Accelerated gene evolution through replication-transcription conflicts

Nature

Volumn 495, Issue 7442, 2013, Pages 512-515

  Paul, Sandip ^a   Million Weaver, Samuel ^a   Chattopadhyay, Sujay ^a   Sokurenko, Evgeni ^a   Merrikh, Houra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

ACCELERATION; AMINO ACID; BACTERIUM; BIOASSAY; COLLISION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MUTATION;

ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; DNA REPLICATION; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AMINO ACIDS; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; DNA REPLICATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; GENES, BACTERIAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTAGENESIS; POINT MUTATION; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

BACILLUS SUBTILIS;

EID: 84875609978     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature11989     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rocha, E. P. & Danchin, A. Geneessentialitydetermines chromosome organisation in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6570-6577 (2003).
2. Rocha, E. P. & Danchin, A. Essentiality, not expressiveness, drives gene-strand bias in bacteria. Nature Genet. 34, 377-378 (2003).
3. Rocha, E. P. The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150, 1609-1627 (2004).
4. Price, M. N., Alm, E. J. & Arkin, A. P. Interruptions in gene expression drive highly expressed operons to the leading strand of DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 3224-3234 (2005).
5. Merrikh, H., Zhang, Y., Grossman, A. D. & Wang, J. D. Replication-transcription conflicts in bacteria. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 10, 449-458 (2012).
6. Mirkin, E. V. & Mirkin, S. M. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 13-35 (2007).
7. Pomerantz, R. T. & O'Donnell, M. Direct restart of a replication fork stalled by a head-on RNA polymerase. Science 327, 590-592 (2010).
8. De Septenville, A. L., Duigou, S., Boubakri, H. & Michel, B. Replication fork reversal after replication-transcription collision. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002622 (2012).
9. Chattopadhyay, S. et al. High frequency of hotspot mutations in core genes of Escherichia coli due to short-term positive selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12412-12417 (2009).
10. Kobayashi, K. et al. Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4678-4683 (2003).
11. Hughes, A. L. & Nei, M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335, 167-170 (1988).
12. Christin, P. A., Weinreich, D. M. & Besnard, G. Causes and evolutionary significance of genetic convergence. Trends Genet. 26, 400-405 (2010).
13. Tenaillon, O. et al. The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science 335, 457-461 (2012).
14. Mirkin, E. V. & Mirkin, S. M. Mechanisms of transcription-replication collisions in bacteria. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 888-895 (2005).
15. Srivatsan, A., Tehranchi, A., MacAlpine, D. M. & Wang, J. D. Co-orientation of replication and transcription preserves genome integrity. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000810 (2010).
16. Kim, N., Abdulovic, A. L., Gealy, R., Lippert, M. J. & Jinks-Robertson, S. Transcription-associated mutagenesis in yeast is directly proportional to the level of gene expression and influenced by the direction of DNA replication. DNA Repair 6, 1285-1296 (2007).
17. Veaute, X. & Fuchs, R. P. Greater susceptibility to mutations in lagging strand of DNA replication in Escherichia coli than in leading strand. Science 261, 598-600 (1993).
18. Fijalkowska, I. J., Jonczyk, P., Tkaczyk, M. M., Bialoskorska, M. & Schaaper, R. M. Unequal fidelity of leading strand and lagging strand DNA replication on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10020-10025 (1998).
19. Maliszewska-Tkaczyk, M., Jonczyk, P., Bialoskorska, M., Schaaper, R. M. & Fijalkowska, I. J. SOS mutator activity: unequal mutagenesis on leading and lagging strands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12678-12683 (2000).
20. Szczepanik, D. et al. Evolution rates of genes on leading and lagging DNA strands. J. Mol. Evol. 52, 426-433 (2001).
21. Lin, C. H., Lian, C. Y., Hsiung, C. A. & Chen, F. C. Changes in transcriptional orientation are associated with increases in evolutionary rates of enterobacterial genes. BMC Bioinformatics 12 (suppl. 9), S19 (2011).
22. Juurik, T. et al. Mutation frequency and spectrum of mutations vary at different chromosomal positions of Pseudomonas putida. PLoS ONE 7, e48511 10.1371/journal.pone.0048511 (2012).
23. Dennis, G. Jr et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 4, 3 (2003).
24. Chenna, R. et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal seriesofprograms. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3497-3500 (2003).
25. Nei, M. & Gojobori, T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3, 418-426 (1986).
26. Suzuki, Y. & Gojobori, T. in The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to DNAand Protein Phylogeny1stedn(edsSalemi, M & Vandamme, A.-M.) 283-311 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003).
27. Chattopadhyay, S., Dykhuizen, D. E. & Sokurenko, E. V. ZPS: visualization of recent adaptive evolution of proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 187 (2007).
28. Librado, P. & Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451-1452 (2009).
29. Sarkar, S., Ma, W. T. & Sandri, G. H. On fluctuation analysis: a new, simple and efficient method for computing the expected number of mutants. Genetica 85, 173-179 (1992).
30. Hall, B. M., Ma, C. X., Liang, P. & Singh, K. K. Fluctuation analysis CalculatOR: aweb tool for the determination of mutation rate using Luria-Delbruck fluctuation analysis. Bioinformatics 25, 1564-1565 (2009).