Sensitivity to synchronicity of biological motion in normal and amblyopic vision

Vision Research

Volumn 83, Issue , 2013, Pages 9-18

  Luu, Jennifer Y ^a   Levi, Dennis M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Amblyopia; Biological motion; Stereopsis; Synchronicity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DANCING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 84875588251     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aaen-Stockdale C., Ledgeway T., Hess R.F. Second-order optic flow deficits in amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007, 48(12):5532-5538.
2. Aggarwal J.K., Cai Q. Human motion analysis: A review. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1999, 73(3):428-440.
3. Aggleton J.P., Burton M.J., Passingham R.E. Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Brain Research 1980, 190(2):347-368.
4. Asper L., Crewther D., Crewther S.G. Strabismic amblyopia. Part 2. Neural processing. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2000, 83(4):200-211.
5. Barclay C.D., Cutting J.E., Kozlowski L.T. Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 1978, 23(2):145-152.
6. Bingham G.P. Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13(2):155-177.
7. Bradley A., Freeman R.D. Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1981, 21(3):467-476.
8. Ciuffreda K.J., Levi D.M., Selenow A. Amblyopia: Basic and clinical aspects 1991, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
9. Cutting J.E., Kozlowski L.T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1977, 9(5):353-356.
10. Cutting J.E., Proffitt D.R., Kozlowski L.T. A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978, 4(3):357-372.
11. di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 1992, 91(1):176-180.
12. Dittrich W.H. Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception 1993, 22(1):15-22.
13. Dittrich W.H., Troscianko T., Lea S.E., Morgan D. Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 1996, 25(6):727-738.
14. El-Shamayleh Y., Kiorpes L., Kohn A., Movshon J.A. Visual motion processing by neurons in area MT of macaque monkeys with experimental amblyopia. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(36):12198-12209.
15. Engel A.K., Konig P., Singer W. Direct physiological evidence for scene segmentation by temporal coding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1991, 88(20):9136-9140.
16. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4(3):179-192.
17. Hess R.F., Holliday I.E. The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia. Vision Research 1992, 32(7):1319-1339.
18. Hess R.F., Howell E.R. The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification. Vision Research 1977, 17(9):1049-1055.
19. Hess R.F., Mansouri B., Dakin S.C., Allen H.A. Integration of local motion is normal in amblyopia. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics Image Science an Vision 2006, 23(5):986-992.
20. Hietanen J.K., Perrett D.I. Motion sensitive cells in the macaque superior temporal polysensory area: Response discrimination between self-generated and externally generated pattern motion. Behavioural Brain Research 1996, 76(1-2):155-167.
21. Ho C.S., Paul P.S., Asirvatham A., Cavanagh P., Cline R., Giaschi D.E. Abnormal spatial selection and tracking in children with amblyopia. Vision Research 2006, 46(19):3274-3283.
22. Hoffman D.D., Flinchbaugh B.E. The interpretation of biological motion. Biological Cybernetics 1982, 42(3):195-204.
23. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
24. Johansson G. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research 1976, 38:379-393.
25. Kiorpes L. Visual processing in amblyopia: Animal studies. Strabismus 2006, 14(1):3-10.
26. Kiorpes L., McKee S.P. Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1999, 9(4):480-486.
27. Kiorpes L., Tang C., Movshon J.A. Sensitivity to visual motion in amblyopic macaque monkeys. Visual Neuroscience 2006, 23(2):247-256.
28. Klein S.A. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(8):1421-1455.
29. Koenderink J.J. Optic flow. Vision Research 1986, 26(1):161-179.
30. Kubova Z., Kuba M., Juran J., Blakemore C. Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses. Vision Research 1995, 36(1):181-190.
31. Lerner Y., Hendler T., Malach R., Harel M., Leiba H., Stolovitch C., et al. Selective fovea-related deprived activation in retinotopic and high-order visual cortex of human amblyopes. Neuroimage 2006, 33(1):169-179.
32. Lerner Y., Pianka P., Azmon B., Leiba H., Stolovitch C., Loewenstein A., et al. Area-specific amblyopic effects in human occipitotemporal object representations. Neuron 2003, 40(5):1023-1029.
