y, Chen X, Chen LL, et al. (2006) Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynecol Obstet 92:52-57.
8. Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, et al. (2000) Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 66:1516-1521.
9. Nikcevic AV, Tunkel SA, Kuczmierczyk AR, Nicolaides KH (1999) Investigation of the cause of miscarriage and its influence on women's psychological distress. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:808-813.
10. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, et al. (2006) Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444:444-454.
11. Rickman L, Fiegler H, Carter, Bobrow M (2005) Prenatal diagnosis by Array-CGH. Eur J Med Genet 48:232-1224