Amblyopic perception of biological motion

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Thompson, Benjamin ^a   Troje, Nikolaus F ^b   Hansen, Bruce C ^c   Hess, Robert F ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Assistant Professor in the University Libraries   (United States)

Author keywords

Amblyopia; Biological motion; Global form; Inversion effect; Local motion; Segregation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREJUDICE; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 42549109002     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.4.22     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ahlström, V., Blake, R., & Ahlström, U. (1997). Perception of biological motion. Perception, 26, 1539-1548.
2. Anderson, S. J., Holliday, I. E., & Harding, G. F. (1999). Assessment of cortical dysfunction in human strabismic amblyopia using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Vision Research, 39, 1723-1738.
3. Barnes, G. R., Hess, R. F., Dumoulin, S. O., Achtman, R. L., & Pike, G. B. (2001). The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia. Journal of Physiology, 533, 281-297.
4. Barrett, B. T., Bradley, A., & McGraw, P. V. (2004). Understanding the neural basis of amblyopia. Neuroscientist, 10, 106-117.
5. Beintema, J. A., Georg, K., & Lappe, (2006). Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 613-624.
6. Beintema, J. A., & Lappe, M. (2002). Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 5661-5663.
7. Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J., (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5, 221-225.
8. Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47-73.
9. Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D., & Evans, A. (1996). Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. Journal Neuroscience, 16, 3737-3744.
10. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
11. Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2005). Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. Journal of Vision, 5(4):6, 348-360, http://journalofvision.org/5/4/6/, doi: 10.1167/5.4.6.
12. Chatterjee, S. H., Freyd, J. J., & Shiffrar, M. (1996). Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 916-929.
13. Constantinescu, T., Schmidt, L., Watson, R., & Hess, R. F. (2005). A residual deficit for global motion processing after acuity recovery in deprivation amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 46, 3008-3012.
14. Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 4, 179-192.
15. Grèzes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J (2001). Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage, 13, 775-785.
16. Grossman, E. D., Battelli, L., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion. Vision Research, 45, 2847-2853.
17. Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41, 1475-1482.
18. Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35, 1167-1175.
19. Hariharan, S., Levi, D. M., & Klein, S. A. (2005). "Crowding" in normal and amblyopic vision assessed with Gaussian and Gabor C's. Vision Research, 45, 617-633.
20. Hess, R. F. (1995). Amblyopia: A tale of two approaches. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 15, 395-397.
21. Hess, R. F. (2001). Amblyopia: Site unseen. Clinical & Experimental Optometry, 84, 321-336.
22. Hess, R. F., & Anderson, S. J. (1993). Motion sensitivity and spatial undersampling in amblyopia. Vision Research, 33, 881-896.
23. Hess, R. F., Demanins, R., & Bex, P. J. (1997). A reduced motion aftereffect in strabismic amblyopia. Vision Research, 37, 1303-1311.
24. Hess, R. F., McIlhagga, W., & Field, D. J. (1997). Contour integration in strabismic amblyopia: The sufficiency of an explanation based on positional uncertainty. Vision Research, 37, 3145-3161.
25. Hirai, M., Fukushima, H., & Hiraki, K. (2003). An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 344, 41-44.
26. Hiris, E. (2007). Detection of biological and nonbiological motion. Journal of Vision, 7(12):4, 1-16, http://journalofvision.org/7/ 12/4/, doi:10.1167/7.12.4.
27. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual-perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
28. Jokisch, D., Troje, N. F., Koch, B., Schwarz, M., & Daum, I. (2005). Differential involvement of the cerebellum in biological and coherent motion perception. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 3439-3446.
29. Kiorpes, L. (2006). Visual processing in amblyopia: Animal studies. Strabismus, 14, 3-10.
30. Kiorpes, L., Kiper, D. C., O'Keefe, L. P., Cavanaugh, J. R., & Movshon, J. A. (1998). Neuronal correlates of amblyopia in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental strabismus and anisometropia. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 6411-6424.
31. Kiorpes, L., Tang, C., & Movshon, J. A. (1999). Factors limiting contrast sensitivity in experimentally amblyopic macaque monkeys. Vision Research, 19, 4152-4160.
