Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality

Information and Organization

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 59-76

  Leonardi, Paul M ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875635124     PISSN: 14717727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ackroyd S., Fleetwood S. Realism in contemporary organisation and management studies. Realist perspective on management and organisations 2000, 3-25. Routledge, London. S. Ackroyd, S. Fleetwood (Eds.).
2. Aldrich H.E. Technology and organizational structure: A reexamination of the findings of the aston group. Administrative Science Quarterly 1972, 17(1):26-43.
3. Archer M. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach 1995, Cambridge university Press, Cambridge, (Vol.).
4. Archer M. For structure: Its reality, properties, and powers: A reply to Anthony King. The Sociological Review 2000, 48:464-472.
5. Baptista J. Institutionalisation as a process of interplay between technology and its organisational context of use. Journal of Information Technology 2009, 24:305-319.
6. Barad K. Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science 1996, 161-194. Kluwer Press, Dordrecht, Holland. L. Hankinson, J. Nelson (Eds.).
7. Barad K. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 2003, 28(3):801-831.
8. Barad K. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning 2007, Duke University Press, Durham.
9. Barley S.R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of ct scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986, 31(1):78-108.
10. Barley S.R. Technology, power, and the social organization of work: Towards a pragmatic theory of skilling and deskilling. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 1988, 6:33-80.
11. Bhaskar R. The possibility of naturalism 1979, Harvester, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
12. Blau P.M., Falbe C.M., McKinley W., Tracy P.K. Technology and organization in manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly 1976, 21(1):20-40.
13. Blumer H. The methodological position of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method 1969, 1-60. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. H. Blumer (Ed.).
14. Bohr N. The philosophical writings of niels bohr, vol. Iii: Essays 1958-1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge 1963, Ox Bow, Woodbridge, CT.
15. Boudreau M.-C., Robey D. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science 2005, 16(1):3-18.
16. Buckley W. Sociology and modern systems theory 1967, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (Vol.).
17. Child J. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 1972, 6(1-22).
18. Cooren F. Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism 2010, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
19. Davidson E. Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly 2002, 26(4):329-358.
20. Davis L.E., Taylor J.C. Technology, organization and job structure. Handbook of work, organization, and society 1976, 379-419. Rand-McNally, Stokie, IL. R. Dubin (Ed.).
21. DeSanctis G., Poole M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 1994, 5(2):121-147.
22. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:147-160.
23. Faraj S., Azad B. The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world 2012, 237-258. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, J. Kallinikos (Eds.).
24. Faulkner P., Runde J. On sociomateriality. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world 2012, 49-66. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, J. Kallinikos (Eds.).
25. Faulkner P., Runde J. Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Quarterly 2013, 37(1).
26. Fleetwood S. Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization Studies 2005, 12:197-222.
27. Giddens A. Central problems in social theory 1979, University of California Press, Berkeley.
28. Giddens A. The constitution of society 1984, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
29. Gregor S. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly 2006, 30(3):611-642.
30. Jackson M.H., Poole M.S., Kuhn T. The social construction of technology in studies of the workplace. Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTS 2002, 236-253. Sage, London. L.A. Lievrouw, S. Livingstone (Eds.).
31. Kallinikos J. Farewell to constructivism: Technology and context-embedded action. The social study of information and communication technology: Innovation, actors and contexts 2004, 140-161. Oxford University Press, Oxford. C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra, F. Land (Eds.).
32. Kallinikos J. Form, function, and matter: Crossing the border of materiality. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world 2012, 67-87. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, J. Kallinikos (Eds.).
33. Latour B. Science in action 1987, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Latour B. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change 1992, 225-258. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W.E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.).
35. Latour B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Leonardi P.M. Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organization Science 2007, 18(5):813-831.
37. Leonardi P.M. Crossing the implementation line: The mutual constitution of technology and organizing across development and use activities. Communication Theory 2009, 19:278-310.
38. Leonardi P.M. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly 2011, 35(1):147-167.
