A spatial-temporal forensic analysis for inland-water ship collisions using AIS data

Safety Science

Volumn 57, Issue , 2013, Pages 187-202

  Wang, Yang ^a   Zhang, Jinfen ^a   Chen, Xianqiao ^a   Chu, Xiumin ^a   Yan, Xinping ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

AIS data; Collision accident; Dempster Shafer theory; Forensic analysis; Spatial temporal fusion

Indexed keywords

AIS DATA; COLLISION ACCIDENTS; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; FORENSIC ANALYSIS; SPATIAL TEMPORALS;

ACCIDENTS; FUZZY SETS; QUALITY CONTROL; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

SHIPS;

ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM; CALCULATION; DATA MINING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DEMPSTER SHAFER THEORY; FORENSIC SCIENCE; FUZZY LOGIC; FUZZY SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHIP COLLISION; SIMULATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84875650708     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Awasthi A., Chauhan S.S. Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environmental Modeling & Software 2011, 26:787-796.
2. Baraldi P., Librizzi M., Zio E., Podofillini L., Dang V.N. Two techniques of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of fuzzy expert systems. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 36(10):12461-12471.
3. Beynon M., Cosker D., Marshall D. An expert system for multi-criteria decision making using Dempster Shafer theory. Expert Systems with Applications 2001, 20(4):357-367.
4. Celik M., Lavasani S.M., Wang J. A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation. Safety Science 2010, 48:18-27.
5. Dempster A. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. The Annals of Statistics 1967, 28:325-339.
6. Dempster A.P., Chiu W.F. Dempster-Shafer models for object recognition and classification. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2006, 21:283-297.
7. Duru O., Bulut E., Yoshida S. Regime switching fuzzy AHP model for choice-varying priorities problem and expert consistency prioritization: a cubic fuzzy-priority matrix design. Expert Systems with Applications 2012, 39(5):4954-4964.
8. Fowler T.G., Sørgård E. Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis 2000, 20(2):225-244.
9. Fujii Y., Shiobara R. The analysis of traffic accidents. Journal of Navigation 1971, 24:534-543.
10. Fujii Y., Tanaka K. Traffic capacity. Journal of Navigation 1971, 24(4):543-552.
11. Goerlandt F., Kujala P. Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2011, 96:91-107.
12. Goodwin E.M. A statistical study of ship domains. Journal of Navigation 1975, 28(3):328-344.
13. Harati-Mokhtari A., Wall A., Brooks P., et al. Automatic Identification System (AIS): data reliability and human error implications. The Journal of Navigation 2007, 60:373-389.
14. Hassel M., Asbjørnslett B.E., Hole L.P. Underreporting of maritime accidents to vessel accident databases. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011, 43:2053-2063.
15. Hollnagel, E., 2002. Understanding accidents - from root causes to performance variability. In: IEEE 7 Human Factors Meeting Scottsdale Arizona.
16. Hsu W.K.K. Ports' service attributes for ship navigation safety. Safety Science 2012, 50(2):244-252.
17. IALA (International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities), 2004. The Automatic Identification (AIS) Volume 1, Part I, Operational Issues, Edition 1.3.
18. IMO (International Maritime Organization), 2008. IMO's Contribution to Sustainable Maritime Development. . http://www.imo.org/OurWork/TechnicalCooperation/Documents/Brochure/English.pdf.
19. Jiang Q.M., Chen C.H. A multi-dimensional fuzzy decision support strategy. Decision Support Systems 2005, 38(4):591-598.
20. Jousselme A.L., Grenier D., Bossé é. A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Information Fusion 2001, 2:91-101.
21. Jousselme A.L., Liu C., Grenier D., Bossé é. Measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A:Systems and Humans 2006, 36(5):890-903.
22. Knudsen O.F., Hassler B. IMO legislation and its implementation: accident risk, vessel deficiencies and national administrative practices. Marine Policy 2011, 35(2):201-207.
23. Kokotos D., Linardatos D. An application of Data mining tools for the study of shipping safety in restricted waters. Safety Science 2011, 49(2):192-197.
24. Kong, X.Y., Guo, B.M., Liu, Z.Q., 2005. The Fundamentals of Geodesy. Wuhan University Press (in Chinese).
25. Luo F.Y., Wu T.M., Su D.T. An analytical algorithm for collision information among multiple vessels. Journal of Technology 2007, 22(3):243-252. (in Chinese).
26. MacDuff T. The probability of vessel collisions. Ocean Industry 1974, 9(9):144-148.
27. Martins M.R., Maturana M.C. Human error contribution in collision and grounding of oil tankers. Risk Analysis 2010, 30(4):674-698.
28. Mitra S., Pal S.K. Fuzzy sets in pattern recognition and machine intelligence. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2005, 156(3):381-386.
29. Montewka J., Hinz T., Kujala P., Matusiak J. Probability modeling of vessel collisions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2010, 95:573-589.
30. Mullai A., Paulsson U. A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011, 43:1590-1603.
31. Perera L.P., Carvalho J.P., Soares C.G. Fuzzy logic based decision making system for collision avoidance of ocean navigation under critical collision conditions. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 2011, 16:84-99.
32. Shafer, G., 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
33. Smets P., Kennes R. The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence 1994, 66:191-234.
34. Śmierzchalski R., Michalewicz Z. Modeling of ship trajectory in collision situations by an evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation 2000, 4(3):227-241.
35. Soares C.G., Teixeira A.P. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2001, 74:299-309.
36. Statheros T., Howells G., McDonald-Maier K. Autonomous ship collision avoidance navigation concepts, technologies and techniques. Journal of Navigation 2008, 61:129-142.
37. Trucco P., Cagno E., Ruggeri F., Grande O. A Bayesian Belief Network modeling of organizational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2008, 93:823-834.
38. Tsou M.C., Hsueh C.K. The study of ship collision avoidance route planning by ant colony algorithm. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 2010, 18(5):746-756.
39. Tsou M.C., Kao S.L., Su C.M. Decision support from genetic algorithms for ship collision avoidance route planning and alerts. Journal of Navigation 2010, 63(1):167-182.
40. Tzannatos E., Kokotos D. Analysis of accidents in Greek shipping during the pre-and post-ISM period. Marine Policy 2009, 33(4):679-684.
41. Wang G., Spencer J., Chen Y. Assessment of a ship's performance in accidents. Marine Structures 2002, 15:313-333.
42. Yip T.L. Port traffic risks - a study of accidents in Hong Kong waters. Transportation Research Part E 2008, 44:921-931.
43. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965, 8:338-353.
44. Zhang J.F., Yan X.P., Chen X.Q., Sang L.Z. A novel approach for assistance with anti-collision decision making based on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea. Journal of Engineering for Maritime Environment 2012, 226(3):250-259.