An association between a floral trait and inbreeding depression

Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 840-846

  Takebayashi, Naoki ^a   Delph, Lynda F ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic association; Gilia; Herkogamy; Inbreeding depression; Mating system evolution

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC TRAIT; HERKOGAMY; INBREEDING; MATING SYSTEM; SELFING;

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

CALIFORNIA; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS; REPRODUCTION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; GILIA; GILIA ACHILLEIFOLIA;

EID: 0033911409     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00084.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ågren, J., and D. W. Schemske. 1993. Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. seminovata. Evolution 47:125-135.
2. Baker, H. G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after "long distance" dispersal. Evolution 9:347-349.
3. Barrett, S. C. H., and D. Charlesworth. 1991. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352: 522-524.
4. Bennett, J. H., and F. E. Binet. 1956. Association between Mendelian factors with mixed selfing and random mating. Heredity 10:51-55.
5. Bishop, Y. M. M., S. E. Fienberg, and P. W. Holland. 1975. Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Carr, D. E., C. B. Fenster, and M. R. Dudash. 1997. The relationship between mating-system characters and inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51:363-372.
7. Chang, S.-M., and M. D. Rausher. 1999. The role of inbreeding depression in maintaining the mixed mating system of the common morning glory, Ipomoea Purpurea. Evolution 53: 1366-1376.
8. Charlesworth, B., M. T. Morgan, and D. Charlesworth. 1991. Multilocus models of inbreeding depression with synergistic selection and partial self-fertilization. Genet. Res. 57:177-194.
9. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
10. Charlesworth, D., M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44:1469-1489.
11. _. 1992. The effect of linkage and population size on inbreed-ing depression due to mutational load. Genet. Res. 59:49-61.
12. Deng, H.-W., and M. Lynch. 1997. Inbreeding depression and inferred deleterious-mutation parameters in Daphnia. Genetics 147:147-155.
13. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11:53-63.
14. Fu, Y. B., and K. Ritland. 1994. Marker-based inferences about fecundity genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Genome 37:1005-1010.
15. Haldane, J. B. S. 1949. The association of characters as a result of inbreeding and linkage. Ann. Eugen. 15:15-23.
16. Holsinger, K. E. 1988. Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution 42: 1235-1244.
17. Holsinger, K. E., M. W. Feldman, and F. B. Christiansen. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model. Am. Nat. 124:446-453.
18. Johnston, M. O., and D. J. Schoen. 1995. Mutation rates and dominance levels of genes affecting total fitness in two angiosperm species. Science 267:226-229.
19. Karron, J. D., R. T. Jackson, N. N. Thumser, and S. L. Schlicht. 1997. Outcrossing rates of individual Mimulus ringens genets are correlated with anther-stigma separation. Heredity 79: 365-370.
20. Kimura, M. 1959. Conflict between self-fertilization and outbreeding in plants. Annu. Rep. Natl. Inst. Genet. Japan. 9:87-88.
21. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
22. Lande, R., D. W. Schemske, and S. T. Schultz. 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48:965-978.
23. Latta, R., and K. Ritland. 1993. The relationship between inbreeding depression and prior inbreeding among populations of four Mimulus taxa. Evolution 48:806-817.
24. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
25. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113:67-79.
26. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
27. Motten, A. F., and J. Antonovics. 1992. Determinants of outcrossing rate in a predominantly self-fertilizing weed, Datura stramonium (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79:419-427.
28. Mutikainen, P., and L. F. Delph. 1998. Inbreeding depression in a gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 52:1572-1582.
29. Nagylaki, T. 1976. A model for the evolution of self-fertilization and vegetative reproduction. J. Theor. Biol. 58:55-58.
30. Rick, C. M., M. Holle, and R. W. Thorp. 1978. Rates of cross-pollination in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: impact of genetic variation in floral characters. Plant Syst. Evol. 129:31-44.
31. Schoen, D. J. 1982. The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36:352-360.
32. _. 1983. Relative fitnesses of selfed and outcrossed progeny in Gilia achilleifolia (Polemoniaceae). Evolution 37:292-301.
33. Schultz, S. T., and J. H. Willis. 1995. Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics 141:1209-1223.
34. Self, S. G., and K. Y. Liang. 1987. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82:605-610.
35. Thomson, J. D., and D. A. Stratton. 1985. Floral morphology and cross-pollination in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Am. J. Bot. 72:433-437.
36. Uyenoyama, M. K., and D. M. Waller. 1991a. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40:14-46.
37. _. 1991b. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. II. Symmetric overdominance in viability. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40:47-77.
38. _. 1991c. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. III. Homozygous lethal mutations at multiple loci. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40:173-210.
39. Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham. 1973. Mixed self and random mating at two loci. Genet. Res. 21:247-262.
40. Wells, H. 1979. Self-fertilization: advantageous or deleterious? Evolution 33:252-255.
41. Welsh, A. H., A. T. Peterson, and S. A. Altmann. 1988. The fallacy of averages. Am. Nat. 132:277-288.
42. Wolfe, L. M. 1993. Inbreeding depression in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum: the role of maternal effects, crowding, and parental mating history. Evolution 47:374-386.