Is communication constitutive of organization?

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 151-157

  Reed, Mike ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649243725     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: 15526798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318909351583     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Browing, L.D., Greene, R.W., Sitkin, S.B., Sutcliffe, K.M., & Obstfeld, D. (2009). Constitutive complexity: Military entrepreneurs and the synthetic character of communication flows. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 89-116). New York: Routledge.
4. Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G.T. (2009). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 117-152). New York: Routledge.
5. Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organization and the organization of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. McPhee, R.D., & Iverson, J. (2009). Agents of constitution in communidad: Constitutive processes of communication in organizations. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 49-88). New York: Routledge.
7. McPhee, R.D., & Zaug, P. (2009). The communicative constitution of organization: A framework for explanation. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 21-48). New York: Routledge.
8. Mouzelis, N.P. (2008). Modern and postmodern social theorizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Putnam, L.L., & McPhee, R. (2009). Theory building: Comparisons of CCO orientations. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 187-208). New York: Routledge.
10. Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. New York: Routledge.
11. Reed, M. (2003). The agency/structure dilemma in organization theory: Open doors and brick walls. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory: Meta-theoretical perspectives (pp. 289-309). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Reed, M. (2004). Getting real about organizational discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 413-420). London: Sage.
13. Reed, M. (2005). Reflections on the realist turn in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1621-1644.
14. Reed, M. (2008). Exploring Plato's cave: Critical realism in the study of organization and management. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 68-78). London: Sage.
15. Reed, M. (2009a). Critical realism in critical management studies. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgeman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 52-75). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Reed, M. (2009b). Critical realism: Philosophy, method, or philosophy in search of a method? In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 430-448). London: Sage.
17. Scott, J. (1991). Who rules Britain? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
18. Taylor, J.R. (2009). Organizing from the bottom up? Reflections on the constitution of organization in communication. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 153-186). New York: Routledge.