Differences in dichogamy and herkogamy contribute to higher selfing in contrasting environments in the annual Blackstonia perfoliata (Gentianaceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 651-661

  Brys, Rein ^a,b   Geens, Bram ^a   Beeckman, Tom ^c,d   Jacquemyn, Hans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Autogamy; Blackstonia perfoliata; competing selfing; delayed selfing; dichogamy; Gentianaceae; herkogamy; pollen limitation; pollen quality; reproductive assurance

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL PLANT; AUTOGAMY; COLONIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLORA; MORPHOLOGY; OUTCROSSING; REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL; SEED PRODUCTION; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; ECOSYSTEM; FLOWER; GENTIANACEAE; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SELF FERTILIZATION;

ANIMALS; BELGIUM; ECOSYSTEM; FLOWERS; GENTIANACEAE; INSECTS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SEEDS; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

BLACKSTONIA PERFOLIATA; GENTIANACEAE;

EID: 84875636034     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct031     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aizen MA, Harder LD. 2007. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 88: 271-281.
2. Arathi HS, Rasch A, Cox C, Kelly JK. 2002. Autogamy and floral longevity in Mimulus guttatus. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 567-573.
3. Armbruster WS, Mulder CPH, Baldwin BG, Kalisz S, Wessa B, Nute H. 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in Tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae SL). American Journal of Botany 89: 37-49.
4. Baker HG. 1955. Self compatibility and establishment after long distance dispersal. Evolution 9: 347-349.
5. Barrett SCH. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358: 991-1004.
6. Bertin RI, Newman CM. 1993. Dichogamy in Angiosperms. Botanical Review 59: 112-152.
7. Bodbyl-Roels SA, Kelly JK. 2011. Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 65: 2541-2552.
8. Brys R, Jacquemyn H. 2011. Variation in the functioning of autonomous selfpollination, pollinator services and floral traits in three Centaurium species. Annals of Botany 107: 917-925.
9. Brys R, Jacquemyn H. 2012. Effects of human-mediated pollinator impoverishment on floral traits and mating patterns in a short-lived herb: an experimental approach. Functional Ecology 26: 189-197.
10. Brys R, De Crop E, Hoffmann M, Jacquemyn H. 2011. The importance of autonomous selfing is inversely related to population size and pollinator availability in a monocarpic plant. American Journal of Botany 98: 1834-1840.
11. Charlesworth D. 2003. Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358: 1051-1070.
12. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237-268.
13. Cheptou PO. 2012. Clarifying Baker's law. Annals of Botany 109: 633-641.
14. Cruden RW, Lyon DL. 1989. Facultative xenogamy: examination of a mixed mating system. In: Bock J, Linhart YB. eds. Evolutionary ecology of plants. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 171-207.
15. Darwin C. 1876. The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. London: Murray.
16. Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
17. Eckert CG, Kalisz S, Geber MA, et al. 2010. Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 35-43.
18. Elle E, Gillespie S, Guindre-Parker S, Parachnowitsch AL. 2010. Variation in the timing of autonomous selfing among populations that differ in flower size, time to reproductive maturity, and climate. American Journal of Botany 97: 1894-1902.
19. Ennos RA. 1981. Quantitative studies of the mating system in two sympatric species of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). Genetica 57: 93-98.
20. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 47-79.
21. Griffin SR, Mavraganis K, Eckert CG. 2000. Experimental analysis of protogyny in Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 1246-1256.
22. Herlihy CR, Eckert CG. 2007. Evolutionary analysis of a key floral trait in Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae): genetic variation in herkogamy and its effect on the mating system. Evolution 61: 1661-1674.
23. Hood GM. 2010. PopTools version 3.2.5. URL http://www.poptools.org
24. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
25. Igic B, Lande R, Kohn Jr. 2008. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 93-104.
