Retraction Note: Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging (2013) 29, (443-452) DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0095-4);Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 443-452

  Pelliccia, F ^a   Pasceri, V ^b   Evangelista, A ^a,c   Pergolini, A ^a,c   Barilla F ^a   Viceconte, N ^a   Tanzilli, G ^a   Schiariti, M ^a   Greco, C ^a,d   Gaudio, C ^a,d  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b SAN FILIPPO NERI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c Villa Sandra Hospital   (Italy)

^d Eleonora Lorillard Spencer Cenci Foundation   (Italy)

Author keywords

Angiography; Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Coronary vessels; Imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84875652528     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0400-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324-2336
2. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135-2144
3. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724-1732
4. Chow BJ, Freeman MR, Bowen JM et al (2011) Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med 171:1021-1029
5. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS et al (2006) Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1840-1845
6. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535-546
7. Hein PA, Romano VC, Lembcke A, May J, Rogalla P (2009) Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT. Eur Radiol 19:1148-1155
8. Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A et al (2011) Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology 261:779-786
9. Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M et al (2011) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:328-337
10. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500-507
11. Gaudio C, Evangelista A, Pasceri V et al (2011) Visualization of coronary arteries and coronary stents by low dose 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography in a patient with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 151:e6-e7
12. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298:317-323 (Pubitemid 47080486)
13. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138:40-44 (Pubitemid 36232093)
14. Engelken FJ, Lembcke A, Hamm B, Dewey M (2009) Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation. Acad Radiol 16:239-243
15. Dewey M (2008) Examination and reconstruction. In: Dewey M (ed) Coronary CT angiography. Springer, Heidelberg
16. Weigold WG, Abbara S, Achenbach S et al (2011) Standardized medical terminology for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:136-144
17. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5-40
18. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Laule M et al (2004) Multislice CT coronary angiography: evaluation of an automatic vessel detection tool. Rofo 176:478-483 (Pubitemid 38724239)
19. Waters D, Lespérance J, Craven TE, Hudon G, Gillam LD (1993) Advantages and limitations of serial coronary arteriography for the assessment of progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis: implications for clinical trials. Circulation 87(Suppl II):38-47
20. Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ et al (1985) Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 71:280-288 (Pubitemid 15157088)
21. Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K et al (2009) High-pitch electrocardiogram- triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest Radiol 44:728-733
22. Lobotessi H, Karoussou A, Neofotistou V, Louisi A, Tsapaki V (2001) Effective dose to a patient undergoing coronary angiography. Radiat Prot Dosim 94:173-176 (Pubitemid 32433157)
23. Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H et al (2011) A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 32:1316-1330
24. Rawles J, Bignall JC (1986) Regression analysis. Lancet 327:614-615
25. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
26. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908-1915
27. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120:867-875
28. Nasis A, Leung MC, Antonis PR et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography with 320-detector row computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 106:1429-1435
29. van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, Kroft LJ et al (2011) Performance and efficacy of 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain: results from a clinical registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:1-12
30. Zhang C, Zhang Z, Yan Z, Xu L, Yu W, Wang R (2011) 320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1059-1068
31. Vanhecke TE, Madder RD, Weber JE, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Chinnaiyan KM (2011) Development and validation of a predictive screening tool for uninterpretable coronary CT angiography results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:490-497
32. Pasricha SS, Nandurkar D, Seneviratne SK et al (2009) Image quality of coronary 320-MDCT in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 193:1514-1521
33. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2007) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1469-1475 (Pubitemid 47496246)