Can elevated CO2 and ozone shift the genetic composition of aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands?

New Phytologist

Volumn 198, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 466-475

  Moran, Emily V ^a,b   Kubiske, Mark E ^c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^c US Forest Service Northern Research Station   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; CO 2; FACE; Growth; Mortality; Ozone; Populus tremuloides (aspen); Selection

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DATA SET; DECIDUOUS TREE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH RESPONSE; OZONE; POLLUTION EFFECT; POPULATION STRUCTURE; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; SELECTION; STAND STRUCTURE; TIMESCALE;

POPULUS; POPULUS TREMULOIDES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; OZONE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DRUG EFFECT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; POPULUS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BAYES THEOREM; CARBON DIOXIDE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OZONE; POPULUS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84875543391     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12153     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Andalo C, Goldringer I, Godelle B. 2001. Inter- and intragenotypic competition under elevated carbon dioxide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 82: 157-164.
2. Bailey JK, Wooley SC, Lindroth RL, Whitham TG. 2006. Importance of species interactions to community heritability: a genetic basis to trophic-level interactions. Ecology Letters 9: 78-85.
3. Bangert RK. 2008. Genetic structure of a foundation species: scaling community phenotypes from the individual to the region. Heredity 100: 121-131.
4. Bangert RK, Allan GJ, Turek RJ, Wimp GM, Meneses N, Martinsen GD, Keim P, Whitham TG. 2006. From genes to geography: a genetic similarity rule for arthropod community structure at multiple geographic scales. Molecular Ecology 15: 4215-4228.
5. Berrang P, Karnosky DF, Bennett JP. 1989. Natural selection for ozone tolerance in Populus tremuloides: field verification. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 519-522.
6. Bussotti F. 2008. Functional leaf traits, plant communities, and acclimation processes in relation to oxidative stress in trees: a critical overview. Global Change Biology 14: 2727-2739.
7. Clark JS. 2005. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology Letters 8: 2-14.
8. Clark JS. 2007 Models for ecological data: an introduction. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
9. 2 have increased growth in natural stands of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). Global Change Biology 16: 2186-2197.
10. Curlin JW. 1967. Clonal differences in the yield response of Populus deltoides to nitrogen fertilization. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America31: 276-280.
11. 3 on paper birch (Betula papyrifera): reproductive fitness. The Scientific World Journal 7(Suppl 1): 240-246.
12. Darbah JNT, Sharkey TD, Calfapietra C, Karnosky DF. 2009. Differential response of aspen and birch trees to heat stress under elevated carbon dioxide. Environmental Pollution 158: 1008-1014.
13. Dickinson NM, Turner AP, Lepp NW. 1991. How do trees and other long-lived plants survive in polluted environments? Functional Ecology 5: 5-11.
14. Dickson LL, Whitham TG. 1996. Genetically-based plant resistance traits affect arthropods, fungi, and birds. Oecologia 106: 400-406.
15. 3 Enrichment (FACE) project: an overview. In General Technical Report. North Central Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
16. Dodd ME, Silvertown J. 2000. Size-specific fecundity and the influence of lifetime size variation upon effective population size in Abies balsamea. Heredity 85: 604-609.
17. Fagnano M, Merola G. 2007. Ozone and water stress: effects on the behavior of two white clover biotypes. Italian Journal of Agronomy 1: 3-12.
18. Farmer RE, Garlick K, Watson SR. 1988. Heritability and C effects in a 3-year old balsam poplar clonal test. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 1059-1062.
19. Fowler C, Cape JN, Coyle M, Flechard C, Kuylenstierna J, Hicks K, Derwent D, Johnson C, Stevenson D. 1999. The global exposure of forests to air pollutants. Water Air Soil Pollution 116: 5-32.
20. Gelfand AE, Ghosh SK. 1998. Model choice: a minimum posterior predictive loss approach. Biometrika 85: 1-11.
21. 2 enrichment. Tree Physiology 25: 1399-1408.
22. Gillespie JH. 2004 Population genetics; a concise guide. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Burczyk J, Nathan R, Nanos N, Gil L, Alia R. 2006. Effective gene dispersal and female reproductive success in Mediterranean maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton). Molecular Ecology 15: 4577-4588.
24. Haikio E, Freiwald V, Silfver T, Beuker E, Holopainen T, Oksanen E. 2009. Differences in leaf characteristics between ozone sensitive and tolerant hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × P. tremuloides) clones. Tree Physiology 29: 53-66.
25. Haxeltine A, Prentice IC. 1996. BIOME3: an equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 4: 693-709.
26. Heagle AS, McLaughlin MR, Miller JE, Joyner RL, Spruill SE. 1991. Adaptation of a white clover population to ozone stress. New Phytologist 119: 61-68.
27. 2 in even-aged monospecific stands of Chenopodium album. Functional Ecology 17: 786-795.
28. 2 elevation, canopy photosynthesis, and optimal leaf area index. Ecology 78: 2339-2350.
