Uncertainties and values in European aquaculture: Communication, management and policy issues in times of "changing public perceptions"

Aquaculture International

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 469-490

  Kaiser, M ^a   Stead, S M ^b  

^a National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT)   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aquaculture; Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM); Management; Participatory fora; Policy; Sustainable development and uncertainty

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0038033771     PISSN: 09676120     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023963326201     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Åsgård, T., Austreng, E., Holmefjord, I., Hillestad, M. and Shearer, K. 1999. Resource efficiency in the production of various species. In: N. Svennevig, H. Reinertsen and M. New (eds), Sustainable Aquaculture - Food for the Future? A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam.
2. Barnabé, G. and Barnabé-Quet, R. 2000. Ecology and Management of Coastal Waters: The Qquatic Environment. Springer - Praxis Books in Aquaculture and Fisheries, UK, 396 pp.
3. De Silva, S.S. 1999. Feed resources, usage and sustainability. In: N. Svennevig, H. Reinertsen and M. New (eds), Sustainable Aquaculture - Food for the Future? A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam.
4. European Commission 1999. Towards a European Integrated Coastal Zone (ICZM) Strategy: General Principles and Policy Options - A Reflection Paper. European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg. Available from http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/iczm/disdoc1.htm.
5. European Commission 2000. Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on ICZM: A Strategy for Europe (COM (2000) 547). Available from http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/iczm/comm2000.htm.
6. FAO 2000. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. www.fao.org/docrep/003/x8002e/x8002e00.htm.
7. Fiorino, D. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 15: 226-243.
8. Fixdal, J. 1998. Public Participation in Technology - An Analysis with Focus on Three European Models for Public and Their Contribution to a Well Informed and Democratic Governance of Technology, TMV Skriftserie nr.37. Centre for Technology and Culture. University of Oslo, Oslo.
9. Forsberg, E.-M. and Kaiser, M. 2000. Norske fiskerier mot 2020 - strategier og verdier. De nasjonale forskningsetiske komiteer: Oslo; www.etikkom.no/NENT/Fiskerirapport.pdf.
10. Forster, I. 1999. Aquaculture, chickens, salmon: a case study. World Aquaculture Magazine 30: 33-70.
11. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. 1993. Science for the Post-Normal Age, Futures 25/7.
12. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. 1999. Post-Normal Science - An Insight Now Maturing, Futures. 31/7.
13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge - The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE, London.
14. Howarth, W. 1995. The Essentials of Aquaculture Regulation, in: FAO/NACA, Report on a Regional Study and Workshop on the Environmental Assesment and Management of Aquaculture Development (TCP/RAS/2253):459-465. NACA. Environment and Aquaculture Development Series. No1. NACA, Bangkok.
15. Jacobs, M. 2000. Investigation of PCDD's, PCDF's and selected Coplaner PCB's in Scottish Farmed Atlantic Salmon. Organohalogen Compounds 47: 338-346.
16. Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, Science Museum, London.
17. Kaiser, M. 2000. Diskurs oder Konfrontation in Fragen der Gentechnik? In: A. Spök und K. Hartmann (eds), GENug gestritten?!, Leykam, Graz.
18. Kaiser, M. and Forsberg, E.-M. 2001. Assessing fisheries - using an ethical matrix in a participatory process. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14(2): 191-200.
19. Kjorsvik, E. and Stead, S.M. (eds) 2001. Proceedings from New Species. New Technologies. International Conference Organised by the European Aquaculture Society and Nor-Fishing Foundation, Trondheim, Norway, 4-7 August 2001.
20. Kluver, L., Nentwich, M., Peissl, W., Torgersen, H., Gloede, F., Hennen, L., van Eijndhoven, J., van Est, R., Joss, S., Bellucci, S. and Bütschi, D. 2000. EUROPTA: European Participatory Technology Assessment - Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making, The Danish Board of Technology: www.tekno.dk/europta/Report.doc.
21. MacAlister Elliott and Partners Ltd. 1999. Forward Study of Community Aquaculture: Summary Report. European Commission Fisheries Directorate General, Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, 60 pp.
22. Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Primavera, J.H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M.C., Clay, J., Folke, C., Lubchenco, J., Mooney, H. and Troell, M. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017-1024.
23. Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P. (eds) 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Kluwer: Amsterdam.
24. Wurmann, C.F. 2001. Opportunities and challenges of diversification in Aquaculture production: a global perspective for the coming decades. In: E. Kj∨svik and S. Stead (eds), New Species, New Technologies, Trondheim, Norway, 4-7 August 2001. International Conference Organised by the European Aquaculture Society and Nor-Fishing Foundation.
25. Wynne, B. 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning. Global Environmental Change June: 111-127.
26. Ziman, J. 1996. Is science losing its objectivity? Nature 382: 751-754.