" Why am I paraphrasing?": Undergraduate ESL writers' engagement with source-based academic writing and reading

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 87-98

  Hirvela, Alan ^a   Du, Qian ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Paraphrasing; Plagiarism; Summarizing; Textual borrowing; Writing from sources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875601085     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bereiter C., Scardamalia M. The psychology of written composition 1987, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Campbell C. Writing with others' words: using background reading text in academic compositions. Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom 1990, 211-230. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Kroll (Ed.).
3. Campbell C. Teaching second language writing: Interacting with text 1998, Heinle & Heinle, Boston.
4. Currie P. Staying out of trouble: apparent plagiarism and academic survival. Journal of Second Language Writing 1998, 7:1-18.
5. Eisenberger N.I. Why rejection hurts. Future science: Essays from the cutting edge 2011, 170-183. Vintage Books, New York. M. Brockman (Ed.).
6. Ferris D.R., Hedgcock J.S. Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
7. Hedgcock J.S., Ferris D.R. Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts 2009, Routledge, New York.
8. Hirvela A. Connecting reading & writing in second language writing instruction 2004, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
9. Howard R.M. Plagiarism, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English 1995, 57:788-806.
10. Howard R.M. Standing in the shadow of giants 1999, Ablex, Stamford, CT.
11. Howard, R. M. (2001, March). Plagiarism: what should a teacher do? Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Denver, Colorado.
12. Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing 2000, Longman, Harlow.
13. Hyland F. Dealing with plagiarism when giving feedback. ELT Journal 2001, 35:375-381.
14. Johns A.M. Summary protocols of " underprepared" and " adept" university students: replications and distortions of the original. Language Learning 1985, 35:495-512.
15. Johns A.M., Mayes P. An analysis of summary protocols of university ESL students. Applied Linguistics 1990, 11:253-271.
16. Keck C. The use of paraphrase in summary writing: a comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006, 15:261-278.
17. Kucer S. The making of meaning: reading and writing as parallel processes. Written Communication 1985, 2:317-336.
18. Macbeth K.P. Diverse, unforeseen, and quaint difficulties: the sensible responses of novices learning to follow instructions in academic writing. Research in the Teaching of English 2006, 41:181-207.
19. Macbeth K.P. Deliberate false provisions: the use and usefulness of models in learning academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2010, 19:33-48.
20. McClure S.M. Our brains know why we do what we do. Future science: Essays from the cutting edge 2011, 114-126. Vintage Books, New York. M. Brockman (Ed.).
21. McGinley W. The role of reading and writing while composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly 1992, 27:227-248.
22. Murray, A., Parrish, J., & Salvatori, M. (1998, April). To rewrite the text I am reading: pedagogies of quotation. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Chicago, Illinois.
23. Pecorari D. Good and original: plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second- language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003, 12:317-345.
24. Pecorari D. Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis 2008, Continuum, London.
25. Prior P. Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses: a case study of response, revision, and disciplinary enculturation. Research in the Teaching of English 1995, 29(3):288-325.
26. Richardson W. Footprints in the digital age. Educational Leadership 2008, 66(3):16-19. Retrieved from. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov08/vol66/num03/Footprints-in-the-Digital-Age.aspx.
27. Sarig G. Composing a study-summary: a reading/writing encounter. Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives 1993, 161-182. Heinle & Heinle, Boston. J.G. Carson, I. Leki (Eds.).
28. Shi L. Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication 2004, 21:171-200.
29. Shi L. Textual appropriation and citing behaviors of university undergraduates. Applied Linguistics 2008, 31:1-24.
30. Spivey N. Transforming texts: constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication 1990, 7:256-287.
31. Stigler S. Correlation and causation: a comment. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2005, 48(1):S88-S94.
32. Uemlianin I.A. Engaging text: assessing paraphrase and understanding. Studies in Higher Education 2000, 25:347-358.
33. Winograd P.N. Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly 1984, 19:404-425.
34. Yamada K. What prevents ESL/EFL writers from avoiding plagiarism? Analyses of 10 North American college websites. System 2003, 31:247-258.