Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 114, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1161-1163

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME NUMBER; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONGENITAL DISORDER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KARYOTYPING; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; NOTE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; DNA MICROARRAY; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 73549121749     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33cad     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Vissers LE, Veltman JA, van Kessel AG, Brunner HG. Identification of disease genes by whole genome CGH arrays. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14(spec no. 2):R215-23.
2. de Vries BB, Pfundt R, Leisink M, Koolen DA, Vissers LE, Janssen IM, et al. Diagnostic genome profiling in mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 2005;77:606-616
3. Vissers LE, van Ravenswaaij CM, Admiraal R, Hurst JA, de Vries BB, Janssen IM, et al. Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nat Genet 2004;36:955-957 (Pubitemid 39167490)
4. Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Lese Martin C. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74:1168-1174 (Pubitemid 38669315)
5. Stankiewicz P, Beaudet AL. Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2007;17:182-192 (Pubitemid 46843553)
6. Sahoo T, Cheung SW, Ward P, Darilek S, Patel A, del Gaudio D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 2006;8:719-727
7. Mefford HC, Sharp AJ, Baker C, Itsara A, Jiang Z, Buysse K, et al. Recurrent rearrangements of chromosome lq21.1 and variable pediatric phenotypes. N Engl J Med 2008;359: 1685-1699
8. Slavotinek AM. Novel microdeletion syndromes detected by chromosome microarrays. Hum Genet 2008;124:1-17.
9. Koolen DA, Vissers LE, Pfundt R, de Leeuw N, Knight SJ, Regan R, et al. A new chromosome 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome associated with a common inversion polymorphism. Nat Genet 2006;38:999-1001.
10. Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, Jacquemont S, Joubert M, David A, et al. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 2005;42:121-128 (Pubitemid 40204365)
11. Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, Pursley AN, Kang SH, Simovich MJ, et al. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:29-39.