32. Kiorpes, L., Tang, C., & Movshon, J. A. (2006). Sensitivity to visual motion in amblyopic macaque monkeys. Visual Neuroscience, 23, 247-256.
33. Lange, J., Georg, K., & Lappe, M. (2006). Visual perception of biological motion by form: A template-matching analysis. Journal of Vision, 6(8):6, 836-849, http://journalofvision.org/6/8/6/, doi:10.1167/6.8.6.
34. Levi, D. M. (2006). Visual processing in amblyopia: Human studies. Strabismus, 14, 11-19.
35. Levi, D. M., & Klein, S. A. (1985). Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia. Vision Research, 25, 979-991.
36. Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., & Aitsebaomo, P. (1984). Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers. Vision Research, 24, 789-800.
37. Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., & Yap, Y. L. (1987). Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Vision Research, 27, 581-597.
38. Mansouri, B., & Hess, R. F. (2006). The global processing deficit in amblyopia involves noise segregation. Vision Research, 46, 4104-4117.
39. Mather, G., & Murdoch, L. (1994). Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 258, 273-279.
40. Mather, G., Radford, K., & West, S. (1992). Low-level visual processing of biological motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 249, 149-155.
41. Movshon, J. A., Eggers, H. M., Gizzi, M. S., Hendrickson, A. E., Kiorpes, L., & Boothe, R. G. (1987). Effects of early unilateral blur on the macaque's visual system. III. Physiological observations. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 1340-1351.
42. Neri, P., Luu, J. Y., & Levi, D. M. (2007). Sensitivity to biological motion drops by approximately 1/2 log-unit with inversion, and is unaffected by amblyopia. Vision Research, 47, 1209-1214.
43. Pavlova, M., & Sokolov, A. (2000). Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 899-899.
44. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolboX software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
45. Pelphrey, K. A., Mitchell, T. V., McKeown, M. J., Goldstein, J., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (2003). Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: Controlling for meaningful coherent motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 6819-6825.
46. Peuskens, H., Vanrie, J., Verfaillie, K., & Orban, G. A. (2005). Specificity of regions processing biological motion. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21; 2864-2875.
47. Puce A., & Perrett, D. (2003). Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Science, 358, 435-445.
48. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302-308.
49. Simmers, A. J., & Bex, P. J. (2004). The representation of global spatial structure in amblyopia. Vision Research, 44, 523-533.
50. Simmers, A. J., Ledgeway, T., & Hess, R. F. (2005). The influences of visibility and anomalous integration processes on the perception of global spatial form versus motion in human amblyopia. Vision Research, 45, 449-460.
51. Simmers, A. J., Ledgeway, T., Hess, R. F., & McGraw, P. V. (2003). Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia. Vision Research, 43, 729-738.
52. Simmers, A. J., Ledgeway, T., Mansouri, B., Hutchinson, C. V., & Hess, R. F. (2006). The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia. Vision Research, 46, 2571-2580.
53. Sumi, S. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283-286.
54. Thiele, A., Bremmer, F., Ilg, U. J., & Hoffmann, K. P. (1997). Visual responses of neurons from areas V1 and MT in a monkey with late onset strabismus: A case study. Vision Research, 37, 853-863.
55. Thompson, B., Hansen, B. C., Hess, R. F., & Troje, N. F. (2007). Peripheral vision: Good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation? Journal of Vision, 7(10):12, 1-7, http://journalofvision.org/7/10/12/, doi:10.1167/7.10.12.
56. Thompson, J. C., Clarke, M., Stewart, T., & Puce, A. (2005). Configural processing of biological motion in human superior temporal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 9059-9066.
57. Troje, N. F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2(5):2, 371-387, http://journalofvision.org/2/5/2/, doi:10.1167/ 2.5.2.
58. Troje, N. F., Sadr, J., Geyer, H., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision, 6(8):7, 850-857, http://journalofvision.org/ 6/8/7/, doi:10.1167/6.8.7.
59. Troje, N. F., & Westhoff, C. (2006). The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a "life detector?" Current Biology, 16, 821-824.
60. Vaina, L. M., Lemay, M., Bienfang, D. C., Choi, A. Y., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Intact "biological motion" and "structure from motion" perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study. Visual Neuroscience, 5, 353-369.
61. Vaina, L. M., Solomon, J., Chowdhury, S., Sinha, P., & Belliveau, J. W. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 11656-11661.