29. Hwang SY, Lindroth RL. 1997. Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 111: 99-108.
30. IPCC. 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, eds. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY, USA & Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Isebrands JG, McDonald EP, Kruger E, Hendrey G, Percy K, Pregitzer K, Sober J, Karnosky DF. 2001. Growth reponses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting elevated carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental Pollution 115: 359-371.
32. Karnosky DF, Percy K, Mankovska B, Prichard T, Noormets A, Dickson RE, Jepson E, Isebrands JG. 2003 Ozone affects the fitness of trembling aspen. In: Karnosky DF, Percy K, Chappelka AH, Simpson C, Pikkarainen J, eds. Air pollution, global change, and forests in the new millennium. Boston, MA, USA: Elsevier, 199-210.
33. Kobe RK, Coates KD. 1997. Models of sapling mortality as a function of growth to characterize interspecific variation in shade tolerance of eight tree species of northwestern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 227-236.
34. 2 and tropospheric ozone. Plant, Cell & Environment 33: 1016-1028.
35. 3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Global Change Biology 11: 1387-1401.
36. 3 on intra- and interspecific competitive ability of aspen. Plant Biology 9: 342-355.
37. 2 levels and the fecundity of forest trees. Science 292: 95-98.
38. 2 and tree fecundity: the role of tree size, interannual variability, and population heterogeneity. Global Change Biology 12: 822-833.
39. 2. Functional Ecology 20: 541-547.
40. Lee JC, Steiner KC, Zhang JW, Skelly JM. 2002. Heritability of ozone sensitivity in open-pollinated families of black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). Forest Science 48: 111-117.
41. 2: productivity, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Ecology 74: 763-777.
42. 2 enrichment. Oecologia 126: 371-379.
43. Luquez V, Hall D, Albrectsen BR, Karlsson J, Ingvarsson P, Jansson S. 2008. Natural phenological variation in aspen (Populus tremula): the SwAsp collection. Tree Genetics and Genomes 4: 279-292.
44. Madritch M, Donaldson JR, Lindroth RL. 2006. Genetic identity of Populus tremuloides litter influences decomposition and nutrient release in a mixed forest stand. Ecosystems 9: 528-537.
45. Madritch MD, Greene SL, Lindroth RL. 2009. Genetic mosaics of ecosystem functioning across aspen-dominated landscapes. Oecologia 160: 119-127.
46. 2 and in high- and low-fertility soil. American Journal of Botany 86: 1154-1159.
47. van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Mutch LS, Johnson VG, Esperanza AM, Parsons DJ. 2003. Growth rate predicts mortality of Abies concolor in both burned and unburned stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 1029-1038.
48. Matyssek R, Wieser G, Nunna AJ, Kozovits AR, Reiter IM, Heerdt C, Winkler JB, Baumgarten M, Haberle KHH, Grams TEE, et al. 2004. Comparison between AOT40 and ozone uptake in forest trees of different species, age and site conditions. Atmospheric Environment 38: 2271-2281.
49. 3 in aggrading aspen stands. Functional Ecology 16: 792-801.
50. McIntyre PJ, Whitham TG. 2003. Plant genotype affects long-term herbivore population dynamics and extinction: conservation implications. Ecology 84: 311-322.
51. Mitton JB, Grant MC. 1980. Observations on the ecology and evolution of quaking aspen, Populus tremuloides, in the Colorado Front Range. American Journal of Botany 67: 202-209.
52. Mitton JB, Grant MC. 1996. Genetic variation and the natural history of quaking aspen. BioScience 46: 25-31.
53. Moran EV, Clark JS. 2012. Variation in reproductive success in forest trees: its causes and consequences. Ecology 93: 1082-1094.
54. 2 concentration. Oecologia 165: 809-818.
55. 2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 18052-18056.
56. Osier TL, Lindroth RL. 2004. Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Oecologia 139: 55-65.
57. Paakkonen E, Holopainen T. 1995. Influence of nitrogen supply on the response of clones of birch (Betula pendula Roth) to ozone. New Phytologist 129: 595-603.
58. 2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist 157: 175-198.
59. 2 in the perennial grass Bromus erectus. Global Change Biology 13: 1028-1139.
60. Thomas BR, MacDonald SE, Dancik BP. 1997. Variance components, heritabilities, and gain estimates for growth chamber and field performance of Populus tremuloides: growth parameters. Silvae Genetica 46: 317-326.
61. Tuskan GA, DiFazio SP, Teichmann T. 2003. Poplar genomics is getting popular: the impact of the poplar genome project on tree research. Plant Biology 5: 1-3.
62. Uddling J, Teclaw RM, Kubiske ME, Pregitzer K, Ellsworth DS. 2008. Sap flux in pure aspen and mixed aspen-birch forests exposed to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiology 28: 1231-1243.
63. 2 concentration. Tree Physiology 20: 1019-1028.
64. 3 annuals? Oecologia 123: 330-341.
65. Whitfield C, Davidson AW, Ashenden TW. 1997. Artificial selection and heritability of ozone resistance in two populations of Plantago major. New Phytologist 137: 645-655.
66. Whitham TG, DiFazio SP, Schwitzer JA, Shuster SM, Allan GJ, Bailey JK, Woolbright SA. 2008. Extending genomics to natural communities and ecosystems. Science 320: 492-495.
67. 2. Global Change Biology 10: 1389-1401.
68. Wyckoff PH, Clark JS. 2002. The relationship between growth and mortality for seven co-occurring tree species in the southern Appalachian mountains. Journal of Ecology 90: 604-615.
69. 2: selection for improved productivity in the 21st century. Functional Plant Biology 27: 979-984.