39. Leonardi P.M. Car crashes without cars: Lessons about simulation technology and organizational change from automotive design 2012, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
40. Leonardi P.M. Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them?. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world 2012, 25-48. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, J. Kallinikos (Eds.).
41. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, J. Kallinikos (Eds.).
42. Majchrzak A., Malhotra A. Virtual workspace technology use and knowledge-sharing effectiveness in distributed teams: The influence of team's transactive memory. Working paper 2004, University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles, CA.
43. Maxwell J.A. A realist approach for qualitative research 2012, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, (Vol.).
44. Mutch A. Actors and networks or agents and structures: Towards a realist view of information systems. Organization 2002, 9(3):477-496.
45. Mutch A. Technology, organization, and structure - A morphogenetic approach. Organization Science 2010, 21(2):507-520.
46. Mutch, A. (this issue). Sociomateriality - A wrong turning? Information and Organization.
47. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. An evolutionary theory of economic change 1982, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Orlikowski W.J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 1992, 3(3):398-427.
49. Orlikowski W.J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 2000, 11(4):404-428.
50. Orlikowski W.J. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies 2007, 28(9):1435-1448.
51. Orlikowski W.J. The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, 34:125-141.
52. Orlikowski W.J., Scott S.V. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals 2008, 2(1):433-474.
53. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective 1978, Harper & Row, New York.
54. Phillips D.C. Philosophy, science, and social inquiry 1987, Pergamon, Oxford.
55. Poole M.S., DeSanctis G. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. Organizations and communication technology 1990, 173-193. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. J. Fulk, C. Steinfield (Eds.).
56. Poole M.S., DeSanctis G. Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research 1992, 19(1):5-49.
57. Putnam H. The threefold cord: Mind, body, and world 1999, Vol. 5. Columbia University Press, New York.
58. Reed M. Is communication constitutive of organization?. Management Communication Quarterly 2010, 24:151-157.
59. Robey D., Raymond B., Anderson C. Theorizing information technology as a material artifact in information systems research. Materiality and organizing 2012, 217-236. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi, J. Kallinikos (Eds.).
60. Schultze U., Orlikowski W.J. A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of internet-based self-serve technologies. [Article]. Information Systems Research 2004, 15(1):87-106.
61. Scott, W. R. (1990). Technology and structure: An organizational-level perspective. In P. S. Goodman, L. S. Sproull & Associates (Eds.), Technology and organizations (pp. 109-143). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Smith M.R. Technological determinism in American culture. Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism 1994, 1-35. The MIT Press, Cambridge. M.R. Smith, L. Marx (Eds.).
63. Straub D.W. Does MIS have native theories?. MIS Quarterly 2012, 36(2):iii-xii.
64. Strong D.M., Volkoff O. Understanding organization-enterprise systems fit: A path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Quarterly 2010, 34(4):731-756.
65. Sutton R.I. Sociomateriality: More academic jargon monoxide [web log comment]. Retrieved from. http://bobsutton.Typepad.Com/my_weblog/2010/10/sociomateriality-more-academic-jargon-monoxide.Html.
66. Svahn F., Henfridsson O., Yoo Y. A threesome dance of agency: Mangling the sociomateriality of technological regimes in digital innovation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems 2009, (Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/2005).
67. Taylor J.R. Organizing from the bottom up? Reflections on the constitution of organization in communication. Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication 2009, 153-186. Routledge, New York. L.L. Putnam, A.M. Nicotera (Eds.).
68. Taylor J.R., Van Every E.J. The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface 2000, Taylor & Francis, New York.
69. Thompson J.D., Bates F.L. Technology, organization, and administration. Administrative Science Quarterly 1957, 2(3):325-343.
70. Vaast E., Walsham G. Representations and actions: The transformation of work practices with it use. Information and Organization 2005, 15:65-89.
71. Van Maanen J. Tales of the field: On writing ethnography 1988, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
72. Volkoff O., Strong D.M. Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing it-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly 2013, 37(1).
73. Volkoff O., Strong D.M., Elmes M.B. Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organization Science 2007, 18(5):832-848. 10.1287/orsc.1070.0288.
74. Wagner E.L., Newell S., Piccolo G. Understanding project survival in an ES environment: A sociomaterial practice perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2010, 11(5):276-297.
75. Watson R. Research in information systems: What haven't we learning?. MIS Quarterly 2001, 25(4):v-xv.
76. Woodward J. Management and technology 1958, HSMO, London.