33. Levi D.M. Spatial vision in amblyopia. Spatial vision 1991, Vol. 10:212-238. Macmillan Press, London.
34. Levi D.M. Visual processing in amblyopia: Human studies. Strabismus 2006, 14(1):11-19.
35. Levi D.M., Carkeet A. Amblyopia: A consequence of abnormal visual development. Early visual development, normal and abnormal 1993, 391-408. Oxford University Press, Berlin. K. Simons (Ed.).
36. Levi D.M., Harwerth R.S. Spatio-temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1977, 16(1):90-95.
37. Levi D.M., Klein S.A. Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia. Vision Research 1985, 25(7):979-991.
38. Levi D.M., Klein S.A. Sampling in spatial vision. Nature 1986, 320(6060):360-362.
39. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., Sharma V. Position jitter and undersampling in pattern perception. Vision Research 1999, 39(3):445-465.
40. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., Yap Y.L. Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Vision Research 1987, 27(4):581-597.
41. Levi D.M., Sharma V., Klein S.A. Feature integration in pattern perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94(21):11742-11746.
42. Levi D.M., Tripathy S.P. Is the ability to identify deviations in multiple trajectories compromised by amblyopia?. Journal of Vision 2006, 6(12):1367-1379.
43. Li X., Mullen K.T., Thompson B., Hess R.F. Effective connectivity anomalies in human amblyopia. Neuroimage 2011, 54(1):505-516.
44. Neri P., Luu J.Y., Levi D.M. Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9(9):1186-1192.
45. Neri P., Luu J.Y., Levi D.M. Sensitivity to biological motion drops by approximately 1/2 log-unit with inversion, and is unaffected by amblyopia. Vision Research 2007, 47(9):1209-1214.
46. Oram M.W., Perrett D. Reponses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to " biological motion" stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Science 1994, 6:99-116.
47. Oram M.W., Perrett D.I. Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76(1):109-129.
48. Pavlova M., Sokolov A. Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62(5):889-899.
49. Perrett D.I., Rolls E.T., Caan W. Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1982, 47(3):329-342.
50. Popple A.V., Levi D.M. The attentional blink in amblyopia. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(13):1-9.
51. Puce A., Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 2003, 358(1431):435-445.
52. Rislove E.M., Hall E.C., Stavros K.A., Kiorpes L. Scale-dependent loss of global form perception in strabismic amblyopia. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(12):25.
53. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
54. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 3(2):131-141.
55. Roelfsema P.R., Konig P., Engel A.K., Sireteanu R., Singer W. Reduced synchronization in the visual cortex of cats with strabismic amblyopia. European Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 6(11):1645-1655.
56. Runeson S., Frykholm G. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1983, 112(4):585-615.
57. Shadlen M.N., Movshon J.A. Synchrony unbound: A critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 1999, 24(1):67-77. 111-125.
58. Sharma V., Levi D.M., Klein S.A. Undercounting features and missing features: Evidence for a high-level deficit in strabismic amblyopia. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(5):496-501.
59. Simmers A.J., Bex P.J. The representation of global spatial structure in amblyopia. Vision Research 2004, 44(5):523-533.
60. Simmers A.J., Ledgeway T., Hess R.F., McGraw P.V. Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia. Vision Research 2003, 43(6):729-738.
61. Simmers A.J., Ledgeway T., Mansouri B., Hutchinson C.V., Hess R.F. The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia. Vision Research 2006, 46(16):2571-2580.
62. Sumi S. Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception 1984, 13(3):283-286.
63. Thompson B., Troje N.F., Hansen B.C., Hess R.F. Amblyopic perception of biological motion. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(4):21-24. (article no. 22).
64. Troje N.F., Westhoff C., Lavrov M. Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67(4):667-675.
65. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(8):1293-1313.
66. Wong E.H., Levi D.M., McGraw P.V. Is second-order spatial loss in amblyopia explained by the loss of first-order spatial input?. Vision Research 2001, 41(23):2951-2960.