Non-parametric Bayesian approach to post-translational modification refinement of predictions from tandem mass spectrometry

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 821-829

  Chung, Clement ^a   Emili, Andrew ^b,c   Frey, Brendan J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Banting and Best Department of Medical Research   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PROTEOME;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HUMANS; PHOSPHOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84875623172     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt056     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agilent (2005) Spectrum mill. http://www.chem.agilent.com/en-US/Products- Services/Software-Informatics/Spectrum-Mill/pages/default.aspx.
2. Albuquerque, C.P. et al. (2008) A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 7, 1389-1396.
3. Antoniak, C.E. (1974) Mixtures of Dirichlet processes with applications to Bayesian nonparametric problems. Ann. Stat., 2, 1152-1174.
4. Bailey, C.M. et al. (2009) SLoMo: automated site localization of modifications from ETD/ECD mass spectra. J. Proteome Res., 8, 1965-1971.
5. Baker, P.R. et al. (2011) Modification site localization scoring integrated into a search engine. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 10, M111.008078.
6. Beausoleil, S. et al. (2004) Large-scale characterization of hela cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 12130-12135.
7. Beausoleil, S.A. et al. (2006) A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol., 24, 1285-1292.
8. Bishop, C.M. (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, NY, USA.
9. Cantin, G.T. and Yates, J.R. (2004) Strategies for shotgun identification of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr., 1053, 7-14.
10. Chalkley, R.J. and Clauser, K.R. (2012) Modification site localization scoring: strategies and performance. Mol. Cell Proteomics., 11, 3-14.
11. Chung, C. et al. (2011) Computational refinement of post-translational modifications predicted from tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics, 27, 797-806.
12. Domon, B. and Aebersold, R. (2006) Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science, 312, 212-217.
13. Escobar, M.D. and West, M. (1994) Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 90, 577-588.
14. Ferguson, T.S. (1973) A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Stat., 1, 209-230.
15. Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel., PAMI-6, 721-741.
16. Han, Y. et al. (2005) Spider: software for protein identification from sequence tags with de novo sequencing error. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 3, 697-716.
17. Jain, S. and Neal, R. (2000) A split-merge Markov chain Monte Carlo procedure for the Dirichlet process mixture model. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 13, 158-182.
18. Keller, A. et al. (2002) Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem., 74, 5383-5392.
19. Krogan, N. et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 440, 637-643.
20. Lehninger, A.L. et al. (1993) Principles of Biochemistry, 2nd edn. Worth Publishing, New York, NY.
21. Liu, C. et al. (2006) Peptide sequence tag-based blind identification of post-translational modifications with point process model. Bioninformatics, 22, e307-e313.
22. Liu, J. et al. (2008) Sequential interval motif search: unrestricted database searching of global MS/MS datasets for unexpected post-translational modifications. Anal. Chem., 80, 7846-7854.
23. Mikesh, L.M. et al. (2006) The utility of ETD mass spectrometry in proteomic analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1764, 1811-1822.
24. Na, S. and Paek, E. (2009) Prediction of novel modifications by unrestrictive search of tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res., 8, 4418-4427.
25. Neal, R. (2000a) Slice sampling. Ann. Stat., 31, 705-767.
26. Neal, R.M. (2000b) Markov chain sampling methods for Dirichlet process mixture models. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 9, 249-265.
27. Olsen, J.V. et al. (2006) Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling network. Cell, 127, 635-648.
28. Phanstiel, D.H. et al. (2011) Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 8, 821-827.
29. Puig, O. et al. (2001) The tandem affinity purification (tap) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods, 24, 218-229.
30. Ramakrishnan, S. et al. (2009a) Mining gene functional networks to improve mass-spectrometry based protein identification. Bioinformatics, 25, 2955-2961.
31. Ramakrishnan, S.R. et al. (2009b) Integrating shotgun proteomics and mRNA expression data to improve protein identification. Bioinformatics, 25, 1397-1403.
32. Rasmussen, C.E. (2000) The infinite Gaussian mixture model. In: Solla, S.A., Leen, T.K. and Müller, K.-R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 554-560.
33. Rigaut, G. et al. (1999) A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol., 17, 1030-1032.
34. Savitski, M.M. et al. (2011) Confident phosphorylation site localization using the mascot delta score. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 10, M110.003830.
35. Searle, B. et al. (2006) Identification of protein modifications using MS/MS de novo sequencing and the opensea alignment algorithm. J. Proteome Res., 4, 546-554.
36. Tanner, S. et al. (2005) Inspect: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem., 77, 4626-4639.
37. Tanner, S. et al. (2008) Accurate annotation of peptide modifications through unrestrictive database search. J. Proteome Res., 7, 170-181.
38. Taus, T. et al. (2011) Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphors. J. Proteome Res., 10, 5354-5362.
39. Tsur, D. et al. (2005) Identification of post-translational modifications by blind search of mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol., 23, 1562-1567.