Factors influencing consumption of farmed seafood products in the Pacific northwest

Appetite

Volumn 66, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-9

  Hall, Troy E ^a   Amberg, Shannon M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Farmed fish; Mass media; Risk perception; Seafood consumption

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FISH; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; INCOME; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEA FOOD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHELLFISH;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANIMALS; AQUACULTURE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FISHES; FOOD PREFERENCES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; NORTHWESTERN UNITED STATES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEAFOOD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875633226     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abroms L.C., Maibach E.W. The effectiveness of mass communication to change public behavior. Annual Review of Public Health 2008, 29:219-234.
2. Amberg S.M., Hall T.E. Precision and rhetoric in media reporting about contamination in farmed salmon. Science Communication 2010, 32(4):489-513.
3. Brunsø K., Verbeke W., Olsen S.O. Motives, barriers and quality evaluation in fish consumption situations. Exploring and comparing heavy and light users in Spain and Belgium. British Food Journal 2009, 111(7):699-716.
4. Burger J., Gochfeld M. Perceptions of the risks and benefits of fish consumption. Individual choices to reduce risk and increase health benefits. Environmental Research 2009, 109(3):343-349.
5. Carducci A., Alfani S., Sassi M., Cinini A., Calamusa A. Mass media health information. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of daily press coverage and its relation with public perceptions. Patient Education and Counseling 2011, 82:475-478.
6. Clover C. The end of the line. How overfishing is changing the world and what we eat 2006, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
7. Dillman D.A. Mail and internet surveys. The tailored design method 2006, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
8. Fleming K., Thorson E., Zhang Y. Going beyond exposure to local news media. An information-processing examination of public perceptions of food safety. Journal of Health Communication 2006, 11(8):789-806.
9. Frewer L.J., Miles S., Marsh R. The media and genetically modified foods. Evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis 2002, 22(4):701-711.
10. Green J.M., Draper A.K., Dowler E.A. Short cuts to safety. Risk and " rules of thumb" in accounts of food choice. Health, Risk & Society 2003, 5(1):33-52.
11. Hicks D., Pivarnik L., McDermott R. Consumer perceptions about seafood. An internet survey. Journal of Foodservice 2008, 19(4):213-226.
12. Hites R., Foran J., Carpenter D., Hamilton M., Knuth B.A., Schwager S. Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science 2004, 303:226-229.
13. Honkanen P., Olsen S.O. Environmental and animal welfare issues in food choice. The case of farmed fish. British Food Journal 2009, 111(3):293-309.
14. Kaiser M., Stead S. Uncertainties and values in European aquaculture. Communication, management and policy issues in times of " changing public perceptions" Aquaculture International 2002, 10:469-490.
15. Kearney J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 2010, 365:2793-2807.
16. Kole A.P.W., Altintzoglou T., Schelvis-Smit R.A.A.M., Luten J.B. The effects of different types of product information on the consumer product evaluation for fresh cod in real life settings. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:187-194.
17. Lockie S., Lyons K., Lawrence G., Mummery K. Eating " green" Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociologia Ruralis 2002, 42(1):23-39.
18. Mazur N., Curtis A. Risk perceptions, aquaculture, and issues of trust. Lessons from Australia. Society and Natural Resources 2006, 19:791-808.
19. Mazur N.A., Curtis A.L. Understanding community perceptions of aquaculture. Lessons from Australia. Aquaculture International 2008, 16(6):601-621.
20. Naylor R., Hindar K., Fleming I., Goldburg R., Williams S., Volpe J., et al. Fugitive salmon. Assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience 2005, 55(5):427-437.
21. Pauly D., Christensen V., Dalsgaard J., Froese R., Torres F. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 1998, 279(February 6):860-863.
22. Pedhauzur E.J., Schmelkin L.P. Measurement, design, and analysis. An integrated approach 1991, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
23. Pieniak Z., Verbeke W., Scholderer J. Health-related beliefs and consumer knowledge as determinants of fish consumption. Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics 2010, 23(5):480-488.
24. Pieniak Z., Verbeke W., Scholderer J., Brunsø K. Impact of consumers' health beliefs, health involvement and risk perception on fish consumption. A study in five European countries. British Food Journal 2008, 110(9):898-915.
25. Rosati S., Saba A. The perception of risks associated with food-related hazards and the perceived reliability of sources of information. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2004, 39(5):491-500.
26. US Census Bureau (2008). Factsheets for Idaho and Washington. http://www.census.gov.
27. Vanhonacker F., Altintzoglou T., Luten J.B., Verbeke W. Does fish origin matter to European consumers? Insights from a consumer survey in Belgium, Norway and Spain. British Food Journal 2011, 113(4):535-549.
28. Verbeke W., Sioen I., Brunsø K., De Henauw S., Van Camp J. Consumer perception versus scientific evidence of farmed and wild fish. Exploratory insights from Belgium. Aquaculture International 2007, 15:121-136.
29. Verbeke W., Vackier I. Individual determinants of fish consumption. Application of the theory of planned behavior. Appetite 2005, 44(1):67-82.
30. Verbeke W., Vanhonacker F., Sioen I., Van Camp J., De Henauw S. Perceived importance of sustainability and ethics related to fish. A consumer behavior perspective. Ambio 2007, 36(7):580-585.
31. Verbeke W., Ward R.W., Viaene J. Probit analysis of fresh meat consumption in Belgium. Exploring BSE and television communication impact. Agribusiness 2000, 16(2):215-234.
32. Whitmarsh D., Palmieri M.G. Consumer behavior and environmental preferences. A case study of Scottish salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture Research 2011, 42:142-247.