26. Jacquemyn H, De Meester L, Jongejans E, Honnay O. 2012. Evolutionary changes in plant reproductive traits following habitat fragmentation and their consequences for population fitness. Journal of Ecology 100: 76-87.
27. Jain SK. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 7: 469-495.
28. Kalisz S, Vogler D, Fails B, et al. 1999. The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1239-1247.
29. Kalisz S, Randle A, Chaiffetz D, Faigeles M, Butera A, Beight C. 2012. Dichogamy correlates with outcrossing rate and defines the selfing syndrome in the mixed-mating genus Collinsia. Annals of Botany 109: 571-582.
30. Karron JD, Ivey CT, Mitchell RT, Whitehead MR, Peakall R, Case AL. 2012. New perspectives on the evolution of plant mating systems. Annals of Botany 109: 493-503.
31. Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
32. Levin AL. 2010. Environment-enhanced self-fertilization: implications for niche shifts in adjacent populations. Journal of Ecology 98: 1276-1283.
33. Lloyd DG. 1987. Allocation to pollen, seeds and pollination mechanisms in self-fertilizing plants. Functional Ecology 1: 83-89.
34. Lloyd DG. 1992. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 370-380.
35. Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ. 1992. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 358-369.
36. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24: 135-162.
37. Mallick SA. 2001. Facultative dichogamy and reproductive assurance in partially protandrous plants. Oikos 95: 533-536.
38. Moeller DA, Geber MA. 2005. Ecological context of the evolution of selfpollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59: 786-799.
39. Moeller DA. 2006. Geographic structure of pollinator communities, reproductive assurance, and the evolution of self-pollination. Ecology 87: 1510-1522.
40. Morgan MT, Wilson GM. 2005. Self-fertilization and the escape from pollen limitation in variable pollination environments. Evolution 59: 1143-1148.
41. Morgan MT, Schoen DJ, Bataillon TM. 1997. The evolution of selffertilization in perennials. American Naturalist 150: 618-638.
42. Rasband WS. 2011. ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997-2011.
43. Rick CM, Fobes JF, Holle M. 1977. Genetic variation in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems. Plant Systematics and Evolution 127: 139-170.
44. Ritland C, Ritland K. 1989. Variation in sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 76: 1731-1739.
45. Schoen DJ. 1982. The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36: 352-360.
46. Schoen DJ, Ashman TL. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity-resource- allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49: 131-139.
47. Sicard A, Lenhard M. 2011. The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Annals of Botany 107: 1433-1443.
48. Takebayashi N, Delph LF. 2000. An association between a floral trait and inbreeding depression. Evolution 54: 840-846.
49. Tilton VR. 1980. Hypostase development in Ornithogalum caudatum (Liliaceae) and notes on other types of modifications in the chalaza of angiosperm ovules. Canadian Journal of Botany 58: 2059-2066.
50. Tutin TG. 1972. Gentianaceae. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, et al. eds. Flora Europaea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53-54.
51. Vallejo-Marin M, Barrett SCH. 2009. Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of self-fertilization. Annals of Botany 103: 951-962.
52. Van der Sluis WG. 1985. Chemotaxonomical investigations of the genera Blackstonia and Centaurium (Gentianaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 149: 253-286.
53. Van LanduytW, Hoste I, Vanhecke L, Van den Bremt P, VercruysseW, De Beer D. 2006. Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels gewest. Nationale Plantentuin & Instituut voor Natuur-en Bosonderzoek i.s.m. FloWer vzw.
54. Vaughton G, Ramsey M. 2010. Floral emasculation reveals pollen quality limitation of seed output in Bulbine bulbosa (Asphodelaceae). American Journal of Botany 97: 174-178.
55. Waller DM. 1993. The statics and dynamics of mating system evolution. In: Thornhill W. ed. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 97-117.
56. Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and breeding rate. Genetical Research 74: 165-178.
57. Winn AA, Elle E, Kalisz S, et al. 2011. Insight into the cause of mixed mating in plants from the magnitude and timing of expression of inbreeding depression. Evolution 65: 3639-3644.
58. Wyatt R. 1986. Ecology and evolution of self-pollination in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Ecology 74: 403-418.